Comperative studies of reinforcement concrete beam design using BS 8110 and ACI 318
The application of reinforced concrete beam is a cheap and widely used in Malaysia. Therefore in order to cope with concrete development, a study has been carrying out. This study is basically to discover designs with economical purposes by using BS 8110 and ACI 318. In obtaining results, the val...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Undergraduates Project Papers |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2010
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/2420/1/AHMAD_ADLI_BIN_JAMALUDIN.PDF http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/2420/ |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.ump.umpir.2420 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.ump.umpir.24202015-03-03T07:56:29Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/2420/ Comperative studies of reinforcement concrete beam design using BS 8110 and ACI 318 Ahmad Adli, Jamaludin TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) The application of reinforced concrete beam is a cheap and widely used in Malaysia. Therefore in order to cope with concrete development, a study has been carrying out. This study is basically to discover designs with economical purposes by using BS 8110 and ACI 318. In obtaining results, the value of moment and shear are set as constant. The scope of this study is on four various sizes of rectangular beams which are the beam size (500 mm x 450 mm, 600 mm x 350 mm, 650 mm x 500 mm, 700 mm x 400 mm). Microsoft Office Excel is used in this study in making the calculation easier and accurate. Microsoft Office Excel acts as a medium in obtaining results and there are also manual calculation being done to rake sure that the calculation using' Microsoft Office Excel is similar with the manuals. From analysis and result, it show that in order to get the area of reinforcement, ACT 318 is more economical while in spacing and link size, ACT 318 shows that it is more economical in term of number of link in used. From this findings, it shows that certain codes has it owns advantage and designer has options on it because all of these codes are still the same in terms of safety. 2010-11 Undergraduates Project Papers NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/2420/1/AHMAD_ADLI_BIN_JAMALUDIN.PDF Ahmad Adli, Jamaludin (2010) Comperative studies of reinforcement concrete beam design using BS 8110 and ACI 318. Faculty of Civil Engineering & Earth Resources, Universiti Malaysia Pahang. |
institution |
Universiti Malaysia Pahang |
building |
UMP Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Malaysia Pahang |
content_source |
UMP Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/ |
language |
English |
topic |
TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) |
spellingShingle |
TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) Ahmad Adli, Jamaludin Comperative studies of reinforcement concrete beam design using BS 8110 and ACI 318 |
description |
The application of reinforced concrete beam is a cheap and widely used in Malaysia.
Therefore in order to cope with concrete development, a study has been carrying out. This
study is basically to discover designs with economical purposes by using BS 8110 and
ACI 318. In obtaining results, the value of moment and shear are set as constant. The scope
of this study is on four various sizes of rectangular beams which are the beam size (500
mm x 450 mm, 600 mm x 350 mm, 650 mm x 500 mm, 700 mm x 400 mm).
Microsoft Office Excel is used in this study in making the calculation easier and accurate.
Microsoft Office Excel acts as a medium in obtaining results and there are also manual
calculation being done to rake sure that the calculation using' Microsoft Office Excel is
similar with the manuals. From analysis and result, it show that in order to get the area of
reinforcement, ACT 318 is more economical while in spacing and link size, ACT 318 shows
that it is more economical in term of number of link in used. From this findings, it shows
that certain codes has it owns advantage and designer has options on it because all of these
codes are still the same in terms of safety. |
format |
Undergraduates Project Papers |
author |
Ahmad Adli, Jamaludin |
author_facet |
Ahmad Adli, Jamaludin |
author_sort |
Ahmad Adli, Jamaludin |
title |
Comperative studies of reinforcement concrete beam design using BS 8110 and ACI 318 |
title_short |
Comperative studies of reinforcement concrete beam design using BS 8110 and ACI 318 |
title_full |
Comperative studies of reinforcement concrete beam design using BS 8110 and ACI 318 |
title_fullStr |
Comperative studies of reinforcement concrete beam design using BS 8110 and ACI 318 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comperative studies of reinforcement concrete beam design using BS 8110 and ACI 318 |
title_sort |
comperative studies of reinforcement concrete beam design using bs 8110 and aci 318 |
publishDate |
2010 |
url |
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/2420/1/AHMAD_ADLI_BIN_JAMALUDIN.PDF http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/2420/ |
_version_ |
1643664611543613440 |
score |
13.209306 |