Cover Image

Comparison of Two Recurve Archery Techniques: A preliminary study

Link to publisher's homepage at http://www.mohejournal.com/index.php/mohe

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lau, Jiun Sien, Rosniwati, Ghafar, Mohd Asri, Ariffin, Mardhiah, Mohamed, Mohd Hafezi, Mat Zain
Other Authors: rosnikk@usm.my
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Kementerian Pendidikan Tinggi (KPT), Malaysia 2018
Subjects:
Recurve Archery
Motion Analysis
Method > Archery
Shooting Performances
Online Access:http://dspace.unimap.edu.my:80/xmlui/handle/123456789/52113
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.unimap-52113
record_format dspace
spelling my.unimap-521132018-03-10T07:04:13Z Comparison of Two Recurve Archery Techniques: A preliminary study Lau, Jiun Sien Rosniwati, Ghafar Mohd Asri, Ariffin Mardhiah, Mohamed Mohd Hafezi, Mat Zain rosnikk@usm.my Recurve Archery Motion Analysis Method -- Archery Shooting Performances Link to publisher's homepage at http://www.mohejournal.com/index.php/mohe The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of two different archery methods on their shooting performances. Similarities or differences in each method were compared in certain steps in the shooting cycle of the participants, while performances were compared using the score achieved on a target face. The participants are four male recurve archers from Kelantan who volunteered to join this study. Pre and post-test scores of the total points for 36 arrows shot at 10 meters and 30 meters were collected. A 3D motion analysis (Qualysis AB, Sweden) system was used to record the method of the archers for stance, posture, and shoulder alignment phase. After a familiarisation period with the body markers and testing environment, the participants were asked to shoot 36 arrows with their personal method at a distance of 10 meters and 30 meters. Then, the participants were taught the new method known as Biomechanically Efficient Shooting Technique (BEST) method. One week was given for the participants to practice and familiarize with the new method. The scores were collected again at 10 meters and 30 meters with the BEST method. The methods of recurve archery were further broken down to 10 steps for analysis. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to detect the differences between their own method and the BEST method based on the 3D motion analysis data. Most of the participants showed significant changes in the shooting steps, 8 steps out of 10 steps showed significant differences based on p value. This showed that the BEST method is different from the participants’ method. The changes used in the method showed the improvement in the shooting performance. Most of the participants showed improvement in the score for 10 meters and 30 meters as well as the distance of the arrow away from the centre based on the p value. Thus, from the result it can be concluded that the BEST method is able to improve the participants’ performances. 2018-03-10T07:04:13Z 2018-03-10T07:04:13Z 2017 Article Movement, Health & Exercise (MoHE), vol.6(2), 2017, pages 97-119 2231-9409 (Print) 2289-9510 (Online) http://dspace.unimap.edu.my:80/xmlui/handle/123456789/52113 en Kementerian Pendidikan Tinggi (KPT), Malaysia
institution Universiti Malaysia Perlis
building UniMAP Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Perlis
content_source UniMAP Library Digital Repository
url_provider http://dspace.unimap.edu.my/
language English
topic Recurve Archery
Motion Analysis
Method -- Archery
Shooting Performances
spellingShingle Recurve Archery
Motion Analysis
Method -- Archery
Shooting Performances
Lau, Jiun Sien
Rosniwati, Ghafar
Mohd Asri, Ariffin
Mardhiah, Mohamed
Mohd Hafezi, Mat Zain
Comparison of Two Recurve Archery Techniques: A preliminary study
description Link to publisher's homepage at http://www.mohejournal.com/index.php/mohe
author2 rosnikk@usm.my
author_facet rosnikk@usm.my
Lau, Jiun Sien
Rosniwati, Ghafar
Mohd Asri, Ariffin
Mardhiah, Mohamed
Mohd Hafezi, Mat Zain
format Article
author Lau, Jiun Sien
Rosniwati, Ghafar
Mohd Asri, Ariffin
Mardhiah, Mohamed
Mohd Hafezi, Mat Zain
author_sort Lau, Jiun Sien
title Comparison of Two Recurve Archery Techniques: A preliminary study
title_short Comparison of Two Recurve Archery Techniques: A preliminary study
title_full Comparison of Two Recurve Archery Techniques: A preliminary study
title_fullStr Comparison of Two Recurve Archery Techniques: A preliminary study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Two Recurve Archery Techniques: A preliminary study
title_sort comparison of two recurve archery techniques: a preliminary study
publisher Kementerian Pendidikan Tinggi (KPT), Malaysia
publishDate 2018
url http://dspace.unimap.edu.my:80/xmlui/handle/123456789/52113
_version_ 1643803460661936128
score 13.214268

Similar Items