Economic assessment of bioethanol recovery using membrane distillation for food waste fermentation
Ethanol is a material that has a high demand from different industries such as fuel, beverages, and other industrial applications. Commonly, ethanol has been produced from yeast fermentation using sugar crops as a feedstock. However, food waste (FW) was found to be one of the promising resources to...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/30476/1/Economic%20assessment%20of%20bioethanol%20recovery%20using%20membrane%20distillation.pdf http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/30476/ https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering7010015 https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering7010015 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.ump.umpir.30476 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.ump.umpir.304762021-06-30T14:27:11Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/30476/ Economic assessment of bioethanol recovery using membrane distillation for food waste fermentation Noor Intan Shafinas, Muhammad Rosentrater, Kurt A. TP Chemical technology Ethanol is a material that has a high demand from different industries such as fuel, beverages, and other industrial applications. Commonly, ethanol has been produced from yeast fermentation using sugar crops as a feedstock. However, food waste (FW) was found to be one of the promising resources to produce ethanol because it contained a higher amount of glucose. Generally, column distillation has been used to separate ethanol from the fermentation broth, but this operation is considered an energy-intensive process. On the contrary, membrane distillation is expected to be more practical and cost-effective because of its lower energy requirement. Therefore, this study aims to make a comparison of economic performance on FW fermentation with membrane distillation and a conventional distillation system using techno-economy analysis (TEA) method. A commercial-scale FW fermentation plant was modeled using SuperPro Designer V9.0 Modeling. Discounted cash flow analysis was employed to determine ethanol minimum selling price (MSP) for both distillation systems at 10% of the internal rate of return. Results from this analysis showed that membrane distillation has a higher MSP than a conventional process, $6.24 and $2.41 per gallon ($1.65 and $0.64 per liter) respectively. Hence, this study found that membrane distillation is not economical to be implemented in commercial-scale ethanol production. MDPI AG 2020-02-11 Article PeerReviewed pdf en cc_by_4 http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/30476/1/Economic%20assessment%20of%20bioethanol%20recovery%20using%20membrane%20distillation.pdf Noor Intan Shafinas, Muhammad and Rosentrater, Kurt A. (2020) Economic assessment of bioethanol recovery using membrane distillation for food waste fermentation. Bioengineering, 7 (1). pp. 1-10. ISSN 2306-5354 https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering7010015 https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering7010015 |
institution |
Universiti Malaysia Pahang |
building |
UMP Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Malaysia Pahang |
content_source |
UMP Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/ |
language |
English |
topic |
TP Chemical technology |
spellingShingle |
TP Chemical technology Noor Intan Shafinas, Muhammad Rosentrater, Kurt A. Economic assessment of bioethanol recovery using membrane distillation for food waste fermentation |
description |
Ethanol is a material that has a high demand from different industries such as fuel, beverages, and other industrial applications. Commonly, ethanol has been produced from yeast fermentation using sugar crops as a feedstock. However, food waste (FW) was found to be one of the promising resources to produce ethanol because it contained a higher amount of glucose. Generally, column distillation has been used to separate ethanol from the fermentation broth, but this operation is considered an energy-intensive process. On the contrary, membrane distillation is expected to be more practical and cost-effective because of its lower energy requirement. Therefore, this study aims to make a comparison of economic performance on FW fermentation with membrane distillation and a conventional distillation system using techno-economy analysis (TEA) method. A commercial-scale FW fermentation plant was modeled using SuperPro Designer V9.0 Modeling. Discounted cash flow analysis was employed to determine ethanol minimum selling price (MSP) for both distillation systems at 10% of the internal rate of return. Results from this analysis showed that membrane distillation has a higher MSP than a conventional process, $6.24 and $2.41 per gallon ($1.65 and $0.64 per liter) respectively. Hence, this study found that membrane distillation is not economical to be implemented in commercial-scale ethanol production. |
format |
Article |
author |
Noor Intan Shafinas, Muhammad Rosentrater, Kurt A. |
author_facet |
Noor Intan Shafinas, Muhammad Rosentrater, Kurt A. |
author_sort |
Noor Intan Shafinas, Muhammad |
title |
Economic assessment of bioethanol recovery using membrane distillation for food waste fermentation |
title_short |
Economic assessment of bioethanol recovery using membrane distillation for food waste fermentation |
title_full |
Economic assessment of bioethanol recovery using membrane distillation for food waste fermentation |
title_fullStr |
Economic assessment of bioethanol recovery using membrane distillation for food waste fermentation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Economic assessment of bioethanol recovery using membrane distillation for food waste fermentation |
title_sort |
economic assessment of bioethanol recovery using membrane distillation for food waste fermentation |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/30476/1/Economic%20assessment%20of%20bioethanol%20recovery%20using%20membrane%20distillation.pdf http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/30476/ https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering7010015 https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering7010015 |
_version_ |
1705057016099110912 |
score |
13.160551 |