Oil extraction from rice bran using conventional and bio-based solvents

Rice bran is the outer layer of the rice grain, rich in essential nutrients and bioactive compounds. It is a valuable by-product used for various purposes, including the extraction of rice bran oil (RBO) known for its health benefits. This study focused on extracting oil from the nutritious rice bra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S M Anisuzzaman, Vivian Michelle Yih
Format: Article
Language:English
English
Published: Penerbit UMS 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/41854/1/ABSTRACT.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/41854/2/FULL%20TEXT.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/41854/
https://doi.org/10.51200/susten.v1i1.5144
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.ums.eprints.41854
record_format eprints
spelling my.ums.eprints.418542024-11-12T03:13:35Z https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/41854/ Oil extraction from rice bran using conventional and bio-based solvents S M Anisuzzaman Vivian Michelle Yih T1-995 Technology (General) TS2120-2159 Cereals and grain. Milling industry Rice bran is the outer layer of the rice grain, rich in essential nutrients and bioactive compounds. It is a valuable by-product used for various purposes, including the extraction of rice bran oil (RBO) known for its health benefits. This study focused on extracting oil from the nutritious rice bran using both conventional solvent (n-hexane) and bio-based solvent (isopropanol) for comparison under diverse conditions. The RBO yields were analysed at different temperatures of 40oC, 50oC, and 60oC, with bran-to-solvent ratios of 1:3, 1:5, and 1:7, and extraction times of 2, 4, and 6 hours. The highest yields achieved were 12.4% for n-hexane at 60oC, 1:7 ratio, and 6 hours, and 9.76% for isopropanol at 60oC, 1:7 ratio, and 4 hours. The extracted oil underwent comprehensive physical analysis, including density, acid value, free fatty acid, and iodine value test. The physical analysis revealed density values of 0.867 g/mL for n-hexane and 0.866 g/mL for isopropanol. Acid values were 21.48 mg KOH/g (n-hexane) and 26.90 mg KOH/g (isopropanol). Free fatty acid percentages were 10.74% (n-hexane) and 13.45% (isopropanol). Iodine values were 65.48 mg (n-hexane) and 60.40 mg (isopropanol). The collected data were analysed using response surface methodology (RSM) to optimize the extraction condition, predicting the highest yield at 60oC, with a bran-to-oil ratio of 1:5 parts solvent, and an extraction time of 6 hours. Statistical analysis confirmed the significance of the optimization model (p < 0.05). Overall, this study provided valuable insights, advancing more efficient and effective RBO production methods. Penerbit UMS 2024 Article NonPeerReviewed text en https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/41854/1/ABSTRACT.pdf text en https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/41854/2/FULL%20TEXT.pdf S M Anisuzzaman and Vivian Michelle Yih (2024) Oil extraction from rice bran using conventional and bio-based solvents. Sustainable Engineering, 1. pp. 1-15. https://doi.org/10.51200/susten.v1i1.5144
institution Universiti Malaysia Sabah
building UMS Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Sabah
content_source UMS Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.ums.edu.my/
language English
English
topic T1-995 Technology (General)
TS2120-2159 Cereals and grain. Milling industry
spellingShingle T1-995 Technology (General)
TS2120-2159 Cereals and grain. Milling industry
S M Anisuzzaman
Vivian Michelle Yih
Oil extraction from rice bran using conventional and bio-based solvents
description Rice bran is the outer layer of the rice grain, rich in essential nutrients and bioactive compounds. It is a valuable by-product used for various purposes, including the extraction of rice bran oil (RBO) known for its health benefits. This study focused on extracting oil from the nutritious rice bran using both conventional solvent (n-hexane) and bio-based solvent (isopropanol) for comparison under diverse conditions. The RBO yields were analysed at different temperatures of 40oC, 50oC, and 60oC, with bran-to-solvent ratios of 1:3, 1:5, and 1:7, and extraction times of 2, 4, and 6 hours. The highest yields achieved were 12.4% for n-hexane at 60oC, 1:7 ratio, and 6 hours, and 9.76% for isopropanol at 60oC, 1:7 ratio, and 4 hours. The extracted oil underwent comprehensive physical analysis, including density, acid value, free fatty acid, and iodine value test. The physical analysis revealed density values of 0.867 g/mL for n-hexane and 0.866 g/mL for isopropanol. Acid values were 21.48 mg KOH/g (n-hexane) and 26.90 mg KOH/g (isopropanol). Free fatty acid percentages were 10.74% (n-hexane) and 13.45% (isopropanol). Iodine values were 65.48 mg (n-hexane) and 60.40 mg (isopropanol). The collected data were analysed using response surface methodology (RSM) to optimize the extraction condition, predicting the highest yield at 60oC, with a bran-to-oil ratio of 1:5 parts solvent, and an extraction time of 6 hours. Statistical analysis confirmed the significance of the optimization model (p < 0.05). Overall, this study provided valuable insights, advancing more efficient and effective RBO production methods.
format Article
author S M Anisuzzaman
Vivian Michelle Yih
author_facet S M Anisuzzaman
Vivian Michelle Yih
author_sort S M Anisuzzaman
title Oil extraction from rice bran using conventional and bio-based solvents
title_short Oil extraction from rice bran using conventional and bio-based solvents
title_full Oil extraction from rice bran using conventional and bio-based solvents
title_fullStr Oil extraction from rice bran using conventional and bio-based solvents
title_full_unstemmed Oil extraction from rice bran using conventional and bio-based solvents
title_sort oil extraction from rice bran using conventional and bio-based solvents
publisher Penerbit UMS
publishDate 2024
url https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/41854/1/ABSTRACT.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/41854/2/FULL%20TEXT.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/41854/
https://doi.org/10.51200/susten.v1i1.5144
_version_ 1816131863122542592
score 13.214268