Descartes and Popper on the foundations of knowledge / Mohd Khairul Anam Che Mentri
This study attempts to examine the philosophical experiments of Descartes and of Popper in dealing with the problem of the foundations of knowledge. It analyses and presents their instruments and tools, concepts and methods of thinking that they have developed in their struggle to provide answers...
Saved in:
Summary: | This study attempts to examine the philosophical experiments of Descartes and of
Popper in dealing with the problem of the foundations of knowledge. It analyses and
presents their instruments and tools, concepts and methods of thinking that they have
developed in their struggle to provide answers to such problems. Apart from presenting
those experiments separately, this study also narrates in comparative manner the
differences and similarities that can be found in their epistemological principles and
methods. Conceptually, I divide the study into three major themes. The first theme deals
with the historical dimension. In order to throw light on the philosophical ideas of
Descartes and Popper, I reconstruct the context in which those ideas emerge by relating
them to certain significant episodes in their lives. The presentation of this historical
study can be found in Chapter 2 on Descartes, and in Chapter 4 on Popper. Without
critical comment, but more as a philosophical exposition, the second theme explains and
examines the philosophical thought of Descartes and Popper in dealing with the
problem of knowledge and its foundations—of which can be found in Chapter 3 on
Descartes’, and in Chapter 5 on Popper’s. In the course of this exposition, I endeavour
to provide a systematic reconstruction of their epistemological systems and their
specific views on the foundations of knowledge, and in certain places suggest some new
interpretations. The last theme deals, in a comparative manner, with some fundamental
differences and striking similarities in their epistemological principles and methods.
The main conclusion which I reach is that there exist similar approaches, but with
different instruments or conceptions or methods and ultimately they bring forth
strikingly different results. |
---|