Overcoming barriers to inclusive mobility: Experience of disabled people in Tertiary Institutions of Kano, Nigeria / Ahmed Abubakar
For persons with disabilities Mobility is an essential part of their inclusive participation. Yet, the environment still presents one of the unresolved problems of mobility restrictions. This qualitative research explores the mobility experience of staff and students with disabilities to examine...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Thesis |
Published: |
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/9939/1/Abubakar_Ahmed.pdf http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/9939/2/Ahmed_Abubakar_%E2%80%93_Thesis.pdf http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/9939/ |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | For persons with disabilities Mobility is an essential part of their inclusive
participation. Yet, the environment still presents one of the unresolved problems of
mobility restrictions. This qualitative research explores the mobility experience of staff
and students with disabilities to examine why and how disablement is experienced and
negotiated in and within educational setting amidst inclusive policies. The aim is to
establish a model for overcoming the barriers to the inclusion of disabled people in
tertiary institutions in Nigeria, to inform on decision-making in the practice and policy.
Data comprise 19 semi-structured interviews with participants from and across two
tertiary institutions offering special education at the departmental level in Kano State
Nigeria. The multiple embedded approaches reinforced the interview findings from the
case study participants. Physical observations in the form of physical accessibility audit
checklist (PAAC) and document review are employed as a source of multiple evidences.
Data analysed using an interpretative phenomenological approach are within the
framework of the social-ecological model to decode the mobility experience using
NVivo (version 10). Mobility experience of persons with disabilities emerged, complex
and diverse. For interpretation, the experiences of hearing, visually and walking
impaired emerged in four levels of influences: Individual, social, physical and policy.
Free nodes identified are barriers to disabled peoples’ mobility, barrier impact, and
ways to overcome and negotiate the barrier subjectivities. The barriers emerged under
psychological, attitudinal, physical and logistical influences. While some barriers are
impairment related, there exist impairment and campus specific. From case study site-1,
physical barriers are expressed more by the walking impaired, followed by attitudinal,
than logistical. In the case study site-2, however, attitudinal barriers frequently emerged
from the visually impaired followed by physical barriers. Cross-case analysis revealed
the replication logic between intragroup similarities and differences with variations based on degree rather than kind. Overall, the prominently expressed barrier with the
greatest impact on disabled people is physical, followed by the attitudinal, while the
psychological barrier is the least of their mobility problems. The impact of the barriers
on the individual includes loss of confidence, and demotivation, financial burden,
physical stress and time constraints. Overcoming barrier subjectivities involve a
resilience-based approach and coping strategy through time management and selfmotivation
at the individual level. Improving awareness and support, barrier removal
and policy improvement and implementation help in overcoming the barrier at the
social, physical and policy level respectively. Often, the individuals manage the
psychological barriers, but socio-attitudinal at the social level, and socio-spatial barriers
at the physical level, as well as a lack of support, communication and policy
implementation, becomes impediments to mobility in the form of logistical barriers and
they are the hardest to manage by disabled people. The model for overcoming barriers
to the inclusion of persons with disabilities in tertiary institutions in Nigeria, have the
potential of mitigating problems associated with inequality and disability. These extend
at various levels of environmental influence, especially in developing countries and
widening participation in the global drive to achieve “education for all”.
|
---|