Thirty-Day Clinical Outcome of Primary Percutaneous Intervention Versus Fibrinolysis Followed by Coronary Angiography in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Background: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)is the preferred reperfusion strategy in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, timely PCI cannot be offered to many patients. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the 30-day clinical outc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Oon, Y.Y., Yakub, N, Ramli, S.A.S, Koh, K.T., Ho, K.H., Shu, F., Tan, C.T., Voon, C.Y., Khiew, N.Z., Said, A., Mohd Amin, N.H., Cham, Y.L.
Format: E-Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/19190/1/Outcome%20of%20Primary%20Percutaneous%20Intervention.pdf
http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/19190/
https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-cardiology
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.09.096
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.unimas.ir.19190
record_format eprints
spelling my.unimas.ir.191902018-01-04T05:09:42Z http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/19190/ Thirty-Day Clinical Outcome of Primary Percutaneous Intervention Versus Fibrinolysis Followed by Coronary Angiography in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Oon, Y.Y. Yakub, N Ramli, S.A.S Koh, K.T. Ho, K.H. Shu, F. Tan, C.T. Voon, C.Y. Khiew, N.Z. Said, A. Mohd Amin, N.H. Cham, Y.L. R Medicine (General) Background: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)is the preferred reperfusion strategy in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, timely PCI cannot be offered to many patients. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the 30-day clinical outcome of primary PCI strategy and fibrinolysis followed by coronary angiography strategy in STEMI patients. Methods: This was a prospective, observational, single center study. All patients admitted for STEMI from 1 January 2016 to 30 November 2016 were screened for the study. Patients were divided into 2 reperfusion strategies: primary PCI or fibrinolysis followed by coronary angiography. Primary outcome was composite of all-cause mortality at 30 days. Results: A total of 178 patients were identified: 33 (18.5%) underwent primary PCI and 145 (81.5%) underwent fibrinolysis first. The median door-to-balloon time in the primary PCI group was 161.0 minutes (IQR 84.5). The median time from fibrinolysis-to-arrival at catheterization lab was 1738 minutes (IQR 901). The median total ischaemic time was 369 min (IQR 524) and 210 (IQR 247) for the primary PCI and fibrinolysis first group respectively (p=0.002). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for 30-day all-cause mortality was 24.2% vs 9.7% respectively in primary PCI and fibrinolysis group p=0.018). Multivariate Linear Regression showed that Killip Class and LVEF were independent predictors of 30-day all-cause mortality. Reperfusion strategy was not associated with 30-day all-cause mortality (p=0.216). Conclusions: The clinical outcome of primary PCI strategy in STEMI is not better than fibrinolysis followed by coronary angiography strategy when timely PCI cannot be performed. Elsevier 2017-12-15 E-Article NonPeerReviewed text en http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/19190/1/Outcome%20of%20Primary%20Percutaneous%20Intervention.pdf Oon, Y.Y. and Yakub, N and Ramli, S.A.S and Koh, K.T. and Ho, K.H. and Shu, F. and Tan, C.T. and Voon, C.Y. and Khiew, N.Z. and Said, A. and Mohd Amin, N.H. and Cham, Y.L. (2017) Thirty-Day Clinical Outcome of Primary Percutaneous Intervention Versus Fibrinolysis Followed by Coronary Angiography in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. International Journal of Cardiology, 249 (S). S25-S26. ISSN 0167-5273 https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-cardiology https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.09.096
institution Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
building Centre for Academic Information Services (CAIS)
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
content_source UNIMAS Institutional Repository
url_provider http://ir.unimas.my/
language English
topic R Medicine (General)
spellingShingle R Medicine (General)
Oon, Y.Y.
Yakub, N
Ramli, S.A.S
Koh, K.T.
Ho, K.H.
Shu, F.
Tan, C.T.
Voon, C.Y.
Khiew, N.Z.
Said, A.
Mohd Amin, N.H.
Cham, Y.L.
Thirty-Day Clinical Outcome of Primary Percutaneous Intervention Versus Fibrinolysis Followed by Coronary Angiography in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
description Background: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)is the preferred reperfusion strategy in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, timely PCI cannot be offered to many patients. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the 30-day clinical outcome of primary PCI strategy and fibrinolysis followed by coronary angiography strategy in STEMI patients. Methods: This was a prospective, observational, single center study. All patients admitted for STEMI from 1 January 2016 to 30 November 2016 were screened for the study. Patients were divided into 2 reperfusion strategies: primary PCI or fibrinolysis followed by coronary angiography. Primary outcome was composite of all-cause mortality at 30 days. Results: A total of 178 patients were identified: 33 (18.5%) underwent primary PCI and 145 (81.5%) underwent fibrinolysis first. The median door-to-balloon time in the primary PCI group was 161.0 minutes (IQR 84.5). The median time from fibrinolysis-to-arrival at catheterization lab was 1738 minutes (IQR 901). The median total ischaemic time was 369 min (IQR 524) and 210 (IQR 247) for the primary PCI and fibrinolysis first group respectively (p=0.002). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for 30-day all-cause mortality was 24.2% vs 9.7% respectively in primary PCI and fibrinolysis group p=0.018). Multivariate Linear Regression showed that Killip Class and LVEF were independent predictors of 30-day all-cause mortality. Reperfusion strategy was not associated with 30-day all-cause mortality (p=0.216). Conclusions: The clinical outcome of primary PCI strategy in STEMI is not better than fibrinolysis followed by coronary angiography strategy when timely PCI cannot be performed.
format E-Article
author Oon, Y.Y.
Yakub, N
Ramli, S.A.S
Koh, K.T.
Ho, K.H.
Shu, F.
Tan, C.T.
Voon, C.Y.
Khiew, N.Z.
Said, A.
Mohd Amin, N.H.
Cham, Y.L.
author_facet Oon, Y.Y.
Yakub, N
Ramli, S.A.S
Koh, K.T.
Ho, K.H.
Shu, F.
Tan, C.T.
Voon, C.Y.
Khiew, N.Z.
Said, A.
Mohd Amin, N.H.
Cham, Y.L.
author_sort Oon, Y.Y.
title Thirty-Day Clinical Outcome of Primary Percutaneous Intervention Versus Fibrinolysis Followed by Coronary Angiography in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
title_short Thirty-Day Clinical Outcome of Primary Percutaneous Intervention Versus Fibrinolysis Followed by Coronary Angiography in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
title_full Thirty-Day Clinical Outcome of Primary Percutaneous Intervention Versus Fibrinolysis Followed by Coronary Angiography in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
title_fullStr Thirty-Day Clinical Outcome of Primary Percutaneous Intervention Versus Fibrinolysis Followed by Coronary Angiography in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
title_full_unstemmed Thirty-Day Clinical Outcome of Primary Percutaneous Intervention Versus Fibrinolysis Followed by Coronary Angiography in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
title_sort thirty-day clinical outcome of primary percutaneous intervention versus fibrinolysis followed by coronary angiography in st-segment elevation myocardial infarction
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2017
url http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/19190/1/Outcome%20of%20Primary%20Percutaneous%20Intervention.pdf
http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/19190/
https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-cardiology
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.09.096
_version_ 1644513006772551680
score 13.154949