Curriculum for Undergraduate Medical Sciences: Traditional, Integrated or Both

The traditional curriculum for undergraduate medical students ensures disciplinebased learning. In a traditional curriculum, students get ample time to get a detailed understanding and undergraduate-level knowledge which is elaborative and sufficient for each subject. Although the students gain ampl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sadia Choudhury Shimmi, M. Tanveer Hossain Parash, Fairrul Masnah @ Kadir
Format: Article
Language:English
English
Published: UMS 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/37263/1/ABSTRACT.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/37263/2/FULL%20TEXT.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/37263/
https://doi.org/10.51200/bjms.v17i2.4367
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.ums.eprints.37263
record_format eprints
spelling my.ums.eprints.372632023-09-19T02:37:31Z https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/37263/ Curriculum for Undergraduate Medical Sciences: Traditional, Integrated or Both Sadia Choudhury Shimmi M. Tanveer Hossain Parash Fairrul Masnah @ Kadir HQ1101-2030.7 Women. Feminism QH301-705.5 Biology (General) The traditional curriculum for undergraduate medical students ensures disciplinebased learning. In a traditional curriculum, students get ample time to get a detailed understanding and undergraduate-level knowledge which is elaborative and sufficient for each subject. Although the students gain ample knowledge of the subject, they lack in correlating the gained information with other subjects. This is not the students’ fault; instead, it is due to the lack of scope of correlation in the traditional curriculum. In this curriculum, students are not taught about the applicability of the gained information. Consequently, basic science or pre-clinical subjects seem irrelevant to the students as if the clinical subjects are independent of these subjects, whereas the reality is the opposite (Watmough et al., 2009). The knowledge of the basic subjects serves as the targeted goal of clinical manoeuvre. Traditional curriculum receives criticism for demotivating students to learn basic subjects to practice as a doctor. Moreover, the traditional curriculum is a more lecture-dependent oneway teaching method devoid of a studentoriented approach (Christianson et al., 2007). There is no scope for problem-solving or critical thinking rather than pedagogical learning. Another disadvantage of the traditional curriculum is that students need to wait until clinical years to have experience with patients. Therefore, there is no opportunity for clinical skill development earlier in this curriculum (Rahman, 2022). UMS 2023 Article NonPeerReviewed text en https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/37263/1/ABSTRACT.pdf text en https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/37263/2/FULL%20TEXT.pdf Sadia Choudhury Shimmi and M. Tanveer Hossain Parash and Fairrul Masnah @ Kadir (2023) Curriculum for Undergraduate Medical Sciences: Traditional, Integrated or Both. Borneo Journal of Medical Sciences, 17 (2). pp. 1-3. ISSN 1985-1758 https://doi.org/10.51200/bjms.v17i2.4367
institution Universiti Malaysia Sabah
building UMS Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Sabah
content_source UMS Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.ums.edu.my/
language English
English
topic HQ1101-2030.7 Women. Feminism
QH301-705.5 Biology (General)
spellingShingle HQ1101-2030.7 Women. Feminism
QH301-705.5 Biology (General)
Sadia Choudhury Shimmi
M. Tanveer Hossain Parash
Fairrul Masnah @ Kadir
Curriculum for Undergraduate Medical Sciences: Traditional, Integrated or Both
description The traditional curriculum for undergraduate medical students ensures disciplinebased learning. In a traditional curriculum, students get ample time to get a detailed understanding and undergraduate-level knowledge which is elaborative and sufficient for each subject. Although the students gain ample knowledge of the subject, they lack in correlating the gained information with other subjects. This is not the students’ fault; instead, it is due to the lack of scope of correlation in the traditional curriculum. In this curriculum, students are not taught about the applicability of the gained information. Consequently, basic science or pre-clinical subjects seem irrelevant to the students as if the clinical subjects are independent of these subjects, whereas the reality is the opposite (Watmough et al., 2009). The knowledge of the basic subjects serves as the targeted goal of clinical manoeuvre. Traditional curriculum receives criticism for demotivating students to learn basic subjects to practice as a doctor. Moreover, the traditional curriculum is a more lecture-dependent oneway teaching method devoid of a studentoriented approach (Christianson et al., 2007). There is no scope for problem-solving or critical thinking rather than pedagogical learning. Another disadvantage of the traditional curriculum is that students need to wait until clinical years to have experience with patients. Therefore, there is no opportunity for clinical skill development earlier in this curriculum (Rahman, 2022).
format Article
author Sadia Choudhury Shimmi
M. Tanveer Hossain Parash
Fairrul Masnah @ Kadir
author_facet Sadia Choudhury Shimmi
M. Tanveer Hossain Parash
Fairrul Masnah @ Kadir
author_sort Sadia Choudhury Shimmi
title Curriculum for Undergraduate Medical Sciences: Traditional, Integrated or Both
title_short Curriculum for Undergraduate Medical Sciences: Traditional, Integrated or Both
title_full Curriculum for Undergraduate Medical Sciences: Traditional, Integrated or Both
title_fullStr Curriculum for Undergraduate Medical Sciences: Traditional, Integrated or Both
title_full_unstemmed Curriculum for Undergraduate Medical Sciences: Traditional, Integrated or Both
title_sort curriculum for undergraduate medical sciences: traditional, integrated or both
publisher UMS
publishDate 2023
url https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/37263/1/ABSTRACT.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/37263/2/FULL%20TEXT.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/37263/
https://doi.org/10.51200/bjms.v17i2.4367
_version_ 1778162804904165376
score 13.211869