Comparative assessment of gravity-fed sources (rain water, ground water and hill water) quality in terms of fecal bacteria contamination from rural community area

In most of rural areas, it is difficult to get a clean and good quality of water supply. There are no treated water supply provided and the rural people have to depend on alternative source which are from untreated water resource, such as ground water, hill water or rain water. However, the drinkabl...

وصف كامل

محفوظ في:
التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
المؤلفون الرئيسيون: Carolyn Melissa Payus, Adeline Lusat, Kui, Jun Meng, Nur Haziqah, Nurasika Basri, Norela Sulaiman
التنسيق: مقال
اللغة:English
English
منشور في: Research India Publications 2015
الموضوعات:
الوصول للمادة أونلاين:https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/27520/1/Comparative%20assessment%20of%20gravity-fed%20sources%20%28rain%20water%2C%20ground%20water%20and%20hill%20water%29%20quality%20in%20terms%20of%20fecal%20bacteria%20contamination%20from%20rural%20community%20area%20ABSTRACT.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/27520/5/Comparative%20Assessment%20of%20Gravity-Fed%20Sources%20%28Rain%20Water%2C%20Ground%20Water%20and%20Hill%20Water%29%20Quality%20In%20Terms%20of%20Fecal%20Bacteria%20Contamination%20from%20Rural%20Community%20Area%20FULL%20TEXT.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/27520/
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303522640_Comparative_Assessment_of_Gravity-Fed_Sources_Rain_Water_Ground_Water_and_Hill_Water_Quality_In_Terms_of_Fecal_Bacteria_Contamination_from_Rural_Community_Area
الوسوم: إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
id my.ums.eprints.27520
record_format eprints
spelling my.ums.eprints.275202021-09-15T07:16:35Z https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/27520/ Comparative assessment of gravity-fed sources (rain water, ground water and hill water) quality in terms of fecal bacteria contamination from rural community area Carolyn Melissa Payus Adeline Lusat Kui, Jun Meng Nur Haziqah Nurasika Basri Norela Sulaiman TD Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering In most of rural areas, it is difficult to get a clean and good quality of water supply. There are no treated water supply provided and the rural people have to depend on alternative source which are from untreated water resource, such as ground water, hill water or rain water. However, the drinkable status of these water resources is uncertain. So, in order to know whether it is safe and healthy for consumption, an assessment was conducted by analyzing the quality of the untreated drinking water on fecal bacteria. The method used to determine the concentration of total coliform and fecal coliform of the sample taken from groundwater well, hill water and rain water sources was through Membrane Filtration Method from APHA standard. The results showed that the highest concentration of total coliform in hill water was 159CFU/100mL whereas fecal coliform was 66CFU/100mL. For ground water well, the highest concentration of contamination for total coliform and fecal coliform were 205CFU/100mL and 120CFU/100mL respectively. The highest concentration for total coliform and fecal coliform in rain water obtained were 62CFU/100mL and 54 CFU/100mL respectively. All these results have exceeded the standard limits of WHO (2008), Food Acts (1983) which shown the present of bacteria coliform in the untreated drinking water. It can be concluded that the ground water has the highest bacteria coliform contamination among all three water resources, whereas rainwater was found to have the lowest and safest. Research India Publications 2015 Article PeerReviewed text en https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/27520/1/Comparative%20assessment%20of%20gravity-fed%20sources%20%28rain%20water%2C%20ground%20water%20and%20hill%20water%29%20quality%20in%20terms%20of%20fecal%20bacteria%20contamination%20from%20rural%20community%20area%20ABSTRACT.pdf text en https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/27520/5/Comparative%20Assessment%20of%20Gravity-Fed%20Sources%20%28Rain%20Water%2C%20Ground%20Water%20and%20Hill%20Water%29%20Quality%20In%20Terms%20of%20Fecal%20Bacteria%20Contamination%20from%20Rural%20Community%20Area%20FULL%20TEXT.pdf Carolyn Melissa Payus and Adeline Lusat and Kui, Jun Meng and Nur Haziqah and Nurasika Basri and Norela Sulaiman (2015) Comparative assessment of gravity-fed sources (rain water, ground water and hill water) quality in terms of fecal bacteria contamination from rural community area. International Journal of Applied Environmental Sciences, 10 (3). pp. 1037-1047. ISSN 0973-6077(P-ISSN) , 0974-0260 (E-ISSN) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303522640_Comparative_Assessment_of_Gravity-Fed_Sources_Rain_Water_Ground_Water_and_Hill_Water_Quality_In_Terms_of_Fecal_Bacteria_Contamination_from_Rural_Community_Area
institution Universiti Malaysia Sabah
building UMS Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Sabah
content_source UMS Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.ums.edu.my/
language English
English
topic TD Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
spellingShingle TD Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
Carolyn Melissa Payus
Adeline Lusat
Kui, Jun Meng
Nur Haziqah
Nurasika Basri
Norela Sulaiman
Comparative assessment of gravity-fed sources (rain water, ground water and hill water) quality in terms of fecal bacteria contamination from rural community area
description In most of rural areas, it is difficult to get a clean and good quality of water supply. There are no treated water supply provided and the rural people have to depend on alternative source which are from untreated water resource, such as ground water, hill water or rain water. However, the drinkable status of these water resources is uncertain. So, in order to know whether it is safe and healthy for consumption, an assessment was conducted by analyzing the quality of the untreated drinking water on fecal bacteria. The method used to determine the concentration of total coliform and fecal coliform of the sample taken from groundwater well, hill water and rain water sources was through Membrane Filtration Method from APHA standard. The results showed that the highest concentration of total coliform in hill water was 159CFU/100mL whereas fecal coliform was 66CFU/100mL. For ground water well, the highest concentration of contamination for total coliform and fecal coliform were 205CFU/100mL and 120CFU/100mL respectively. The highest concentration for total coliform and fecal coliform in rain water obtained were 62CFU/100mL and 54 CFU/100mL respectively. All these results have exceeded the standard limits of WHO (2008), Food Acts (1983) which shown the present of bacteria coliform in the untreated drinking water. It can be concluded that the ground water has the highest bacteria coliform contamination among all three water resources, whereas rainwater was found to have the lowest and safest.
format Article
author Carolyn Melissa Payus
Adeline Lusat
Kui, Jun Meng
Nur Haziqah
Nurasika Basri
Norela Sulaiman
author_facet Carolyn Melissa Payus
Adeline Lusat
Kui, Jun Meng
Nur Haziqah
Nurasika Basri
Norela Sulaiman
author_sort Carolyn Melissa Payus
title Comparative assessment of gravity-fed sources (rain water, ground water and hill water) quality in terms of fecal bacteria contamination from rural community area
title_short Comparative assessment of gravity-fed sources (rain water, ground water and hill water) quality in terms of fecal bacteria contamination from rural community area
title_full Comparative assessment of gravity-fed sources (rain water, ground water and hill water) quality in terms of fecal bacteria contamination from rural community area
title_fullStr Comparative assessment of gravity-fed sources (rain water, ground water and hill water) quality in terms of fecal bacteria contamination from rural community area
title_full_unstemmed Comparative assessment of gravity-fed sources (rain water, ground water and hill water) quality in terms of fecal bacteria contamination from rural community area
title_sort comparative assessment of gravity-fed sources (rain water, ground water and hill water) quality in terms of fecal bacteria contamination from rural community area
publisher Research India Publications
publishDate 2015
url https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/27520/1/Comparative%20assessment%20of%20gravity-fed%20sources%20%28rain%20water%2C%20ground%20water%20and%20hill%20water%29%20quality%20in%20terms%20of%20fecal%20bacteria%20contamination%20from%20rural%20community%20area%20ABSTRACT.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/27520/5/Comparative%20Assessment%20of%20Gravity-Fed%20Sources%20%28Rain%20Water%2C%20Ground%20Water%20and%20Hill%20Water%29%20Quality%20In%20Terms%20of%20Fecal%20Bacteria%20Contamination%20from%20Rural%20Community%20Area%20FULL%20TEXT.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/27520/
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303522640_Comparative_Assessment_of_Gravity-Fed_Sources_Rain_Water_Ground_Water_and_Hill_Water_Quality_In_Terms_of_Fecal_Bacteria_Contamination_from_Rural_Community_Area
_version_ 1760230632216068096
score 13.149126