Economic assessment of bioethanol recovery using membrane distillation for food waste fermentation

Ethanol is a material that has a high demand from different industries such as fuel, beverages, and other industrial applications. Commonly, ethanol has been produced from yeast fermentation using sugar crops as a feedstock. However, food waste (FW) was found to be one of the promising resources to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Noor Intan Shafinas, Muhammad, Rosentrater, Kurt A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/30476/1/Economic%20assessment%20of%20bioethanol%20recovery%20using%20membrane%20distillation.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/30476/
https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering7010015
https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering7010015
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.ump.umpir.30476
record_format eprints
spelling my.ump.umpir.304762021-06-30T14:27:11Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/30476/ Economic assessment of bioethanol recovery using membrane distillation for food waste fermentation Noor Intan Shafinas, Muhammad Rosentrater, Kurt A. TP Chemical technology Ethanol is a material that has a high demand from different industries such as fuel, beverages, and other industrial applications. Commonly, ethanol has been produced from yeast fermentation using sugar crops as a feedstock. However, food waste (FW) was found to be one of the promising resources to produce ethanol because it contained a higher amount of glucose. Generally, column distillation has been used to separate ethanol from the fermentation broth, but this operation is considered an energy-intensive process. On the contrary, membrane distillation is expected to be more practical and cost-effective because of its lower energy requirement. Therefore, this study aims to make a comparison of economic performance on FW fermentation with membrane distillation and a conventional distillation system using techno-economy analysis (TEA) method. A commercial-scale FW fermentation plant was modeled using SuperPro Designer V9.0 Modeling. Discounted cash flow analysis was employed to determine ethanol minimum selling price (MSP) for both distillation systems at 10% of the internal rate of return. Results from this analysis showed that membrane distillation has a higher MSP than a conventional process, $6.24 and $2.41 per gallon ($1.65 and $0.64 per liter) respectively. Hence, this study found that membrane distillation is not economical to be implemented in commercial-scale ethanol production. MDPI AG 2020-02-11 Article PeerReviewed pdf en cc_by_4 http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/30476/1/Economic%20assessment%20of%20bioethanol%20recovery%20using%20membrane%20distillation.pdf Noor Intan Shafinas, Muhammad and Rosentrater, Kurt A. (2020) Economic assessment of bioethanol recovery using membrane distillation for food waste fermentation. Bioengineering, 7 (1). pp. 1-10. ISSN 2306-5354 https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering7010015 https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering7010015
institution Universiti Malaysia Pahang
building UMP Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Pahang
content_source UMP Institutional Repository
url_provider http://umpir.ump.edu.my/
language English
topic TP Chemical technology
spellingShingle TP Chemical technology
Noor Intan Shafinas, Muhammad
Rosentrater, Kurt A.
Economic assessment of bioethanol recovery using membrane distillation for food waste fermentation
description Ethanol is a material that has a high demand from different industries such as fuel, beverages, and other industrial applications. Commonly, ethanol has been produced from yeast fermentation using sugar crops as a feedstock. However, food waste (FW) was found to be one of the promising resources to produce ethanol because it contained a higher amount of glucose. Generally, column distillation has been used to separate ethanol from the fermentation broth, but this operation is considered an energy-intensive process. On the contrary, membrane distillation is expected to be more practical and cost-effective because of its lower energy requirement. Therefore, this study aims to make a comparison of economic performance on FW fermentation with membrane distillation and a conventional distillation system using techno-economy analysis (TEA) method. A commercial-scale FW fermentation plant was modeled using SuperPro Designer V9.0 Modeling. Discounted cash flow analysis was employed to determine ethanol minimum selling price (MSP) for both distillation systems at 10% of the internal rate of return. Results from this analysis showed that membrane distillation has a higher MSP than a conventional process, $6.24 and $2.41 per gallon ($1.65 and $0.64 per liter) respectively. Hence, this study found that membrane distillation is not economical to be implemented in commercial-scale ethanol production.
format Article
author Noor Intan Shafinas, Muhammad
Rosentrater, Kurt A.
author_facet Noor Intan Shafinas, Muhammad
Rosentrater, Kurt A.
author_sort Noor Intan Shafinas, Muhammad
title Economic assessment of bioethanol recovery using membrane distillation for food waste fermentation
title_short Economic assessment of bioethanol recovery using membrane distillation for food waste fermentation
title_full Economic assessment of bioethanol recovery using membrane distillation for food waste fermentation
title_fullStr Economic assessment of bioethanol recovery using membrane distillation for food waste fermentation
title_full_unstemmed Economic assessment of bioethanol recovery using membrane distillation for food waste fermentation
title_sort economic assessment of bioethanol recovery using membrane distillation for food waste fermentation
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2020
url http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/30476/1/Economic%20assessment%20of%20bioethanol%20recovery%20using%20membrane%20distillation.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/30476/
https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering7010015
https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering7010015
_version_ 1705057016099110912
score 13.160551