Does investors react in long-term? The case of Malaysian acquisition

This study examines long-run stock performance for acquirers from years 2000 to 2013. Since acquisitions create agency problem and companies in Malaysia exhibit concentrated ownership structures, this study aims to investigate four major objectives which consist of the effects of family control, blo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Norhamiza Ishak, Kamarun Nisham Taufil Mohd, Hanita Kadir Shahar
Format: Article
Language:English
English
Published: Taylor & Francis 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/27391/1/Does%20investors%20react%20in%20long-term%20abstract.docx.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/27391/2/Does%20investors%20react%20in%20long%20term%20The%20case%20of%20Malaysian%20acquisition%20Fulltext.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/27391/
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1857593
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.ums.eprints.27391
record_format eprints
spelling my.ums.eprints.273912021-06-25T12:20:12Z https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/27391/ Does investors react in long-term? The case of Malaysian acquisition Norhamiza Ishak Kamarun Nisham Taufil Mohd Hanita Kadir Shahar HG Finance This study examines long-run stock performance for acquirers from years 2000 to 2013. Since acquisitions create agency problem and companies in Malaysia exhibit concentrated ownership structures, this study aims to investigate four major objectives which consist of the effects of family control, blockholder activism, board structures and deal characteristics on stock performance of acquirers. In addressing these objectives, the abnormal returns over 36 months are adopted as the proxy for the long-run stock performance, respectively. Moreover, ordinary least squares regression methods are used to examine the effects of the 16 factors on abnormal returns. The results show that Malaysian market can be considered as efficient, as most of the analyses show that the performance of acquirers does not differ from those of the matching firms. The findings imply that managers of family-controlled firms do not have to worry about investors penalizing them, as long as they engage in value-creating acquisitions. Moreover, institutional blockholders should play an active role if they want to protect their investments. Finally, investors have to realize that over the long run, there is no trading strategy that could be adopted to earn abnormal profit. Taylor & Francis 2020 Article PeerReviewed text en https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/27391/1/Does%20investors%20react%20in%20long-term%20abstract.docx.pdf text en https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/27391/2/Does%20investors%20react%20in%20long%20term%20The%20case%20of%20Malaysian%20acquisition%20Fulltext.pdf Norhamiza Ishak and Kamarun Nisham Taufil Mohd and Hanita Kadir Shahar (2020) Does investors react in long-term? The case of Malaysian acquisition. Cogent Business and Management, 7 (185759). ISSN 2331-1975 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1857593
institution Universiti Malaysia Sabah
building UMS Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Sabah
content_source UMS Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.ums.edu.my/
language English
English
topic HG Finance
spellingShingle HG Finance
Norhamiza Ishak
Kamarun Nisham Taufil Mohd
Hanita Kadir Shahar
Does investors react in long-term? The case of Malaysian acquisition
description This study examines long-run stock performance for acquirers from years 2000 to 2013. Since acquisitions create agency problem and companies in Malaysia exhibit concentrated ownership structures, this study aims to investigate four major objectives which consist of the effects of family control, blockholder activism, board structures and deal characteristics on stock performance of acquirers. In addressing these objectives, the abnormal returns over 36 months are adopted as the proxy for the long-run stock performance, respectively. Moreover, ordinary least squares regression methods are used to examine the effects of the 16 factors on abnormal returns. The results show that Malaysian market can be considered as efficient, as most of the analyses show that the performance of acquirers does not differ from those of the matching firms. The findings imply that managers of family-controlled firms do not have to worry about investors penalizing them, as long as they engage in value-creating acquisitions. Moreover, institutional blockholders should play an active role if they want to protect their investments. Finally, investors have to realize that over the long run, there is no trading strategy that could be adopted to earn abnormal profit.
format Article
author Norhamiza Ishak
Kamarun Nisham Taufil Mohd
Hanita Kadir Shahar
author_facet Norhamiza Ishak
Kamarun Nisham Taufil Mohd
Hanita Kadir Shahar
author_sort Norhamiza Ishak
title Does investors react in long-term? The case of Malaysian acquisition
title_short Does investors react in long-term? The case of Malaysian acquisition
title_full Does investors react in long-term? The case of Malaysian acquisition
title_fullStr Does investors react in long-term? The case of Malaysian acquisition
title_full_unstemmed Does investors react in long-term? The case of Malaysian acquisition
title_sort does investors react in long-term? the case of malaysian acquisition
publisher Taylor & Francis
publishDate 2020
url https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/27391/1/Does%20investors%20react%20in%20long-term%20abstract.docx.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/27391/2/Does%20investors%20react%20in%20long%20term%20The%20case%20of%20Malaysian%20acquisition%20Fulltext.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/27391/
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1857593
_version_ 1760230616705531904
score 13.149126