Auditors are watchdogs and not bloodhounds – Duty of auditors to whistleblow revisited

Auditors like to say their role is that of a watchdog (who barks when they see something suspicious) rather than a bloodhound (who searches for something suspicious). Here, the guiding principles of the corporate law for auditors are responsibility and accountability when examining companies’ accoun...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ida Shafinaz Mohamed Kamil, Sharija Che Shaari, Junaidah Zeno
Format: Article
Language:English
English
Published: Penerbit UMS 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/32605/1/Auditors%20are%20watchdogs%20and%20not%20bloodhounds%20%E2%80%93%20Duty%20of%20auditors%20to%20whistleblow%20revisited.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/32605/3/Auditors%20are%20watchdogs%20and%20not%20bloodhounds%20%E2%80%93%20Duty%20of%20auditors%20to%20whistleblow%20revisited%20_ABSTRACT.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/32605/
https://www.ums.edu.my/fpep/ACARS_Vol_3_2021.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.ums.eprints.32605
record_format eprints
spelling my.ums.eprints.326052022-05-19T00:30:49Z https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/32605/ Auditors are watchdogs and not bloodhounds – Duty of auditors to whistleblow revisited Ida Shafinaz Mohamed Kamil Sharija Che Shaari Junaidah Zeno HF5601-5689 Accounting. Bookkeeping Auditors like to say their role is that of a watchdog (who barks when they see something suspicious) rather than a bloodhound (who searches for something suspicious). Here, the guiding principles of the corporate law for auditors are responsibility and accountability when examining companies’ accounts and submitting the auditors’ reports. There are many incidents where auditors fail to whistleblow the fraud and become part of the companies' wrongful activities, which gravely affect the interests of the shareholders and stakeholders, especially and the public, generally. Such failure to whistleblow may be due to fear for the auditor’s life or simply because the auditor is not under the impression that the duty is not mandatory. Hence, this paper aims to scrutinise the auditors’ duty to whistleblow and determine whether the auditors are effective watchdogs. Employing doctrinal legal research, this paper thoroughly analysed the extent of the auditor’s duty to whistleblow any wrongful activities by examining the relevant legal provisions under the Companies Act 2016, the Capital Markets & Services Act 2007, and the Whistleblower Protection Act 2010, as well as relevant case laws. The paper concludes that although the applicable legal framework has been put in place to empower the auditors to perform their whistleblowing duty, there is still room for improvement in the legal framework so as to allow the auditors to play their role as a watchdog effectively and that the interests of the shareholders and stakeholders are considered and protected. Penerbit UMS 2021 Article PeerReviewed text en https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/32605/1/Auditors%20are%20watchdogs%20and%20not%20bloodhounds%20%E2%80%93%20Duty%20of%20auditors%20to%20whistleblow%20revisited.pdf text en https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/32605/3/Auditors%20are%20watchdogs%20and%20not%20bloodhounds%20%E2%80%93%20Duty%20of%20auditors%20to%20whistleblow%20revisited%20_ABSTRACT.pdf Ida Shafinaz Mohamed Kamil and Sharija Che Shaari and Junaidah Zeno (2021) Auditors are watchdogs and not bloodhounds – Duty of auditors to whistleblow revisited. Accounting Centre Accounting Research Series, 3. pp. 1-11. ISSN 2682-8707 https://www.ums.edu.my/fpep/ACARS_Vol_3_2021.pdf
institution Universiti Malaysia Sabah
building UMS Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Sabah
content_source UMS Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.ums.edu.my/
language English
English
topic HF5601-5689 Accounting. Bookkeeping
spellingShingle HF5601-5689 Accounting. Bookkeeping
Ida Shafinaz Mohamed Kamil
Sharija Che Shaari
Junaidah Zeno
Auditors are watchdogs and not bloodhounds – Duty of auditors to whistleblow revisited
description Auditors like to say their role is that of a watchdog (who barks when they see something suspicious) rather than a bloodhound (who searches for something suspicious). Here, the guiding principles of the corporate law for auditors are responsibility and accountability when examining companies’ accounts and submitting the auditors’ reports. There are many incidents where auditors fail to whistleblow the fraud and become part of the companies' wrongful activities, which gravely affect the interests of the shareholders and stakeholders, especially and the public, generally. Such failure to whistleblow may be due to fear for the auditor’s life or simply because the auditor is not under the impression that the duty is not mandatory. Hence, this paper aims to scrutinise the auditors’ duty to whistleblow and determine whether the auditors are effective watchdogs. Employing doctrinal legal research, this paper thoroughly analysed the extent of the auditor’s duty to whistleblow any wrongful activities by examining the relevant legal provisions under the Companies Act 2016, the Capital Markets & Services Act 2007, and the Whistleblower Protection Act 2010, as well as relevant case laws. The paper concludes that although the applicable legal framework has been put in place to empower the auditors to perform their whistleblowing duty, there is still room for improvement in the legal framework so as to allow the auditors to play their role as a watchdog effectively and that the interests of the shareholders and stakeholders are considered and protected.
format Article
author Ida Shafinaz Mohamed Kamil
Sharija Che Shaari
Junaidah Zeno
author_facet Ida Shafinaz Mohamed Kamil
Sharija Che Shaari
Junaidah Zeno
author_sort Ida Shafinaz Mohamed Kamil
title Auditors are watchdogs and not bloodhounds – Duty of auditors to whistleblow revisited
title_short Auditors are watchdogs and not bloodhounds – Duty of auditors to whistleblow revisited
title_full Auditors are watchdogs and not bloodhounds – Duty of auditors to whistleblow revisited
title_fullStr Auditors are watchdogs and not bloodhounds – Duty of auditors to whistleblow revisited
title_full_unstemmed Auditors are watchdogs and not bloodhounds – Duty of auditors to whistleblow revisited
title_sort auditors are watchdogs and not bloodhounds – duty of auditors to whistleblow revisited
publisher Penerbit UMS
publishDate 2021
url https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/32605/1/Auditors%20are%20watchdogs%20and%20not%20bloodhounds%20%E2%80%93%20Duty%20of%20auditors%20to%20whistleblow%20revisited.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/32605/3/Auditors%20are%20watchdogs%20and%20not%20bloodhounds%20%E2%80%93%20Duty%20of%20auditors%20to%20whistleblow%20revisited%20_ABSTRACT.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/32605/
https://www.ums.edu.my/fpep/ACARS_Vol_3_2021.pdf
_version_ 1760231049135128576
score 13.18916