Comparative studies of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor vs sulphonylurea among Muslim Type 2 diabetes patients who fast in the month of Ramadan: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Aim To systematically review the literature to compare the use of DPP4 inhibitors vs sulphonylurea in type 2 diabetic Muslim patients who fast in Ramadan, with regards to its safety, tolerability, glycemic control, and body weight changes. Methods All English-language medical literature published fr...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | E-Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier Ltd
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/13598/7/Comparative%20studies%20of%20dipeptidyl%20peptidase%20%28abstract%29.pdf http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/13598/ https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84942044944&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&st1=Comparative+studies+of+dipeptidyl+peptidase+4+inhibitor+vs+sulphonylurea+among+Muslim+Type+2+diabetes+patients+who+fast+in+the+month+of+Ramadan%3a+A+s |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.unimas.ir.13598 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.unimas.ir.135982017-02-17T01:17:55Z http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/13598/ Comparative studies of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor vs sulphonylurea among Muslim Type 2 diabetes patients who fast in the month of Ramadan: A systematic review and meta-analysis Loh, Huai Heng Yee, Anne Loh, Huai Seng Norlela, Sukor Nor Azmi Zmi, Kamaruddin R Medicine (General) Aim To systematically review the literature to compare the use of DPP4 inhibitors vs sulphonylurea in type 2 diabetic Muslim patients who fast in Ramadan, with regards to its safety, tolerability, glycemic control, and body weight changes. Methods All English-language medical literature published from inception till October 2014 which met the inclusion criteria were reviewed and analyzed. Results A total of nine papers were included, reviewed and analyzed. The total sample size was 4276 patients. All studies used either of the two DPP4 inhibitors - Vildagliptin or Sitagliptin, vs sulphonylurea or meglitinides. Patients receiving DPP4 inhibitors were less likely to develop symptomatic hypoglycemia (risk ratio 0.46; 95% CI, 0.30-0.70), confirmed hypoglycemia (risk ratio 0.36; 95% CI, 0.21-0.64) and severe hypoglycemia (risk ratio 0.22; 95% CI, 0.10-0.53) compared with patients on sulphonylureas. There was no statistically significant difference in HbA1C changes comparing Vildagliptin and sulphonylurea. Conclusion DPP4 inhibitor is a safer alternative to sulphonylurea in Muslim patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who fast during the month of Ramadan as it is associated with lower risk of symptomatic, confirmed and severe hypoglycemia, with efficacy comparable to sulphonylurea. Elsevier Ltd 2016-06-01 E-Article PeerReviewed text en http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/13598/7/Comparative%20studies%20of%20dipeptidyl%20peptidase%20%28abstract%29.pdf Loh, Huai Heng and Yee, Anne and Loh, Huai Seng and Norlela, Sukor and Nor Azmi Zmi, Kamaruddin (2016) Comparative studies of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor vs sulphonylurea among Muslim Type 2 diabetes patients who fast in the month of Ramadan: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Primary Care Diabetes, 10 (3). pp. 210-219. ISSN 17519918 https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84942044944&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&st1=Comparative+studies+of+dipeptidyl+peptidase+4+inhibitor+vs+sulphonylurea+among+Muslim+Type+2+diabetes+patients+who+fast+in+the+month+of+Ramadan%3a+A+s DOI: 10.1016/j.pcd.2015.09.001 |
institution |
Universiti Malaysia Sarawak |
building |
Centre for Academic Information Services (CAIS) |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Malaysia Sarawak |
content_source |
UNIMAS Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://ir.unimas.my/ |
language |
English |
topic |
R Medicine (General) |
spellingShingle |
R Medicine (General) Loh, Huai Heng Yee, Anne Loh, Huai Seng Norlela, Sukor Nor Azmi Zmi, Kamaruddin Comparative studies of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor vs sulphonylurea among Muslim Type 2 diabetes patients who fast in the month of Ramadan: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
description |
Aim To systematically review the literature to compare the use of DPP4 inhibitors vs sulphonylurea in type 2 diabetic Muslim patients who fast in Ramadan, with regards to its safety, tolerability, glycemic control, and body weight changes. Methods All English-language medical literature published from inception till October 2014 which met the inclusion criteria were reviewed and analyzed. Results A total of nine papers were included, reviewed and analyzed. The total sample size was 4276 patients. All studies used either of the two DPP4 inhibitors - Vildagliptin or Sitagliptin, vs sulphonylurea or meglitinides. Patients receiving DPP4 inhibitors were less likely to develop symptomatic hypoglycemia (risk ratio 0.46; 95% CI, 0.30-0.70), confirmed hypoglycemia (risk ratio 0.36; 95% CI, 0.21-0.64) and severe hypoglycemia (risk ratio 0.22; 95% CI, 0.10-0.53) compared with patients on sulphonylureas. There was no statistically significant difference in HbA1C changes comparing Vildagliptin and sulphonylurea. Conclusion DPP4 inhibitor is a safer alternative to sulphonylurea in Muslim patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who fast during the month of Ramadan as it is associated with lower risk of symptomatic, confirmed and severe hypoglycemia, with efficacy comparable to sulphonylurea. |
format |
E-Article |
author |
Loh, Huai Heng Yee, Anne Loh, Huai Seng Norlela, Sukor Nor Azmi Zmi, Kamaruddin |
author_facet |
Loh, Huai Heng Yee, Anne Loh, Huai Seng Norlela, Sukor Nor Azmi Zmi, Kamaruddin |
author_sort |
Loh, Huai Heng |
title |
Comparative studies of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor vs sulphonylurea among Muslim Type 2 diabetes patients who fast in the month of Ramadan: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short |
Comparative studies of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor vs sulphonylurea among Muslim Type 2 diabetes patients who fast in the month of Ramadan: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full |
Comparative studies of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor vs sulphonylurea among Muslim Type 2 diabetes patients who fast in the month of Ramadan: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
Comparative studies of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor vs sulphonylurea among Muslim Type 2 diabetes patients who fast in the month of Ramadan: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative studies of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor vs sulphonylurea among Muslim Type 2 diabetes patients who fast in the month of Ramadan: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort |
comparative studies of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor vs sulphonylurea among muslim type 2 diabetes patients who fast in the month of ramadan: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
publisher |
Elsevier Ltd |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/13598/7/Comparative%20studies%20of%20dipeptidyl%20peptidase%20%28abstract%29.pdf http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/13598/ https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84942044944&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&st1=Comparative+studies+of+dipeptidyl+peptidase+4+inhibitor+vs+sulphonylurea+among+Muslim+Type+2+diabetes+patients+who+fast+in+the+month+of+Ramadan%3a+A+s |
_version_ |
1644511693721567232 |
score |
13.160551 |