Comparing translation accuracy in Belt and Road Malaysia children’s literature: Malay and Chinese native speakers vs ChatGPT
The study investigates the translation processes of human and artificial intelligence translators in comparison. Human translators consist of a Chinese native speaker and belt and road translators. Different versions of artificial intelligence translators comprise ChatGPT 3.5 and ChatGPT 4.0. The re...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English English |
Published: |
Bilingual Publishing Group
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/38773/1/ABSTRACT.pdf https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/38773/2/FULL%20TEXT.pdf https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/38773/ https://doi.org/10.59400/fls.v6i1.2069 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The study investigates the translation processes of human and artificial intelligence translators in comparison. Human translators consist of a Chinese native speaker and belt and road translators. Different versions of artificial intelligence translators comprise ChatGPT 3.5 and ChatGPT 4.0. The research methodology employed is a keyword detection technique. One human translator and one translator powered by artificial intelligence achieved the highest scores in keyword detection, according to the results. Human translators continue to be indispensable in the field of translation, particularly in the translation of literary works. However, the research group is optimistic that artificial intelligence will soon be able to resolve this issue. |
---|