Investigation of Aluminum-Stainless Steel Dissimilar Weld Quality using Different Filler Metals

Aluminum-stainless steel dissimilar welding processes yield unwanted disadvantages in the weld joint due to the large difference between the aluminum-stainless steel sheets’ melting points and the nearly zero solid solubility between these two metals. Aluminum AA6061 and stainless steel SUS304 we...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: L. H., Shah, A. R., Razali, M., Ishak
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universiti Malaysia Pahang 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/10982/1/3_Shah%20et%20al.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/10982/
http://dx.doi.org/10.15282/ijame.8.2013.3.0091
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.ump.umpir.10982
record_format eprints
spelling my.ump.umpir.109822018-01-10T03:04:43Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/10982/ Investigation of Aluminum-Stainless Steel Dissimilar Weld Quality using Different Filler Metals L. H., Shah A. R., Razali M., Ishak TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery Aluminum-stainless steel dissimilar welding processes yield unwanted disadvantages in the weld joint due to the large difference between the aluminum-stainless steel sheets’ melting points and the nearly zero solid solubility between these two metals. Aluminum AA6061 and stainless steel SUS304 were lap-welded by using Metal Inert Gas (MIG) welding with aluminum filler ER5356 (Group 1) and stainless steel filler ER308LSi (Group 2). The effects of the welding voltage and type of filler metals used on the weld joints were studied. The welding voltage had a significant effect on the welding process, as higher voltage resulted in poorer appearance of the weld joint and led to defects for both groups, such as porosity and incomplete fusion. The microstructure for Group 1 joints shows enrichment of Si particles, which benefited the joint properties as it increased the strength of the metal. The stainless steel substrates that spread into the aluminum side are much greater in volume for Group 1 than for Group 2 joints. Meanwhile, the microstructure of Group 2 joints (using ER308LSi filler) consists of chromium carbide precipitation which yields a high hardness value, but a brittle structure. The hardness values of the welded seams in Group 1 and Group 2 range from 60 to 100 HV and 160 to 230 HV, respectively. The fracture in the tensile test yielded the highest tensile strength of 104.4 MPa with aluminum fillers. The tensile strength of Group 1 joints ranging from 47.8 to 104.4 MPa was collectively higher than Group 2 joints, between 20.24 to 61.76 MPa. Based on the investigation throughout this study, it can be concluded that the welding voltage of 18 V and aluminum filler ER5356 is the optimum filler in joining the dissimilar metals aluminum AA6061 and stainless steel SUS 304. Universiti Malaysia Pahang 2013 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en cc_by http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/10982/1/3_Shah%20et%20al.pdf L. H., Shah and A. R., Razali and M., Ishak (2013) Investigation of Aluminum-Stainless Steel Dissimilar Weld Quality using Different Filler Metals. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering (IJAME), 8. pp. 1121-1131. ISSN 1985-9325(Print); 2180-1606 (Online) http://dx.doi.org/10.15282/ijame.8.2013.3.0091 DOI: 10.15282/ijame.8.2013.3.0091
institution Universiti Malaysia Pahang
building UMP Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Pahang
content_source UMP Institutional Repository
url_provider http://umpir.ump.edu.my/
language English
topic TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
spellingShingle TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
L. H., Shah
A. R., Razali
M., Ishak
Investigation of Aluminum-Stainless Steel Dissimilar Weld Quality using Different Filler Metals
description Aluminum-stainless steel dissimilar welding processes yield unwanted disadvantages in the weld joint due to the large difference between the aluminum-stainless steel sheets’ melting points and the nearly zero solid solubility between these two metals. Aluminum AA6061 and stainless steel SUS304 were lap-welded by using Metal Inert Gas (MIG) welding with aluminum filler ER5356 (Group 1) and stainless steel filler ER308LSi (Group 2). The effects of the welding voltage and type of filler metals used on the weld joints were studied. The welding voltage had a significant effect on the welding process, as higher voltage resulted in poorer appearance of the weld joint and led to defects for both groups, such as porosity and incomplete fusion. The microstructure for Group 1 joints shows enrichment of Si particles, which benefited the joint properties as it increased the strength of the metal. The stainless steel substrates that spread into the aluminum side are much greater in volume for Group 1 than for Group 2 joints. Meanwhile, the microstructure of Group 2 joints (using ER308LSi filler) consists of chromium carbide precipitation which yields a high hardness value, but a brittle structure. The hardness values of the welded seams in Group 1 and Group 2 range from 60 to 100 HV and 160 to 230 HV, respectively. The fracture in the tensile test yielded the highest tensile strength of 104.4 MPa with aluminum fillers. The tensile strength of Group 1 joints ranging from 47.8 to 104.4 MPa was collectively higher than Group 2 joints, between 20.24 to 61.76 MPa. Based on the investigation throughout this study, it can be concluded that the welding voltage of 18 V and aluminum filler ER5356 is the optimum filler in joining the dissimilar metals aluminum AA6061 and stainless steel SUS 304.
format Article
author L. H., Shah
A. R., Razali
M., Ishak
author_facet L. H., Shah
A. R., Razali
M., Ishak
author_sort L. H., Shah
title Investigation of Aluminum-Stainless Steel Dissimilar Weld Quality using Different Filler Metals
title_short Investigation of Aluminum-Stainless Steel Dissimilar Weld Quality using Different Filler Metals
title_full Investigation of Aluminum-Stainless Steel Dissimilar Weld Quality using Different Filler Metals
title_fullStr Investigation of Aluminum-Stainless Steel Dissimilar Weld Quality using Different Filler Metals
title_full_unstemmed Investigation of Aluminum-Stainless Steel Dissimilar Weld Quality using Different Filler Metals
title_sort investigation of aluminum-stainless steel dissimilar weld quality using different filler metals
publisher Universiti Malaysia Pahang
publishDate 2013
url http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/10982/1/3_Shah%20et%20al.pdf
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/10982/
http://dx.doi.org/10.15282/ijame.8.2013.3.0091
_version_ 1643666544861904896
score 13.209306