Teaching workload in 21st century higher education learning setting

A standard equation on teaching workload calculation in the previous academic setting only includes the contact hours with students through lecture, tutorial, laboratory and in-person consultation (i.e. one-to-one final year project consultation). This paper discusses teaching workload factors accor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hamimah, Ujir, Shanti Faridah, Salleh, Ade Syaheda Wani, Marzuki, Hashimatul Fatma, Hashim, Aidil Azli, Alias
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science. C5 Plumbon, Banguntapan, Yogyakarta, 55198, Indonesia 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/46369/1/EJ1246415.pdf
http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/46369/
https://ijere.iaescore.com/index.php/IJERE/article/view/20419
http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i1.20419
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.unimas.ir-46369
record_format eprints
spelling my.unimas.ir-463692024-10-18T00:24:17Z http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/46369/ Teaching workload in 21st century higher education learning setting Hamimah, Ujir Shanti Faridah, Salleh Ade Syaheda Wani, Marzuki Hashimatul Fatma, Hashim Aidil Azli, Alias L Education (General) A standard equation on teaching workload calculation in the previous academic setting only includes the contact hours with students through lecture, tutorial, laboratory and in-person consultation (i.e. one-to-one final year project consultation). This paper discusses teaching workload factors according to the current higher-education setting. Devising a teaching workload equation that includes all teaching and learning strategies in the 21st century higher education learning setting is needed. This is indeed a challenging task for the academic administrators to scrutinize every single parameter that accounted for teaching and learning. In this work, we have discussed the parameters which are significant in teaching workload calculation. For instance, the conventional in-person contact with the students, type of delivery, type of assessment, the preparation of materials for flipped classroom as well as MOOC, to name a few. Teaching workload also affects quality teaching and from the academic perception, the higher workload means lower-quality teaching. Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science. C5 Plumbon, Banguntapan, Yogyakarta, 55198, Indonesia 2020-03 Article PeerReviewed text en http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/46369/1/EJ1246415.pdf Hamimah, Ujir and Shanti Faridah, Salleh and Ade Syaheda Wani, Marzuki and Hashimatul Fatma, Hashim and Aidil Azli, Alias (2020) Teaching workload in 21st century higher education learning setting. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9 (1). pp. 221-227. ISSN 2252-8822 https://ijere.iaescore.com/index.php/IJERE/article/view/20419 http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i1.20419
institution Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
building Centre for Academic Information Services (CAIS)
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
content_source UNIMAS Institutional Repository
url_provider http://ir.unimas.my/
language English
topic L Education (General)
spellingShingle L Education (General)
Hamimah, Ujir
Shanti Faridah, Salleh
Ade Syaheda Wani, Marzuki
Hashimatul Fatma, Hashim
Aidil Azli, Alias
Teaching workload in 21st century higher education learning setting
description A standard equation on teaching workload calculation in the previous academic setting only includes the contact hours with students through lecture, tutorial, laboratory and in-person consultation (i.e. one-to-one final year project consultation). This paper discusses teaching workload factors according to the current higher-education setting. Devising a teaching workload equation that includes all teaching and learning strategies in the 21st century higher education learning setting is needed. This is indeed a challenging task for the academic administrators to scrutinize every single parameter that accounted for teaching and learning. In this work, we have discussed the parameters which are significant in teaching workload calculation. For instance, the conventional in-person contact with the students, type of delivery, type of assessment, the preparation of materials for flipped classroom as well as MOOC, to name a few. Teaching workload also affects quality teaching and from the academic perception, the higher workload means lower-quality teaching.
format Article
author Hamimah, Ujir
Shanti Faridah, Salleh
Ade Syaheda Wani, Marzuki
Hashimatul Fatma, Hashim
Aidil Azli, Alias
author_facet Hamimah, Ujir
Shanti Faridah, Salleh
Ade Syaheda Wani, Marzuki
Hashimatul Fatma, Hashim
Aidil Azli, Alias
author_sort Hamimah, Ujir
title Teaching workload in 21st century higher education learning setting
title_short Teaching workload in 21st century higher education learning setting
title_full Teaching workload in 21st century higher education learning setting
title_fullStr Teaching workload in 21st century higher education learning setting
title_full_unstemmed Teaching workload in 21st century higher education learning setting
title_sort teaching workload in 21st century higher education learning setting
publisher Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science. C5 Plumbon, Banguntapan, Yogyakarta, 55198, Indonesia
publishDate 2020
url http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/46369/1/EJ1246415.pdf
http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/46369/
https://ijere.iaescore.com/index.php/IJERE/article/view/20419
http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i1.20419
_version_ 1814942160775020544
score 13.214268