Comparative simulation study of gas-phase propylene polymerization in fluidized bed reactors using aspen polymers and two phase models

A comparative study describing gas-phase propylene polymerization in fluidized-bed reactors using Ziegler-Natta catalyst is presented. The reactor behavior was explained using a two-phase model (which is based on principles of fluidization) as well as simulation using the Aspen Polymers process simu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmad, S., M.A., H., Sabri, M.F., Navid, M.
Format: Article
Published: Chemical Industry and Chemical Engineering Quarterly 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/6981/
http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/Article.aspx?id=1451-93721200038S
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.um.eprints.6981
record_format eprints
spelling my.um.eprints.69812013-07-10T00:47:36Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/6981/ Comparative simulation study of gas-phase propylene polymerization in fluidized bed reactors using aspen polymers and two phase models Ahmad, S. M.A., H. Sabri, M.F. Navid, M. TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TP Chemical technology A comparative study describing gas-phase propylene polymerization in fluidized-bed reactors using Ziegler-Natta catalyst is presented. The reactor behavior was explained using a two-phase model (which is based on principles of fluidization) as well as simulation using the Aspen Polymers process simulator. The two-phase reactor model accounts for the emulsion and bubble phases which contain different portions of catalysts with the polymerization occurring in both phases. Both models predict production rate, molecular weight, polydispersity index (PDI) and melt flow index (MFI) of the polymer. We used both models to investigate the effect of important polymerization parameters, namely catalyst feed rate and hydrogen concentration, on the product polypropylene properties, such as production rate, molecular weight, PDI and MFI. Both the two-phase model and Aspen Polymers simulator showed good agreement in terms of production rate. However, the models differed in their predictions for weight-average molecular weight, PDI and MFI. Based on these results, we propose incorporating the missing hydrodynamic effects into Aspen Polymers to provide a more realistic understanding of the phenomena encountered in fluidized bed reactors for polyolefin production. Chemical Industry and Chemical Engineering Quarterly 2012 Article PeerReviewed Ahmad, S. and M.A., H. and Sabri, M.F. and Navid, M. (2012) Comparative simulation study of gas-phase propylene polymerization in fluidized bed reactors using aspen polymers and two phase models. Chemical Industry and Chemical Engineering Quarterly (00). p. 38. ISSN 1451-9372 http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/Article.aspx?id=1451-93721200038S 10.2298/CICEQ111214038S
institution Universiti Malaya
building UM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaya
content_source UM Research Repository
url_provider http://eprints.um.edu.my/
topic TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TP Chemical technology
spellingShingle TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TP Chemical technology
Ahmad, S.
M.A., H.
Sabri, M.F.
Navid, M.
Comparative simulation study of gas-phase propylene polymerization in fluidized bed reactors using aspen polymers and two phase models
description A comparative study describing gas-phase propylene polymerization in fluidized-bed reactors using Ziegler-Natta catalyst is presented. The reactor behavior was explained using a two-phase model (which is based on principles of fluidization) as well as simulation using the Aspen Polymers process simulator. The two-phase reactor model accounts for the emulsion and bubble phases which contain different portions of catalysts with the polymerization occurring in both phases. Both models predict production rate, molecular weight, polydispersity index (PDI) and melt flow index (MFI) of the polymer. We used both models to investigate the effect of important polymerization parameters, namely catalyst feed rate and hydrogen concentration, on the product polypropylene properties, such as production rate, molecular weight, PDI and MFI. Both the two-phase model and Aspen Polymers simulator showed good agreement in terms of production rate. However, the models differed in their predictions for weight-average molecular weight, PDI and MFI. Based on these results, we propose incorporating the missing hydrodynamic effects into Aspen Polymers to provide a more realistic understanding of the phenomena encountered in fluidized bed reactors for polyolefin production.
format Article
author Ahmad, S.
M.A., H.
Sabri, M.F.
Navid, M.
author_facet Ahmad, S.
M.A., H.
Sabri, M.F.
Navid, M.
author_sort Ahmad, S.
title Comparative simulation study of gas-phase propylene polymerization in fluidized bed reactors using aspen polymers and two phase models
title_short Comparative simulation study of gas-phase propylene polymerization in fluidized bed reactors using aspen polymers and two phase models
title_full Comparative simulation study of gas-phase propylene polymerization in fluidized bed reactors using aspen polymers and two phase models
title_fullStr Comparative simulation study of gas-phase propylene polymerization in fluidized bed reactors using aspen polymers and two phase models
title_full_unstemmed Comparative simulation study of gas-phase propylene polymerization in fluidized bed reactors using aspen polymers and two phase models
title_sort comparative simulation study of gas-phase propylene polymerization in fluidized bed reactors using aspen polymers and two phase models
publisher Chemical Industry and Chemical Engineering Quarterly
publishDate 2012
url http://eprints.um.edu.my/6981/
http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/Article.aspx?id=1451-93721200038S
_version_ 1643687932575350784
score 13.18916