Specialists’ Dual Practice within Public Hospital Setting : Evidence from Malaysia
In line with the commitment of the Malaysian government and Ministry of Health to prevent the brain drain of specialists from public hospitals, they have been permitted to perform dual practice within the public hospital setting (DPH) since 2007. DPH allowed them to hold jobs in both public and priv...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI
2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/41040/1/Specialists%E2%80%99%20Dual.pdf http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/41040/ https://www.mdpi.com/journal/healthcare https://doi.org/10.3390/ healthcare10102097 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | In line with the commitment of the Malaysian government and Ministry of Health to prevent the brain drain of specialists from public hospitals, they have been permitted to perform dual practice within the public hospital setting (DPH) since 2007. DPH allowed them to hold jobs in both public and private practices within the same public hospitals that they are affiliated to, permitting these specialists to treat public and private patients. Nevertheless, the information regarding DPH in Southeast Asia region is still limited. This narrative review provides insight into the implementation of DPH in Malaysia. It highlights that DPH has been well-governed and regulated by the MOH
while serving as a means to retain specialists in the public healthcare system by providing them with
opportunities to obtain additional income. Such a policy has also reduced the financial burden of the
government in subsidizing healthcare. However, as in other countries with similar policies, multiple
challenges have arisen from the implementation of DPH in Malaysia despite its positive achievements
and potentials. This paper concludes that proactive governance, monitoring, and regulation are key
to ensure the success of DPH |
|---|