Analysis of measurement and calculation of MSD complaint of chassis assembly workers using OWAS, RULA and REBA method
Car assembly is a combination of all components that form one completed vehicle unit. The work process is manually done and repeatedly, which contributes to a risk of musculoskeletal disorders (MSD). Chassis assembly is a job with a high level of complexity and associated with MSD risk for its emplo...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Penerbit Universiti Malaysia Pahang
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/34606/1/Analysis%20of%20measurement%20and%20calculation%20of%20MSD%20complaint.pdf http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/34606/ https://doi.org/10.15282/ijame.19.2.2022.05.0747 https://doi.org/10.15282/ijame.19.2.2022.05.0747 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.ump.umpir.34606 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.ump.umpir.346062022-07-07T06:18:36Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/34606/ Analysis of measurement and calculation of MSD complaint of chassis assembly workers using OWAS, RULA and REBA method Nelfiyanti, . N. M. Zuki, N. M. M. F. F., Ab Rashid TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery TL Motor vehicles. Aeronautics. Astronautics Car assembly is a combination of all components that form one completed vehicle unit. The work process is manually done and repeatedly, which contributes to a risk of musculoskeletal disorders (MSD). Chassis assembly is a job with a high level of complexity and associated with MSD risk for its employees. This study consists of 30 assembly activities divided into six groups based on posture and working methods used during the work process. Group A consists of 7 assemblies, Group B consists of 8 assemblies, Group C consists of 5 assemblies, Group D consists of 2 assemblies, Group E consists of 5 assemblies, and Group F consists of 3 assemblies. This study aims to compare the measurement and calculation of the risk level of MSD workers by using the RULA, REBA, and OWAS methods. The results of the measurements and computations acquired using these three approaches yielded the same risk category: 83.33 % medium risk/dangerous in working groups A, C, D, E, and F, and 16.67 % very high risk/highly hazardous in working group B. These six groups, particularly group B, requires immediate attention to reduce worker complaints of MSD. Penerbit Universiti Malaysia Pahang 2022-06 Article PeerReviewed pdf en cc_by_4 http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/34606/1/Analysis%20of%20measurement%20and%20calculation%20of%20MSD%20complaint.pdf Nelfiyanti, . and N. M. Zuki, N. M. and M. F. F., Ab Rashid (2022) Analysis of measurement and calculation of MSD complaint of chassis assembly workers using OWAS, RULA and REBA method. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering (IJAME), 19 (2). 9681 -9692. ISSN 2180-1606 https://doi.org/10.15282/ijame.19.2.2022.05.0747 https://doi.org/10.15282/ijame.19.2.2022.05.0747 |
institution |
Universiti Malaysia Pahang |
building |
UMP Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Malaysia Pahang |
content_source |
UMP Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/ |
language |
English |
topic |
TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery TL Motor vehicles. Aeronautics. Astronautics |
spellingShingle |
TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery TL Motor vehicles. Aeronautics. Astronautics Nelfiyanti, . N. M. Zuki, N. M. M. F. F., Ab Rashid Analysis of measurement and calculation of MSD complaint of chassis assembly workers using OWAS, RULA and REBA method |
description |
Car assembly is a combination of all components that form one completed vehicle unit. The work process is manually done and repeatedly, which contributes to a risk of musculoskeletal disorders (MSD). Chassis assembly is a job with a high level of complexity and associated with MSD risk for its employees. This study consists of 30 assembly activities divided into six groups based on posture and working methods used during the work process. Group A consists of 7 assemblies, Group B consists of 8 assemblies, Group C consists of 5 assemblies, Group D consists of 2 assemblies, Group E consists of 5 assemblies, and Group F consists of 3 assemblies. This study aims to compare the measurement and calculation of the risk level of MSD workers by using the RULA, REBA, and OWAS methods. The results of the measurements and computations acquired using these three approaches yielded the same risk category: 83.33 % medium risk/dangerous in working groups A, C, D, E, and F, and 16.67 % very high risk/highly hazardous in working group B. These six groups, particularly group B, requires immediate attention to reduce worker complaints of MSD. |
format |
Article |
author |
Nelfiyanti, . N. M. Zuki, N. M. M. F. F., Ab Rashid |
author_facet |
Nelfiyanti, . N. M. Zuki, N. M. M. F. F., Ab Rashid |
author_sort |
Nelfiyanti, . |
title |
Analysis of measurement and calculation of MSD complaint of chassis assembly workers using OWAS, RULA and REBA method |
title_short |
Analysis of measurement and calculation of MSD complaint of chassis assembly workers using OWAS, RULA and REBA method |
title_full |
Analysis of measurement and calculation of MSD complaint of chassis assembly workers using OWAS, RULA and REBA method |
title_fullStr |
Analysis of measurement and calculation of MSD complaint of chassis assembly workers using OWAS, RULA and REBA method |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis of measurement and calculation of MSD complaint of chassis assembly workers using OWAS, RULA and REBA method |
title_sort |
analysis of measurement and calculation of msd complaint of chassis assembly workers using owas, rula and reba method |
publisher |
Penerbit Universiti Malaysia Pahang |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/34606/1/Analysis%20of%20measurement%20and%20calculation%20of%20MSD%20complaint.pdf http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/34606/ https://doi.org/10.15282/ijame.19.2.2022.05.0747 https://doi.org/10.15282/ijame.19.2.2022.05.0747 |
_version_ |
1738510520970903552 |
score |
13.18916 |