Recovery of glucose from residual starch of sago hampas for bioethanol production

Lower concentration of glucose was often obtained from enzymatic hydrolysis process of agricultural residue due to complexity of the biomass structure and properties. High substrate load feed into the hydrolysis system might solve this problem but has several other drawbacks such as low rate of reac...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dayang Salwani, Awg-Adeni, K. B., Bujang, M. A., Hassan, S., Abd-Aziz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/16366/1/Recovery.pdf
http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/16366/
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2013/935852/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.unimas.ir.16366
record_format eprints
spelling my.unimas.ir.163662022-01-25T01:23:54Z http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/16366/ Recovery of glucose from residual starch of sago hampas for bioethanol production Dayang Salwani, Awg-Adeni K. B., Bujang M. A., Hassan S., Abd-Aziz QK Botany SB Plant culture Lower concentration of glucose was often obtained from enzymatic hydrolysis process of agricultural residue due to complexity of the biomass structure and properties. High substrate load feed into the hydrolysis system might solve this problem but has several other drawbacks such as low rate of reaction. In the present study, we have attempted to enhance glucose recovery from agricultural waste, namely, "sago hampas," through three cycles of enzymatic hydrolysis process. The substrate load at 7% (w/v) was seen to be suitable for the hydrolysis process with respect to the gelatinization reaction as well as sufficient mixture of the suspension for saccharification process. However, this study was focused on hydrolyzing starch of sago hampas, and thus to enhance concentration of glucose from 7% substrate load would be impossible. Thus, an alternative method termed as cycles I, II, and III which involved reusing the hydrolysate for subsequent enzymatic hydrolysis process was introduced. Greater improvement of glucose concentration (138.45 g/L) and better conversion yield (52.72%) were achieved with the completion of three cycles of hydrolysis. In comparison, cycle I and cycle II had glucose concentration of 27.79 g/L and 73.00 g/L, respectively. The glucose obtained was subsequently tested as substrate for bioethanol production using commercial baker's yeast. The fermentation process produced 40.30 g/L of ethanol after 16 h, which was equivalent to 93.29% of theoretical yield based on total glucose existing in fermentation media Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 Article PeerReviewed text en http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/16366/1/Recovery.pdf Dayang Salwani, Awg-Adeni and K. B., Bujang and M. A., Hassan and S., Abd-Aziz (2013) Recovery of glucose from residual starch of sago hampas for bioethanol production. BioMed Research International, 2013. p. 935852. ISSN 2314-6133 https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2013/935852/ DOI: 10.1155/2013/935852
institution Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
building Centre for Academic Information Services (CAIS)
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
content_source UNIMAS Institutional Repository
url_provider http://ir.unimas.my/
language English
topic QK Botany
SB Plant culture
spellingShingle QK Botany
SB Plant culture
Dayang Salwani, Awg-Adeni
K. B., Bujang
M. A., Hassan
S., Abd-Aziz
Recovery of glucose from residual starch of sago hampas for bioethanol production
description Lower concentration of glucose was often obtained from enzymatic hydrolysis process of agricultural residue due to complexity of the biomass structure and properties. High substrate load feed into the hydrolysis system might solve this problem but has several other drawbacks such as low rate of reaction. In the present study, we have attempted to enhance glucose recovery from agricultural waste, namely, "sago hampas," through three cycles of enzymatic hydrolysis process. The substrate load at 7% (w/v) was seen to be suitable for the hydrolysis process with respect to the gelatinization reaction as well as sufficient mixture of the suspension for saccharification process. However, this study was focused on hydrolyzing starch of sago hampas, and thus to enhance concentration of glucose from 7% substrate load would be impossible. Thus, an alternative method termed as cycles I, II, and III which involved reusing the hydrolysate for subsequent enzymatic hydrolysis process was introduced. Greater improvement of glucose concentration (138.45 g/L) and better conversion yield (52.72%) were achieved with the completion of three cycles of hydrolysis. In comparison, cycle I and cycle II had glucose concentration of 27.79 g/L and 73.00 g/L, respectively. The glucose obtained was subsequently tested as substrate for bioethanol production using commercial baker's yeast. The fermentation process produced 40.30 g/L of ethanol after 16 h, which was equivalent to 93.29% of theoretical yield based on total glucose existing in fermentation media
format Article
author Dayang Salwani, Awg-Adeni
K. B., Bujang
M. A., Hassan
S., Abd-Aziz
author_facet Dayang Salwani, Awg-Adeni
K. B., Bujang
M. A., Hassan
S., Abd-Aziz
author_sort Dayang Salwani, Awg-Adeni
title Recovery of glucose from residual starch of sago hampas for bioethanol production
title_short Recovery of glucose from residual starch of sago hampas for bioethanol production
title_full Recovery of glucose from residual starch of sago hampas for bioethanol production
title_fullStr Recovery of glucose from residual starch of sago hampas for bioethanol production
title_full_unstemmed Recovery of glucose from residual starch of sago hampas for bioethanol production
title_sort recovery of glucose from residual starch of sago hampas for bioethanol production
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
publishDate 2013
url http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/16366/1/Recovery.pdf
http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/16366/
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2013/935852/
_version_ 1724078492807593984
score 13.211869