Psychometric Properties of Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ) for Weight-Related Difficulties Questionnaire among University Students

This study evaluates the 22-item of Acceptance and Action on Weight-Related Difficulties Questionnaire-Revised 18 (AAQW-R18), which assesses weight-related psychological flexibility in university students. A total of 120 university students from the Faculty of Sports Science and Recreation, UiTM,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Patricia Pawa, Pitil, Siti Raudzah, Ghazali
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universal Publishers 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/35485/1/V13N2-14.pdf
http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/35485/
http://www.gbmrjournal.com/vol13no2.htm
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.unimas.ir.35485
record_format eprints
spelling my.unimas.ir.354852021-06-14T03:54:54Z http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/35485/ Psychometric Properties of Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ) for Weight-Related Difficulties Questionnaire among University Students Patricia Pawa, Pitil Siti Raudzah, Ghazali H Social Sciences (General) HQ The family. Marriage. Woman RA Public aspects of medicine RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine This study evaluates the 22-item of Acceptance and Action on Weight-Related Difficulties Questionnaire-Revised 18 (AAQW-R18), which assesses weight-related psychological flexibility in university students. A total of 120 university students from the Faculty of Sports Science and Recreation, UiTM, aged 18 – 24 years old with a mean BMI= 22.71 ± 4.44 kg/m2 (range 15.72 – 46.7kg/m2 ) participated in this study. Participants were 65% male and 35% female. The corrected item-total correlation found that four items (items 1, 7, 14 and 18) had to be omitted due to low and negative correlations. High internal consistency was found in full length and the new AAQW (AAQW-R18). The new AAQW showed with a good convergent validity property. A two-week test-retest reliability was excellent. Age, gender and BMI categories were similar in AAQW score distributions. The AAQW-R18 demonstrates a greater criterion-related and convergent validity, confirming the validity and reliability of this instrument to measure psychological flexibility assessment among university students. It is concluded that the AAQW-R18 can be used for measuring weight-related psychological flexibility among our population. Universal Publishers 2021 Article PeerReviewed text en http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/35485/1/V13N2-14.pdf Patricia Pawa, Pitil and Siti Raudzah, Ghazali (2021) Psychometric Properties of Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ) for Weight-Related Difficulties Questionnaire among University Students. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal, 13 (2). pp. 168-176. ISSN 1947-5667 http://www.gbmrjournal.com/vol13no2.htm
institution Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
building Centre for Academic Information Services (CAIS)
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
content_source UNIMAS Institutional Repository
url_provider http://ir.unimas.my/
language English
topic H Social Sciences (General)
HQ The family. Marriage. Woman
RA Public aspects of medicine
RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine
spellingShingle H Social Sciences (General)
HQ The family. Marriage. Woman
RA Public aspects of medicine
RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine
Patricia Pawa, Pitil
Siti Raudzah, Ghazali
Psychometric Properties of Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ) for Weight-Related Difficulties Questionnaire among University Students
description This study evaluates the 22-item of Acceptance and Action on Weight-Related Difficulties Questionnaire-Revised 18 (AAQW-R18), which assesses weight-related psychological flexibility in university students. A total of 120 university students from the Faculty of Sports Science and Recreation, UiTM, aged 18 – 24 years old with a mean BMI= 22.71 ± 4.44 kg/m2 (range 15.72 – 46.7kg/m2 ) participated in this study. Participants were 65% male and 35% female. The corrected item-total correlation found that four items (items 1, 7, 14 and 18) had to be omitted due to low and negative correlations. High internal consistency was found in full length and the new AAQW (AAQW-R18). The new AAQW showed with a good convergent validity property. A two-week test-retest reliability was excellent. Age, gender and BMI categories were similar in AAQW score distributions. The AAQW-R18 demonstrates a greater criterion-related and convergent validity, confirming the validity and reliability of this instrument to measure psychological flexibility assessment among university students. It is concluded that the AAQW-R18 can be used for measuring weight-related psychological flexibility among our population.
format Article
author Patricia Pawa, Pitil
Siti Raudzah, Ghazali
author_facet Patricia Pawa, Pitil
Siti Raudzah, Ghazali
author_sort Patricia Pawa, Pitil
title Psychometric Properties of Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ) for Weight-Related Difficulties Questionnaire among University Students
title_short Psychometric Properties of Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ) for Weight-Related Difficulties Questionnaire among University Students
title_full Psychometric Properties of Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ) for Weight-Related Difficulties Questionnaire among University Students
title_fullStr Psychometric Properties of Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ) for Weight-Related Difficulties Questionnaire among University Students
title_full_unstemmed Psychometric Properties of Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ) for Weight-Related Difficulties Questionnaire among University Students
title_sort psychometric properties of acceptance and action questionnaire (aaq) for weight-related difficulties questionnaire among university students
publisher Universal Publishers
publishDate 2021
url http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/35485/1/V13N2-14.pdf
http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/35485/
http://www.gbmrjournal.com/vol13no2.htm
_version_ 1703964089562169344
score 13.160551