Rare Earth Extraction using Solvent Extraction: Which Factor Has the Most Significant Impact?

Using a two-level factorial design, a study was undertaken to change the parameters impacting the recovery of rare earth from rare earth mixture. The experimental design was used to screen and identify the major contributing aspects to rare earth recovery. The experiment aims to isolate samarium fro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nurul Ain, Ismail
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit Universiti Malaysia Pahang 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/35845/1/Rare%20Earth%20Extraction%20using%20Solvent%20Extraction%20Which%20Factor%20has%20the%20Most%20Significant%20Impact_.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/35845/
https://doi.org/10.15282/ijets.7.2.2020.1007
https://doi.org/10.15282/ijets.7.2.2020.1007
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.ump.umpir.35845
record_format eprints
spelling my.ump.umpir.358452022-12-06T02:50:00Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/35845/ Rare Earth Extraction using Solvent Extraction: Which Factor Has the Most Significant Impact? Nurul Ain, Ismail TP Chemical technology Using a two-level factorial design, a study was undertaken to change the parameters impacting the recovery of rare earth from rare earth mixture. The experimental design was used to screen and identify the major contributing aspects to rare earth recovery. The experiment aims to isolate samarium from a mixture of samarium, europium, and gadolinium. Factors involved consist of pH (pH 1 and pH 6), acid type (nitric acid and hydrochloric acid) and concentration (1.0M and 5.0M), mixing duration (30 min and 120 min), feed composition (20% samarium and 80% samarium), type of diluent (hexane and chloroform), temperature (room temperature and 60°C) and organic to aqueous phase ratio (1:1 and 2:1). The results showed that the samarium recovery was in the range of 0.98% to 90.88%. Based on analysis variance (ANOVA), five factors significantly affect the samarium recovery out of eight factors explored. The five factors according to the most significant order are pH> feed composition> organic to aqueous phase ratio>acid concentration>acid type>mixing duration>type of diluent> temperature. Statistical analysis shows that the linear model is significant, with the value of R2 is 0.9886. Based on the statistical data, five significant variables influence the separation of samarium. This research shows that two-level factorial design can anticipate significant variables impacting rare earth separation, particularly samarium, in the solvent extraction process. Penerbit Universiti Malaysia Pahang 2020 Article PeerReviewed pdf en http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/35845/1/Rare%20Earth%20Extraction%20using%20Solvent%20Extraction%20Which%20Factor%20has%20the%20Most%20Significant%20Impact_.pdf Nurul Ain, Ismail (2020) Rare Earth Extraction using Solvent Extraction: Which Factor Has the Most Significant Impact? International Journal of Engineering Technology And Sciences (IJETS), 7 (2). pp. 86-93. ISSN 2289-697X https://doi.org/10.15282/ijets.7.2.2020.1007 https://doi.org/10.15282/ijets.7.2.2020.1007
institution Universiti Malaysia Pahang
building UMP Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Pahang
content_source UMP Institutional Repository
url_provider http://umpir.ump.edu.my/
language English
topic TP Chemical technology
spellingShingle TP Chemical technology
Nurul Ain, Ismail
Rare Earth Extraction using Solvent Extraction: Which Factor Has the Most Significant Impact?
description Using a two-level factorial design, a study was undertaken to change the parameters impacting the recovery of rare earth from rare earth mixture. The experimental design was used to screen and identify the major contributing aspects to rare earth recovery. The experiment aims to isolate samarium from a mixture of samarium, europium, and gadolinium. Factors involved consist of pH (pH 1 and pH 6), acid type (nitric acid and hydrochloric acid) and concentration (1.0M and 5.0M), mixing duration (30 min and 120 min), feed composition (20% samarium and 80% samarium), type of diluent (hexane and chloroform), temperature (room temperature and 60°C) and organic to aqueous phase ratio (1:1 and 2:1). The results showed that the samarium recovery was in the range of 0.98% to 90.88%. Based on analysis variance (ANOVA), five factors significantly affect the samarium recovery out of eight factors explored. The five factors according to the most significant order are pH> feed composition> organic to aqueous phase ratio>acid concentration>acid type>mixing duration>type of diluent> temperature. Statistical analysis shows that the linear model is significant, with the value of R2 is 0.9886. Based on the statistical data, five significant variables influence the separation of samarium. This research shows that two-level factorial design can anticipate significant variables impacting rare earth separation, particularly samarium, in the solvent extraction process.
format Article
author Nurul Ain, Ismail
author_facet Nurul Ain, Ismail
author_sort Nurul Ain, Ismail
title Rare Earth Extraction using Solvent Extraction: Which Factor Has the Most Significant Impact?
title_short Rare Earth Extraction using Solvent Extraction: Which Factor Has the Most Significant Impact?
title_full Rare Earth Extraction using Solvent Extraction: Which Factor Has the Most Significant Impact?
title_fullStr Rare Earth Extraction using Solvent Extraction: Which Factor Has the Most Significant Impact?
title_full_unstemmed Rare Earth Extraction using Solvent Extraction: Which Factor Has the Most Significant Impact?
title_sort rare earth extraction using solvent extraction: which factor has the most significant impact?
publisher Penerbit Universiti Malaysia Pahang
publishDate 2020
url http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/35845/1/Rare%20Earth%20Extraction%20using%20Solvent%20Extraction%20Which%20Factor%20has%20the%20Most%20Significant%20Impact_.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/35845/
https://doi.org/10.15282/ijets.7.2.2020.1007
https://doi.org/10.15282/ijets.7.2.2020.1007
_version_ 1751536408122621952
score 13.209306