Strength of kaolinitic clay soil stabilized with lime and palm oil fuel ash

The use of palm oil fuel ash (POFA) mixed with lime as a catalyst in soil stabilization can significantly improve the stability of problematic soils and improve their engineering properties. Problematic soils can obstruct the construction process due to its low strength and low bearing capacity. In...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Muhammad Syamsul Imran, Zaini, Muzamir, Hasan, Wafiyuddin, Md Jariman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit UMP 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/41862/1/Strength%20of%20Kaolinitic%20Clay%20Soil%20Stabilized%20with%20Lime%20and%20Palm%20Oil%20Fuel%20Ash.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/41862/
https://doi.org/10.15282/construction.v4i1.10517
https://doi.org/10.15282/construction.v4i1.10517
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.ump.umpir.41862
record_format eprints
spelling my.ump.umpir.418622024-10-08T07:20:35Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/41862/ Strength of kaolinitic clay soil stabilized with lime and palm oil fuel ash Muhammad Syamsul Imran, Zaini Muzamir, Hasan Wafiyuddin, Md Jariman TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TH Building construction The use of palm oil fuel ash (POFA) mixed with lime as a catalyst in soil stabilization can significantly improve the stability of problematic soils and improve their engineering properties. Problematic soils can obstruct the construction process due to its low strength and low bearing capacity. In this study, various laboratory tests were carried out to determine the engineering properties of the soil’s mixture which includes Atterberg limit, particle size distribution, compaction, and unconfined compression test. 4%, 8% and 12% POFA were mixed with 6% hydrated lime to stabilized the kaolinitic clay soil at different curing days (1, 7, 14, and 30 days). Compared to untreated kaolin, the addition of POFA plus lime resulted in higher undrained shear strength. The maximum undrained shear strength (USS) is 32.68kN/m2, which was obtained on the 30th day of curing with the optimal mixture of stabilized kaolin which is kaolin mixed 6% of lime and 12% of POFA. The unconfined compressive strength increased by 185.04% compared to the unconfined compressive strength of untreated kaolinitic clay with a value of 65.36 kN/m2. This proves that kaolin stabilized with lime and POFA can increase the strength parameters of clay, thus reducing construction costs for soil stabilization and reducing environmental issues. Penerbit UMP 2024-04 Article PeerReviewed pdf en cc_by_nc_4 http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/41862/1/Strength%20of%20Kaolinitic%20Clay%20Soil%20Stabilized%20with%20Lime%20and%20Palm%20Oil%20Fuel%20Ash.pdf Muhammad Syamsul Imran, Zaini and Muzamir, Hasan and Wafiyuddin, Md Jariman (2024) Strength of kaolinitic clay soil stabilized with lime and palm oil fuel ash. Construction, 4 (1). pp. 77-84. ISSN 2785-8731. (Published) https://doi.org/10.15282/construction.v4i1.10517 https://doi.org/10.15282/construction.v4i1.10517
institution Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah
building UMPSA Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah
content_source UMPSA Institutional Repository
url_provider http://umpir.ump.edu.my/
language English
topic TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TH Building construction
spellingShingle TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TH Building construction
Muhammad Syamsul Imran, Zaini
Muzamir, Hasan
Wafiyuddin, Md Jariman
Strength of kaolinitic clay soil stabilized with lime and palm oil fuel ash
description The use of palm oil fuel ash (POFA) mixed with lime as a catalyst in soil stabilization can significantly improve the stability of problematic soils and improve their engineering properties. Problematic soils can obstruct the construction process due to its low strength and low bearing capacity. In this study, various laboratory tests were carried out to determine the engineering properties of the soil’s mixture which includes Atterberg limit, particle size distribution, compaction, and unconfined compression test. 4%, 8% and 12% POFA were mixed with 6% hydrated lime to stabilized the kaolinitic clay soil at different curing days (1, 7, 14, and 30 days). Compared to untreated kaolin, the addition of POFA plus lime resulted in higher undrained shear strength. The maximum undrained shear strength (USS) is 32.68kN/m2, which was obtained on the 30th day of curing with the optimal mixture of stabilized kaolin which is kaolin mixed 6% of lime and 12% of POFA. The unconfined compressive strength increased by 185.04% compared to the unconfined compressive strength of untreated kaolinitic clay with a value of 65.36 kN/m2. This proves that kaolin stabilized with lime and POFA can increase the strength parameters of clay, thus reducing construction costs for soil stabilization and reducing environmental issues.
format Article
author Muhammad Syamsul Imran, Zaini
Muzamir, Hasan
Wafiyuddin, Md Jariman
author_facet Muhammad Syamsul Imran, Zaini
Muzamir, Hasan
Wafiyuddin, Md Jariman
author_sort Muhammad Syamsul Imran, Zaini
title Strength of kaolinitic clay soil stabilized with lime and palm oil fuel ash
title_short Strength of kaolinitic clay soil stabilized with lime and palm oil fuel ash
title_full Strength of kaolinitic clay soil stabilized with lime and palm oil fuel ash
title_fullStr Strength of kaolinitic clay soil stabilized with lime and palm oil fuel ash
title_full_unstemmed Strength of kaolinitic clay soil stabilized with lime and palm oil fuel ash
title_sort strength of kaolinitic clay soil stabilized with lime and palm oil fuel ash
publisher Penerbit UMP
publishDate 2024
url http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/41862/1/Strength%20of%20Kaolinitic%20Clay%20Soil%20Stabilized%20with%20Lime%20and%20Palm%20Oil%20Fuel%20Ash.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/41862/
https://doi.org/10.15282/construction.v4i1.10517
https://doi.org/10.15282/construction.v4i1.10517
_version_ 1822924679042564096
score 13.235796