Microstructure and structural analysis of polypropylene fibre reinforced reactive powder concrete beams exposed to elevated temperature
Despite the superior properties of reactive powder concrete (RPC), the possibility of spalling under fire conditions still exists, which can lead to a significant reduction in the fire endurance of reinforced concrete members. This study investigates the efficiency of using the different percentages...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier Ltd
2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/27771/1/Microstructure%20and%20structural%20analysis%20of%20polypropylene%20fibre%20reinforced%20.pdf http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/27771/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.101167 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.101167 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Despite the superior properties of reactive powder concrete (RPC), the possibility of spalling under fire conditions still exists, which can lead to a significant reduction in the fire endurance of reinforced concrete members. This study investigates the efficiency of using the different percentages of polypropylene fibres (PPFs) for enhancing the fire resistance of reinforced beams made from RPC. Five RPC beams were tested by applying two concentrated loads. One of them (without PPFs) was tested under monotonic load up to failure. The other four beams were subjected to service load, and then controlled fire was applied for 120 min in accordance with the fire temperature vs. time curve prescribed in ASTM E 119. Loading tests were then conducted on the beams that were not completely damaged through fire testing, in order to examine their remaining strength after cooling. Experimental results showed that non-fibrous reinforced RPC beams suffer early spalling during the fire test, thus causing beam failure after 38 min of fire exposure. The addition of PPFs in a low volume percentage (0.25%) decreases spalling and delays beam failure until 115 min, whereas PPFs in high percentages (0.75% and 1.25%) completely prevent the spalling and beam collapse. Moreover, an increase in PPF content reduces the total deflection of a beam and improves the residual strength and ultimate strength of fire-failed beams subsequent to cooling. |
|---|