Corporate governance: Golden parachute for minority shareholders / Ng Boon Siong
As rightly put by Sealy (1996), the law has to strike a delicate balance in cases of tussles between the majority and minority shareholders. Although the legal and regulatory apparatus in Malaysia have shown great alacrity in the recent years endeavouring to rewrite the corporate rules and revamp...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Thesis |
Published: |
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/6855/1/Master_Dissertation%2DCorporate_Governance%2DGolden_Parachute_for_Minority_Shareholders.pdf http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/6855/ |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | As rightly put by Sealy (1996), the law has to strike a delicate balance in cases of
tussles between the majority and minority shareholders. Although the legal and
regulatory apparatus in Malaysia have shown great alacrity in the recent years
endeavouring to rewrite the corporate rules and revamp its legal landscape, it remains
nigh impossible to legally define a thin crystal clear demarcation line between the
protection afforded to the minority shareholders and the consideration of the corporate
interest as a whole. Such thorny situations may arise when the court is faced with the
dilemma of giving overwhelmed support to the majority at the expense of prejudicing
the minority where the court is prepared to condone unfair acts and decisions of the
majority. Conversely, the day-today operation of the company may be hindered if the
court tends to favour the exasperating demands and objections of the dissatisfying
minorities. This predicament inevitably devolves an onerous task of striking a balance
upon the court in leaving the internal management to the company whilst ensuring that
the interest of the minorities is not imperilled. Hence, it is high time for the best
practices of corporate governance to step in and act as the golden scale to complement
the imperfection of law in balancing the rights of the majority and the minority
shareholders with the holistic view of enhancing shareholder values. As an alternative
remedy, the protective measure of corporate governance may well hold the answer to
the din of corporate malpractices. This study has an international magnitude but with a
focus on Malaysian public-listed corporations which involve the public investors at
large. The methodology of this study aims at providing positive descriptive analysis of
the corporate governance best practices for the purpose of minority shareholders’
activism and protection. The methodology adopted was mainly premised on a
qualitative approach via massive literature review and identification of governance
mechanisms that focus on the best practices of corporate governance. This study delved
into the issues of corporate governance based on content analysis with specific reference
to case studies and reports in order to derive a set of best practices of corporate
governance for the protection of the minority shareholders. The findings of this research
will have significant implications for improving the overall corporate governance
practices in Malaysia in that they highlight the protection of the minority shareholders
in the corporate governance regime. Unlike most studies on corporate governance issues
in Malaysia and East Asian countries which are based on strong quantitative
methodological focus and being scattered in numerous disciplines, this research aims to
provide a more in-depth legal insights and understanding of corporate governance
practices, using qualitative and analytical study based approach. Ultimately, the golden
parachute of corporate governance best practices will land the minority shareholders on
gold mine of corporate prosperity in order to achieve a higher standard of Malaysian
corporate governance. The main objective of this dissertation lies in the formulation of
corporate governance best practices for the protection of the minority shareholders. |
---|