Misconceptions on chemical bonding among form four pupils / Quah Mei Ling
The learning of chemical bonding in chemistry is an abstract concept for all students. The process of learning chemistry can be classified into three levels which are macroscopic, sub-microscopic, and symbolic levels. Students have problems correlating all three levels in learning chemical bondin...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Thesis |
Published: |
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/15124/2/Quah_Mei_Ling.pdf http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/15124/1/Quah_Mei_Ling.pdf http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/15124/ |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The learning of chemical bonding in chemistry is an abstract concept for all students.
The process of learning chemistry can be classified into three levels which are
macroscopic, sub-microscopic, and symbolic levels. Students have problems
correlating all three levels in learning chemical bonding. During the transition of these
three levels, students face difficulties in relating the macroscopic and sub-microscopic
levels which lead to misconceptions. Therefore, the purpose of conducting this study
was to explore the misconceptions of chemical bonding which includes ionic bonding
and covalent bonding among Form Four students. This study aimed to answer two
research questions; 1) what are the misconceptions (if any) of chemical bonding among
Form Four students and 2) how is the misconceptions on chemical bonding among
Form Four students. A mixed-method design was applied to this research. The type
of mixed method design starting with quantitative method and followed by qualitative
method. In the first phase, which was the quantitative method, the participants were
selected by convenient sampling where a total of 36 participants were selected. All the
participants selected were given a two-tier diagnostic test to answer within 20 minutes.
The data collected was analyzed descriptively to answer research question one. The
second phase was the qualitative method, where 7 students were selected based on
their diagnostic test scores to be interviewed in-depth on their misconceptions. These
students were purposively selected for having the lowest scores. The findings showed
that students have conceptual misunderstanding and factual misconception on
chemical bonding and these misconceptions are students unable to differentiate ionic
and covalent bonding, students failed to identify the type of particles in ionic and
covalent bonding and students unable to construct the structure for ionic bonding. Lastly, students failed to apply proton number and valency of electron of an element
which needed for students to interpret the chemical bonding.
|
---|