Cover Image

A Comparative Study on Reasoning Strategies in L1 and L2 Critical Reading-Thinking Tests

Full text also available at : http://idosi.org/wasj/wasj21%28SLTL%292013.htm (Open access Journal)

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Afiza Mohamad Ali
Format:
Published: IDOSI Publication 2014
Subjects:
Reading comprehension
Critical thinking
English as second language
Think aloud method
Reasoning strategies
Critical reading test
Online Access:http://idosi.org/wasj/wasj21%28SLTL%292013.htm
http://localhost/xmlui/handle/123456789/7218
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.unikl.ir-7218
record_format eprints
spelling my.unikl.ir-72182014-07-16T04:25:05Z A Comparative Study on Reasoning Strategies in L1 and L2 Critical Reading-Thinking Tests Afiza Mohamad Ali Reading comprehension Critical thinking English as second language Think aloud method Reasoning strategies Critical reading test Full text also available at : http://idosi.org/wasj/wasj21%28SLTL%292013.htm (Open access Journal) The need to investigate test-takers’ reading comprehension processes has been emphasized in the related literature. The present study aimed at examining English as a Second Language (L2) students’ reasoning processing strategies in taking critical reading-thinking tests in their first and second language using a think aloud approach. The study is set against a background of recent research into critical thinking and reading comprehension in a second language. Reasoning strategies were identified from the protocol analyses and these were categorized into reasoning formulation, reasoning monitoring and reasoning regulation strategies. The majority strategies indicated that inference acted as an over-arching strategy that linked to the reasoning strategies which made inferences from contextual clues, background knowledge and knowledge of formal schemata. Implications of the findings for pedagogy and future research into critical reading in a second language are considered. 2014-07-16T04:25:05Z 2014-07-16T04:25:05Z 2013-11 Ali, A. M. (2013). A Comparative Study on Reasoning Strategies in L1 and L2 Critical Reading-Thinking Tests. World Applied Sciences Journal, 13(21). DOI: 10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.21.sltl.2131 1818-4952 http://idosi.org/wasj/wasj21%28SLTL%292013.htm http://localhost/xmlui/handle/123456789/7218 World Applied Sciences Journal; IDOSI Publication
institution Universiti Kuala Lumpur
building UniKL Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Kuala Lumpur
content_source UniKL Institutional Repository
url_provider http://ir.unikl.edu.my/
topic Reading comprehension
Critical thinking
English as second language
Think aloud method
Reasoning strategies
Critical reading test
spellingShingle Reading comprehension
Critical thinking
English as second language
Think aloud method
Reasoning strategies
Critical reading test
Afiza Mohamad Ali
A Comparative Study on Reasoning Strategies in L1 and L2 Critical Reading-Thinking Tests
description Full text also available at : http://idosi.org/wasj/wasj21%28SLTL%292013.htm (Open access Journal)
format
author Afiza Mohamad Ali
author_facet Afiza Mohamad Ali
author_sort Afiza Mohamad Ali
title A Comparative Study on Reasoning Strategies in L1 and L2 Critical Reading-Thinking Tests
title_short A Comparative Study on Reasoning Strategies in L1 and L2 Critical Reading-Thinking Tests
title_full A Comparative Study on Reasoning Strategies in L1 and L2 Critical Reading-Thinking Tests
title_fullStr A Comparative Study on Reasoning Strategies in L1 and L2 Critical Reading-Thinking Tests
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study on Reasoning Strategies in L1 and L2 Critical Reading-Thinking Tests
title_sort comparative study on reasoning strategies in l1 and l2 critical reading-thinking tests
publisher IDOSI Publication
publishDate 2014
url http://idosi.org/wasj/wasj21%28SLTL%292013.htm
http://localhost/xmlui/handle/123456789/7218
_version_ 1644484884370030592
score 13.222552

Similar Items