Key drivers for adopting design build: A comparative study between project stakeholders

The construction industry recognizes the need for a relationship-based procurement by considering the stakeholders to promote the right project delivery method. Design-Build (D-B) is an alternative procurement method that can overcome the incompleteness of Design-Bid-Build(D-B-B) in delivering const...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lee, Z. P., A. R., Rahimi, Doh, Shu Ing
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier Ltd. 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/29939/
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2020.102945
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2020.102945
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.ump.umpir.29939
record_format eprints
spelling my.ump.umpir.299392020-11-12T00:56:07Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/29939/ Key drivers for adopting design build: A comparative study between project stakeholders Lee, Z. P. A. R., Rahimi Doh, Shu Ing TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TH Building construction The construction industry recognizes the need for a relationship-based procurement by considering the stakeholders to promote the right project delivery method. Design-Build (D-B) is an alternative procurement method that can overcome the incompleteness of Design-Bid-Build(D-B-B) in delivering construction projects. D-B is becoming more common in the United States, China, and Japan, but numerous construction projects are still practicing D-B-B. Hence, understanding the drivers of D-B adoption among project stakeholders can determine the root cause for the acceptance or rejection of D-B. This study aims to compare the key drivers for D-Badoption among the three main stakeholders, namely client, consultant, and contractor. Toachieve that objective, this study analyzes survey data from 111 professionals with D-B project-related experiences. The results reveal sixteen D-B drivers that affect the stakeholders’ decision to adopt D-B. From the sixteen D-B drivers, the specific key D-B drivers for consultants are “interest in the design-build,” “reduce works variations,” and “better track record.” Conversely, “better project pricing” and “greater allocation of risks to contractors” are the specific key D-B drivers for clients and contractors, respectively. This study contributes to the existing literature on D-B by investigating the inter-relationships between D-B drivers of project stakeholders. The key D-B drivers can help researchers to formulate strategies to improve D-B adoption. The research findings could enhance the understanding of D-B drivers by providing a valuable reference for stakeholders to promote D-B in the construction industry. Elsevier Ltd. 2020 Article PeerReviewed Lee, Z. P. and A. R., Rahimi and Doh, Shu Ing (2020) Key drivers for adopting design build: A comparative study between project stakeholders. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C (102945). ISSN 1474-7065 (In Press) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2020.102945 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2020.102945
institution Universiti Malaysia Pahang
building UMP Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Pahang
content_source UMP Institutional Repository
url_provider http://umpir.ump.edu.my/
topic TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TH Building construction
spellingShingle TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TH Building construction
Lee, Z. P.
A. R., Rahimi
Doh, Shu Ing
Key drivers for adopting design build: A comparative study between project stakeholders
description The construction industry recognizes the need for a relationship-based procurement by considering the stakeholders to promote the right project delivery method. Design-Build (D-B) is an alternative procurement method that can overcome the incompleteness of Design-Bid-Build(D-B-B) in delivering construction projects. D-B is becoming more common in the United States, China, and Japan, but numerous construction projects are still practicing D-B-B. Hence, understanding the drivers of D-B adoption among project stakeholders can determine the root cause for the acceptance or rejection of D-B. This study aims to compare the key drivers for D-Badoption among the three main stakeholders, namely client, consultant, and contractor. Toachieve that objective, this study analyzes survey data from 111 professionals with D-B project-related experiences. The results reveal sixteen D-B drivers that affect the stakeholders’ decision to adopt D-B. From the sixteen D-B drivers, the specific key D-B drivers for consultants are “interest in the design-build,” “reduce works variations,” and “better track record.” Conversely, “better project pricing” and “greater allocation of risks to contractors” are the specific key D-B drivers for clients and contractors, respectively. This study contributes to the existing literature on D-B by investigating the inter-relationships between D-B drivers of project stakeholders. The key D-B drivers can help researchers to formulate strategies to improve D-B adoption. The research findings could enhance the understanding of D-B drivers by providing a valuable reference for stakeholders to promote D-B in the construction industry.
format Article
author Lee, Z. P.
A. R., Rahimi
Doh, Shu Ing
author_facet Lee, Z. P.
A. R., Rahimi
Doh, Shu Ing
author_sort Lee, Z. P.
title Key drivers for adopting design build: A comparative study between project stakeholders
title_short Key drivers for adopting design build: A comparative study between project stakeholders
title_full Key drivers for adopting design build: A comparative study between project stakeholders
title_fullStr Key drivers for adopting design build: A comparative study between project stakeholders
title_full_unstemmed Key drivers for adopting design build: A comparative study between project stakeholders
title_sort key drivers for adopting design build: a comparative study between project stakeholders
publisher Elsevier Ltd.
publishDate 2020
url http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/29939/
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2020.102945
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2020.102945
_version_ 1683230944175063040
score 13.19449