Tribological behaviour of quenched and tempered, and austempered ductile iron at the same hardness level

The tribological behaviour of ductile iron heat-treated by two different procedures viz. quenching and tempering, and austempering to an identical matrix hardness of 445 KHN is compared. Wear tests were carried out using a pin-on-disc type apparatus under dry sliding conditions at a linear speed of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Haseeb, A.S. Md. Abdul, Islam, Md. Aminul, Bepari, Md. Mohar Ali
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier 2000
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/5785/
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1648(00)00404-X
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.um.eprints.5785
record_format eprints
spelling my.um.eprints.57852018-10-16T04:35:18Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/5785/ Tribological behaviour of quenched and tempered, and austempered ductile iron at the same hardness level Haseeb, A.S. Md. Abdul Islam, Md. Aminul Bepari, Md. Mohar Ali TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery The tribological behaviour of ductile iron heat-treated by two different procedures viz. quenching and tempering, and austempering to an identical matrix hardness of 445 KHN is compared. Wear tests were carried out using a pin-on-disc type apparatus under dry sliding conditions at a linear speed of 1.18 m s(-1). Applied load and sliding distance in the range of 7.5-30 N and 2 x 10(4)-6 x 10(4) m, respectively, were used. It was observed that under all test conditions, austempered ductile iron exhibits a better wear resistance than quenched and tempered ductile iron, although both have an identical chemical composition and matrix hardness. The relative superiority of austempered ductile iron becomes even more pronounced at higher load and longer sliding distance. Microhardness measurement below the wear scar reveals that the hardness of austempered ductile iron increases while that of quenched and tempered iron decreases during the wear process. Metallographic study of the worn surfaces and X-ray investigation on wear debris indicate that oxidational wear is operative in both the samples. Stress-induced martensitic transformation of retained austenite as well as strain hardening of bainitic ferrite are thought to contribute to the improved wear performance of austempered ductile iron. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science S.A. All rights reserved. Elsevier 2000 Article PeerReviewed Haseeb, A.S. Md. Abdul and Islam, Md. Aminul and Bepari, Md. Mohar Ali (2000) Tribological behaviour of quenched and tempered, and austempered ductile iron at the same hardness level. Wear, 244 (1-2). pp. 15-19. ISSN 0043-1648 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1648(00)00404-X doi:10.1016/S0043-1648(00)00404-X
institution Universiti Malaya
building UM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaya
content_source UM Research Repository
url_provider http://eprints.um.edu.my/
topic TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
spellingShingle TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
Haseeb, A.S. Md. Abdul
Islam, Md. Aminul
Bepari, Md. Mohar Ali
Tribological behaviour of quenched and tempered, and austempered ductile iron at the same hardness level
description The tribological behaviour of ductile iron heat-treated by two different procedures viz. quenching and tempering, and austempering to an identical matrix hardness of 445 KHN is compared. Wear tests were carried out using a pin-on-disc type apparatus under dry sliding conditions at a linear speed of 1.18 m s(-1). Applied load and sliding distance in the range of 7.5-30 N and 2 x 10(4)-6 x 10(4) m, respectively, were used. It was observed that under all test conditions, austempered ductile iron exhibits a better wear resistance than quenched and tempered ductile iron, although both have an identical chemical composition and matrix hardness. The relative superiority of austempered ductile iron becomes even more pronounced at higher load and longer sliding distance. Microhardness measurement below the wear scar reveals that the hardness of austempered ductile iron increases while that of quenched and tempered iron decreases during the wear process. Metallographic study of the worn surfaces and X-ray investigation on wear debris indicate that oxidational wear is operative in both the samples. Stress-induced martensitic transformation of retained austenite as well as strain hardening of bainitic ferrite are thought to contribute to the improved wear performance of austempered ductile iron. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science S.A. All rights reserved.
format Article
author Haseeb, A.S. Md. Abdul
Islam, Md. Aminul
Bepari, Md. Mohar Ali
author_facet Haseeb, A.S. Md. Abdul
Islam, Md. Aminul
Bepari, Md. Mohar Ali
author_sort Haseeb, A.S. Md. Abdul
title Tribological behaviour of quenched and tempered, and austempered ductile iron at the same hardness level
title_short Tribological behaviour of quenched and tempered, and austempered ductile iron at the same hardness level
title_full Tribological behaviour of quenched and tempered, and austempered ductile iron at the same hardness level
title_fullStr Tribological behaviour of quenched and tempered, and austempered ductile iron at the same hardness level
title_full_unstemmed Tribological behaviour of quenched and tempered, and austempered ductile iron at the same hardness level
title_sort tribological behaviour of quenched and tempered, and austempered ductile iron at the same hardness level
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2000
url http://eprints.um.edu.my/5785/
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1648(00)00404-X
_version_ 1643687669791719424
score 13.160551