Next generation insect taxonomic classification by comparing different deep learning algorithms

Insect taxonomy lies at the heart of many aspects of ecology, and identification tasks are challenging due to the enormous inter- and intraspecies variation of insects. Conventional methods used to study insect taxonomy are often tedious, time-consuming, labor intensive, and expensive, and recently,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Song-Quan Ong, Suhaila Ab. Hamid
Format: Article
Language:English
English
Published: Plos One 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/35440/1/ABSTRACT.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/35440/2/FULL%20TEXT.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/35440/
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0279094
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279094
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279094
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.ums.eprints.35440
record_format eprints
spelling my.ums.eprints.354402023-05-22T02:37:37Z https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/35440/ Next generation insect taxonomic classification by comparing different deep learning algorithms Song-Quan Ong Suhaila Ab. Hamid Q1-295 General QL461-599.82 Insects Insect taxonomy lies at the heart of many aspects of ecology, and identification tasks are challenging due to the enormous inter- and intraspecies variation of insects. Conventional methods used to study insect taxonomy are often tedious, time-consuming, labor intensive, and expensive, and recently, computer vision with deep learning algorithms has offered an alternative way to identify and classify insect images into their taxonomic levels. We designed the classification task according to the taxonomic ranks of insects—order, family, and genus—and compared the generalization of four state-of-the-art deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) architectures. The results show that different taxonomic ranks require different deep learning (DL) algorithms to generate high-performance models, which indicates that the design of an automated systematic classification pipeline requires the integration of different algorithms. The InceptionV3 model has advantages over other models due to its high performance in distinguishing insect order and family, which is having F1- score of 0.75 and 0.79, respectively. Referring to the performance per class, Hemiptera (order), Rhiniidae (family), and Lucilia (genus) had the lowest performance, and we discuss the possible rationale and suggest future works to improve the generalization of a DL model for taxonomic rank classification.. Plos One 2022 Article PeerReviewed text en https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/35440/1/ABSTRACT.pdf text en https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/35440/2/FULL%20TEXT.pdf Song-Quan Ong and Suhaila Ab. Hamid (2022) Next generation insect taxonomic classification by comparing different deep learning algorithms. Insect taxonomic classification by deep learning algorithms. pp. 1-11. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0279094 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279094 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279094
institution Universiti Malaysia Sabah
building UMS Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Sabah
content_source UMS Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.ums.edu.my/
language English
English
topic Q1-295 General
QL461-599.82 Insects
spellingShingle Q1-295 General
QL461-599.82 Insects
Song-Quan Ong
Suhaila Ab. Hamid
Next generation insect taxonomic classification by comparing different deep learning algorithms
description Insect taxonomy lies at the heart of many aspects of ecology, and identification tasks are challenging due to the enormous inter- and intraspecies variation of insects. Conventional methods used to study insect taxonomy are often tedious, time-consuming, labor intensive, and expensive, and recently, computer vision with deep learning algorithms has offered an alternative way to identify and classify insect images into their taxonomic levels. We designed the classification task according to the taxonomic ranks of insects—order, family, and genus—and compared the generalization of four state-of-the-art deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) architectures. The results show that different taxonomic ranks require different deep learning (DL) algorithms to generate high-performance models, which indicates that the design of an automated systematic classification pipeline requires the integration of different algorithms. The InceptionV3 model has advantages over other models due to its high performance in distinguishing insect order and family, which is having F1- score of 0.75 and 0.79, respectively. Referring to the performance per class, Hemiptera (order), Rhiniidae (family), and Lucilia (genus) had the lowest performance, and we discuss the possible rationale and suggest future works to improve the generalization of a DL model for taxonomic rank classification..
format Article
author Song-Quan Ong
Suhaila Ab. Hamid
author_facet Song-Quan Ong
Suhaila Ab. Hamid
author_sort Song-Quan Ong
title Next generation insect taxonomic classification by comparing different deep learning algorithms
title_short Next generation insect taxonomic classification by comparing different deep learning algorithms
title_full Next generation insect taxonomic classification by comparing different deep learning algorithms
title_fullStr Next generation insect taxonomic classification by comparing different deep learning algorithms
title_full_unstemmed Next generation insect taxonomic classification by comparing different deep learning algorithms
title_sort next generation insect taxonomic classification by comparing different deep learning algorithms
publisher Plos One
publishDate 2022
url https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/35440/1/ABSTRACT.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/35440/2/FULL%20TEXT.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/35440/
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0279094
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279094
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279094
_version_ 1768008564123631616
score 13.211869