Debating education for nation building in Malaysia: National school persistence or vernacular school resistance?
School and education system may be a critical and strategic platform for nation-building. At the same time, the politicization of the education system as well as the interdependent nature of schools and external forces may contribute to the destabilization of the role of school in nation building....
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
GEOGRAFIA OnlineTM
2015
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/17742/1/Debating%20education%20for%20nation%20building%20in%20Malaysia%20%28abstract%29.pdf http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/17742/ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305496336 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | School and education system may be a critical and strategic platform for nation-building. At the same time, the
politicization of the education system as well as the interdependent nature of schools and external forces may
contribute to the destabilization of the role of school in nation building. In Malaysia, the issue of mono-lingualism
as a medium of instruction in schools has been a contested one with efforts of accommodating bilingualism and
multilingualism continue to be attempted with no solutions in sight. The persistence of vernacular schools has
generated both intense debates and resistance. This article examines the reasons for the resistance to, and
persistence of vernacular schools. The data were drawn from three main sources, namely interviews with heads
and/or representatives of 12 schools (mostly national schools and Chinese schools) from four states namely
Selangor, Kelantan, Sarawak and Sabah as part of a wider project on social cohesion study as well as newspapers
and web sources. The resistance to vernacular schools was premised on the affirmation that national schools rest on
the idea of inculcating and sustaining national identity as well as facilitating cross-cultural experience and
communication while eliminating the more segregating and divisive forces in vernacular schools. By contrast, the
persistence of vernacular schools pertains to the idea of sustaining minority cultural identity, countering the lack of
national schools’ sense of accommodation and questionable quality of education, and refuting the perception of
vernacular schools as structural cause of disunity. Besides these negotiation difficulties of cultural identities in the
school system, wider power politics and market politics interplay in influencing the resistance and persistence of
vernacular schools. |
|---|