Simple damage model for cracked thin plate tensile test

Simple damage model was a preliminary study in order to identify the need of assessment of method for cracked thin plate because the important for safe operation and maintenance especially in oil and gas industry. This study was dividing into 2 step which is experimental and FEA analysis using MSC P...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Muhammad Izzat Shazali, Mohd Ramli
Format: Undergraduates Project Papers
Language:English
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/8339/1/CD8088_%40_74.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/8339/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.ump.umpir.8339
record_format eprints
spelling my.ump.umpir.83392021-07-09T03:54:50Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/8339/ Simple damage model for cracked thin plate tensile test Muhammad Izzat Shazali, Mohd Ramli TP Chemical technology Simple damage model was a preliminary study in order to identify the need of assessment of method for cracked thin plate because the important for safe operation and maintenance especially in oil and gas industry. This study was dividing into 2 step which is experimental and FEA analysis using MSC PATRAN Software. For this project, the Finite Element Analysis result will compare to the experiment and the parameter will be added to see the change in the coalescence load versus crack size diagram between experiment and simulation. For the experiment, the project scope was focus on the API Grade B Specimen that has been machining into ASTM E8 standard size of tensile test specimen. Crack size for the specimen has been varying into 3 different sizes which are 4mm, 6mm, and 8mm crack size in order to examine the maximum tensile stress, strain and load for different crack size of the specimen. Afterward, using MSC Marc Patran Simulation the parameter will be added to generate simple damage model equation accurately and the results of finite element analysis can simplify working process and reduce working time to do an experiment. In the analysis, the parameters used are 2mm, 4mm, 6mm and 8mm crack size and also included in the analysis the material yield strength and poisson ratio. Based on the experimental and analysis, stress versus strain graph obtained and the result of the maximum stress, strain and load for the uncrack specimen and other parameter are compared. Besides that, simple damage model equation was obtained from load versus crack size diagram in order to predict the maximum load from various size of crack by using crack as the x parameter and y as the value of maximum load from finite element analysis result. These finding led to the conclusion that the maximum load are proportional to the crack size which is bigger the crack size of the specimen, the maximum load are decreased 2012-06 Undergraduates Project Papers NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/8339/1/CD8088_%40_74.pdf Muhammad Izzat Shazali, Mohd Ramli (2012) Simple damage model for cracked thin plate tensile test. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering , Universiti Malaysia Pahang.
institution Universiti Malaysia Pahang
building UMP Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Pahang
content_source UMP Institutional Repository
url_provider http://umpir.ump.edu.my/
language English
topic TP Chemical technology
spellingShingle TP Chemical technology
Muhammad Izzat Shazali, Mohd Ramli
Simple damage model for cracked thin plate tensile test
description Simple damage model was a preliminary study in order to identify the need of assessment of method for cracked thin plate because the important for safe operation and maintenance especially in oil and gas industry. This study was dividing into 2 step which is experimental and FEA analysis using MSC PATRAN Software. For this project, the Finite Element Analysis result will compare to the experiment and the parameter will be added to see the change in the coalescence load versus crack size diagram between experiment and simulation. For the experiment, the project scope was focus on the API Grade B Specimen that has been machining into ASTM E8 standard size of tensile test specimen. Crack size for the specimen has been varying into 3 different sizes which are 4mm, 6mm, and 8mm crack size in order to examine the maximum tensile stress, strain and load for different crack size of the specimen. Afterward, using MSC Marc Patran Simulation the parameter will be added to generate simple damage model equation accurately and the results of finite element analysis can simplify working process and reduce working time to do an experiment. In the analysis, the parameters used are 2mm, 4mm, 6mm and 8mm crack size and also included in the analysis the material yield strength and poisson ratio. Based on the experimental and analysis, stress versus strain graph obtained and the result of the maximum stress, strain and load for the uncrack specimen and other parameter are compared. Besides that, simple damage model equation was obtained from load versus crack size diagram in order to predict the maximum load from various size of crack by using crack as the x parameter and y as the value of maximum load from finite element analysis result. These finding led to the conclusion that the maximum load are proportional to the crack size which is bigger the crack size of the specimen, the maximum load are decreased
format Undergraduates Project Papers
author Muhammad Izzat Shazali, Mohd Ramli
author_facet Muhammad Izzat Shazali, Mohd Ramli
author_sort Muhammad Izzat Shazali, Mohd Ramli
title Simple damage model for cracked thin plate tensile test
title_short Simple damage model for cracked thin plate tensile test
title_full Simple damage model for cracked thin plate tensile test
title_fullStr Simple damage model for cracked thin plate tensile test
title_full_unstemmed Simple damage model for cracked thin plate tensile test
title_sort simple damage model for cracked thin plate tensile test
publishDate 2012
url http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/8339/1/CD8088_%40_74.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/8339/
_version_ 1705056960941916160
score 13.160551