Comparison between ziegler-nichols and cohen-coon method for controller tunings

Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) controllers are the predominant types of feedback control. PID controller is widely used in industry due to their simplicity and easy to tuning. For controller tuning, the PID parameters are tuned by any conventional method in order to assure a good reference s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mohd Fadzli, Mohd Noris
Format: Undergraduates Project Papers
Language:English
Published: 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/540/1/01.Comparison%20between%20ziegler-nichols%20and%20cohen-coon%20method%20for%20controller%20tunings.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/540/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.ump.umpir.540
record_format eprints
spelling my.ump.umpir.5402023-08-14T06:34:15Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/540/ Comparison between ziegler-nichols and cohen-coon method for controller tunings Mohd Fadzli, Mohd Noris TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) controllers are the predominant types of feedback control. PID controller is widely used in industry due to their simplicity and easy to tuning. For controller tuning, the PID parameters are tuned by any conventional method in order to assure a good reference signal to the closed loop system is obtained by filtering appropriately the set-point step signal. This study is conducted to get the optimum PID controller parameters (,,cIDKττ) for first order process model. Two well known methods; Ziegler-Nichols (Z-N) method and Cohen-Coon (C-C) are used to tune controller. Both methods are compared to get the optimum condition for the process model with one-quarter decay ratio at minimum settling time and minimum largest error. The responses for both methods are analyzed using Simulink in MATLAB software. Block diagram for the process model with controllers was created for simulation process. Kc= 16.667, Iτ =6.283 and Dτ =1.571 are optimum parameters setting for Ziegler-Nichols method and the minimum largest error as 0.582 and minimum settling time equal with 11.8s in sample 11. For Cohen-Coon method, Kc= 14.703, Iτ =3.622 and Dτ =0.541 are optimum parameters setting. The minimum largest error and minimum settling time from response in sample 39 are 0.4914 and 12.2s. The results indicated that responses using Cohen-Coon tuning are slightly better than those with the Ziegler-Nichols settings method. 2006-11 Undergraduates Project Papers NonPeerReviewed pdf en http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/540/1/01.Comparison%20between%20ziegler-nichols%20and%20cohen-coon%20method%20for%20controller%20tunings.pdf Mohd Fadzli, Mohd Noris (2006) Comparison between ziegler-nichols and cohen-coon method for controller tunings. Faculty of Chemical & Natural Resources Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Pahang.
institution Universiti Malaysia Pahang
building UMP Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Pahang
content_source UMP Institutional Repository
url_provider http://umpir.ump.edu.my/
language English
topic TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
spellingShingle TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
Mohd Fadzli, Mohd Noris
Comparison between ziegler-nichols and cohen-coon method for controller tunings
description Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) controllers are the predominant types of feedback control. PID controller is widely used in industry due to their simplicity and easy to tuning. For controller tuning, the PID parameters are tuned by any conventional method in order to assure a good reference signal to the closed loop system is obtained by filtering appropriately the set-point step signal. This study is conducted to get the optimum PID controller parameters (,,cIDKττ) for first order process model. Two well known methods; Ziegler-Nichols (Z-N) method and Cohen-Coon (C-C) are used to tune controller. Both methods are compared to get the optimum condition for the process model with one-quarter decay ratio at minimum settling time and minimum largest error. The responses for both methods are analyzed using Simulink in MATLAB software. Block diagram for the process model with controllers was created for simulation process. Kc= 16.667, Iτ =6.283 and Dτ =1.571 are optimum parameters setting for Ziegler-Nichols method and the minimum largest error as 0.582 and minimum settling time equal with 11.8s in sample 11. For Cohen-Coon method, Kc= 14.703, Iτ =3.622 and Dτ =0.541 are optimum parameters setting. The minimum largest error and minimum settling time from response in sample 39 are 0.4914 and 12.2s. The results indicated that responses using Cohen-Coon tuning are slightly better than those with the Ziegler-Nichols settings method.
format Undergraduates Project Papers
author Mohd Fadzli, Mohd Noris
author_facet Mohd Fadzli, Mohd Noris
author_sort Mohd Fadzli, Mohd Noris
title Comparison between ziegler-nichols and cohen-coon method for controller tunings
title_short Comparison between ziegler-nichols and cohen-coon method for controller tunings
title_full Comparison between ziegler-nichols and cohen-coon method for controller tunings
title_fullStr Comparison between ziegler-nichols and cohen-coon method for controller tunings
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between ziegler-nichols and cohen-coon method for controller tunings
title_sort comparison between ziegler-nichols and cohen-coon method for controller tunings
publishDate 2006
url http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/540/1/01.Comparison%20between%20ziegler-nichols%20and%20cohen-coon%20method%20for%20controller%20tunings.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/540/
_version_ 1775622206473109504
score 13.211869