Employment relations in the informal sector: A need for redefinition

The International Labor Organization (ILO) in the 'Report of the Committee on Employment Relationship' states that current employment relationships are increasingly complex and there is no acceptable definition to define 'employment relationships'. Thus, this paper aims to invest...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hasbullah, N., Dzurizah Ibrahim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Conscientia Beam 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/30014/1/Employment%20relations%20in%20the%20informal%20sector.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/30014/
https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85096468707&origin=inward&txGid=78ddef4da932f16c367c136636f3ecaf
http://doi.org/10.18488/JOURNAL.73.2020.84.397.406
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.ums.eprints.30014
record_format eprints
spelling my.ums.eprints.300142021-07-22T00:40:03Z https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/30014/ Employment relations in the informal sector: A need for redefinition Hasbullah, N. Dzurizah Ibrahim H Social Sciences (General) The International Labor Organization (ILO) in the 'Report of the Committee on Employment Relationship' states that current employment relationships are increasingly complex and there is no acceptable definition to define 'employment relationships'. Thus, this paper aims to investigate whether employment relations exist in the informal sector. By using Goss’ framework, this can be understood by two related dimensions. First, the extent to which employers are dependent on his or her employees, and vice versa, and second, the extent to which employees have the capacity, individually or collectively, to challenge the power of their employer. Based on these two dimensions, four distinct categories have been identified that reveal the complexity and diversity of the nature of employment relationships in the informal sector: fraternalism, paternalism, benevolent autocracy, and passive acquiescence. In-depth interviews with four employers and four workers in the informal sector in Lawas, Malaysia were conducted. The findings indicate that the nature of employment relations in the informal sector is benevolent autocracy as employers are less dependent on their employees, resulting in limited labor capacity to challenge the employer's power. A characteristic of the informal sector (such as a family-based business and not legally registered) is the lack of protection for workers, which is the main reason for shaping employment relations in this sector. It is recommended, therefore, to have policy reforms to protect the rights of workers in the informal sector Conscientia Beam 2020 Article PeerReviewed text en https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/30014/1/Employment%20relations%20in%20the%20informal%20sector.pdf Hasbullah, N. and Dzurizah Ibrahim (2020) Employment relations in the informal sector: A need for redefinition. Humanities and Social Sciences Letters, 8. pp. 397-406. ISSN 2312-5659 https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85096468707&origin=inward&txGid=78ddef4da932f16c367c136636f3ecaf http://doi.org/10.18488/JOURNAL.73.2020.84.397.406
institution Universiti Malaysia Sabah
building UMS Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Sabah
content_source UMS Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.ums.edu.my/
language English
topic H Social Sciences (General)
spellingShingle H Social Sciences (General)
Hasbullah, N.
Dzurizah Ibrahim
Employment relations in the informal sector: A need for redefinition
description The International Labor Organization (ILO) in the 'Report of the Committee on Employment Relationship' states that current employment relationships are increasingly complex and there is no acceptable definition to define 'employment relationships'. Thus, this paper aims to investigate whether employment relations exist in the informal sector. By using Goss’ framework, this can be understood by two related dimensions. First, the extent to which employers are dependent on his or her employees, and vice versa, and second, the extent to which employees have the capacity, individually or collectively, to challenge the power of their employer. Based on these two dimensions, four distinct categories have been identified that reveal the complexity and diversity of the nature of employment relationships in the informal sector: fraternalism, paternalism, benevolent autocracy, and passive acquiescence. In-depth interviews with four employers and four workers in the informal sector in Lawas, Malaysia were conducted. The findings indicate that the nature of employment relations in the informal sector is benevolent autocracy as employers are less dependent on their employees, resulting in limited labor capacity to challenge the employer's power. A characteristic of the informal sector (such as a family-based business and not legally registered) is the lack of protection for workers, which is the main reason for shaping employment relations in this sector. It is recommended, therefore, to have policy reforms to protect the rights of workers in the informal sector
format Article
author Hasbullah, N.
Dzurizah Ibrahim
author_facet Hasbullah, N.
Dzurizah Ibrahim
author_sort Hasbullah, N.
title Employment relations in the informal sector: A need for redefinition
title_short Employment relations in the informal sector: A need for redefinition
title_full Employment relations in the informal sector: A need for redefinition
title_fullStr Employment relations in the informal sector: A need for redefinition
title_full_unstemmed Employment relations in the informal sector: A need for redefinition
title_sort employment relations in the informal sector: a need for redefinition
publisher Conscientia Beam
publishDate 2020
url https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/30014/1/Employment%20relations%20in%20the%20informal%20sector.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/30014/
https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85096468707&origin=inward&txGid=78ddef4da932f16c367c136636f3ecaf
http://doi.org/10.18488/JOURNAL.73.2020.84.397.406
_version_ 1760230708084736000
score 13.211869