Microfinance: A Review On institutionalist And Welfarist approach

This paper is a comparison of two opposite schools of thoughts on Microfinance viz., Institutionalist viewpoint and Welfarist viewpoint. The Institutionalist approach claims that without financial self-sufficiency, it is not possible for microfinance institutions to sustain their operations by relyi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammad, Aslam, T., Senthil Kumar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The International Journal Research Publication's 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/23618/1/7484-18240-1-PB.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/23618/
https://www.theinternationaljournal.org/ojs/index.php?journal=tij&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=7484
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.ump.umpir.23618
record_format eprints
spelling my.ump.umpir.236182019-01-09T02:10:52Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/23618/ Microfinance: A Review On institutionalist And Welfarist approach Mohammad, Aslam T., Senthil Kumar HG Finance This paper is a comparison of two opposite schools of thoughts on Microfinance viz., Institutionalist viewpoint and Welfarist viewpoint. The Institutionalist approach claims that without financial self-sufficiency, it is not possible for microfinance institutions to sustain their operations by relying mainly on government and donor aids. The Welfarist approach propounds that the ultimate goal is to reach maximum number of poor beneficiaries for their wellbeing irrespective of who bears the cost for this service. There has been a mix reactions in several studies in different time period and different parts of the world with different methodology with respect to profitability and outreach of microfinance institutions. Some literature say that outreach and profitability can be achieved together, some say they are negatively correlated where there is a need for balancing between them. Therefore, the net consolidation between institutionalist and welfarist stands for ambiguous position. Microfinance must be extended as a social and economic obligation of the fund provider to eliminate, or at least reduce poverty, to ensure a just and equitable society. Yet, it is essential that microfinance institutions serve the poverty and also attain self-sufficiency concurrently. The International Journal Research Publication's 2018-12 Article PeerReviewed pdf en cc_by http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/23618/1/7484-18240-1-PB.pdf Mohammad, Aslam and T., Senthil Kumar (2018) Microfinance: A Review On institutionalist And Welfarist approach. Research Journal of Social Science & Management, 8 (8). pp. 25-31. ISSN 2251-1571 https://www.theinternationaljournal.org/ojs/index.php?journal=tij&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=7484
institution Universiti Malaysia Pahang
building UMP Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Pahang
content_source UMP Institutional Repository
url_provider http://umpir.ump.edu.my/
language English
topic HG Finance
spellingShingle HG Finance
Mohammad, Aslam
T., Senthil Kumar
Microfinance: A Review On institutionalist And Welfarist approach
description This paper is a comparison of two opposite schools of thoughts on Microfinance viz., Institutionalist viewpoint and Welfarist viewpoint. The Institutionalist approach claims that without financial self-sufficiency, it is not possible for microfinance institutions to sustain their operations by relying mainly on government and donor aids. The Welfarist approach propounds that the ultimate goal is to reach maximum number of poor beneficiaries for their wellbeing irrespective of who bears the cost for this service. There has been a mix reactions in several studies in different time period and different parts of the world with different methodology with respect to profitability and outreach of microfinance institutions. Some literature say that outreach and profitability can be achieved together, some say they are negatively correlated where there is a need for balancing between them. Therefore, the net consolidation between institutionalist and welfarist stands for ambiguous position. Microfinance must be extended as a social and economic obligation of the fund provider to eliminate, or at least reduce poverty, to ensure a just and equitable society. Yet, it is essential that microfinance institutions serve the poverty and also attain self-sufficiency concurrently.
format Article
author Mohammad, Aslam
T., Senthil Kumar
author_facet Mohammad, Aslam
T., Senthil Kumar
author_sort Mohammad, Aslam
title Microfinance: A Review On institutionalist And Welfarist approach
title_short Microfinance: A Review On institutionalist And Welfarist approach
title_full Microfinance: A Review On institutionalist And Welfarist approach
title_fullStr Microfinance: A Review On institutionalist And Welfarist approach
title_full_unstemmed Microfinance: A Review On institutionalist And Welfarist approach
title_sort microfinance: a review on institutionalist and welfarist approach
publisher The International Journal Research Publication's
publishDate 2018
url http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/23618/1/7484-18240-1-PB.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/23618/
https://www.theinternationaljournal.org/ojs/index.php?journal=tij&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=7484
_version_ 1643669647103361024
score 13.154949