Life cycle assessment on recycled e-waste concrete

The electronic industry is a fast-growing trade. Its speedy development quickly leads to obsoleting the devices. The e-plastic, as the second major component in e-waste after metal components, is costly yet challenging to recycle due to the complexities of the plastic resin mixtures. Therefore, util...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Goh, Pei Gy, Maghfouri, Mehdi, Onn, Chiu Chuen, Loo, Siaw Chuing
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/41177/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.um.eprints.41177
record_format eprints
spelling my.um.eprints.411772023-09-12T04:39:07Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/41177/ Life cycle assessment on recycled e-waste concrete Goh, Pei Gy Maghfouri, Mehdi Onn, Chiu Chuen Loo, Siaw Chuing TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) The electronic industry is a fast-growing trade. Its speedy development quickly leads to obsoleting the devices. The e-plastic, as the second major component in e-waste after metal components, is costly yet challenging to recycle due to the complexities of the plastic resin mixtures. Therefore, utilising e-plastic to replace natural coarse aggregate in concrete material can reduce the envi-ronmental impact of landfilling the e-plastic and decrease the cost of concrete, making the con-crete eco-friendlier. This study aims to deploy a life cycle assessment (LCA) to determine the potential reduction in the environmental impact of e-plastic concrete compared among four scenarios with different types of binders, using SimaPro software. The four scenarios are built up from 1) conventional concrete, 2) concrete with 20 % coarse aggregate replaced by e-plastic, 3) 20 % e-plastic concrete with 30 % cement replaced by GGBS and 4) 20 % e-plastic concrete with 100 % cement replaced by GGBS and fly ash. From the global warming potential (GWP) perspective, using ReCiPe 2016 midpoint (H) analysis, all the e-plastic concrete shows a positive reduction of 1.26 %, 23.8 % and 21.43 % respectively compared to conventional concrete. However, the overall environmental impact shows a negative reduction, especially for scenario 3 and scenario 4. The presence of additives such as superplasticiser and alkaline solvent in the scenario 4 generates an environmental impact to the concrete from their manufacturing process. Therefore scenario 4 has a significant negative reduction in most of the indicators. Practically, e -plastic in concrete helps reduce the consumption of natural resources, lower the construction industry's environmental strain, and fix e-plastic deluged. Elsevier 2022-12 Article PeerReviewed Goh, Pei Gy and Maghfouri, Mehdi and Onn, Chiu Chuen and Loo, Siaw Chuing (2022) Life cycle assessment on recycled e-waste concrete. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 17. ISSN 2214-5095, DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01412 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01412>. 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01412
institution Universiti Malaya
building UM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaya
content_source UM Research Repository
url_provider http://eprints.um.edu.my/
topic TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
spellingShingle TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
Goh, Pei Gy
Maghfouri, Mehdi
Onn, Chiu Chuen
Loo, Siaw Chuing
Life cycle assessment on recycled e-waste concrete
description The electronic industry is a fast-growing trade. Its speedy development quickly leads to obsoleting the devices. The e-plastic, as the second major component in e-waste after metal components, is costly yet challenging to recycle due to the complexities of the plastic resin mixtures. Therefore, utilising e-plastic to replace natural coarse aggregate in concrete material can reduce the envi-ronmental impact of landfilling the e-plastic and decrease the cost of concrete, making the con-crete eco-friendlier. This study aims to deploy a life cycle assessment (LCA) to determine the potential reduction in the environmental impact of e-plastic concrete compared among four scenarios with different types of binders, using SimaPro software. The four scenarios are built up from 1) conventional concrete, 2) concrete with 20 % coarse aggregate replaced by e-plastic, 3) 20 % e-plastic concrete with 30 % cement replaced by GGBS and 4) 20 % e-plastic concrete with 100 % cement replaced by GGBS and fly ash. From the global warming potential (GWP) perspective, using ReCiPe 2016 midpoint (H) analysis, all the e-plastic concrete shows a positive reduction of 1.26 %, 23.8 % and 21.43 % respectively compared to conventional concrete. However, the overall environmental impact shows a negative reduction, especially for scenario 3 and scenario 4. The presence of additives such as superplasticiser and alkaline solvent in the scenario 4 generates an environmental impact to the concrete from their manufacturing process. Therefore scenario 4 has a significant negative reduction in most of the indicators. Practically, e -plastic in concrete helps reduce the consumption of natural resources, lower the construction industry's environmental strain, and fix e-plastic deluged.
format Article
author Goh, Pei Gy
Maghfouri, Mehdi
Onn, Chiu Chuen
Loo, Siaw Chuing
author_facet Goh, Pei Gy
Maghfouri, Mehdi
Onn, Chiu Chuen
Loo, Siaw Chuing
author_sort Goh, Pei Gy
title Life cycle assessment on recycled e-waste concrete
title_short Life cycle assessment on recycled e-waste concrete
title_full Life cycle assessment on recycled e-waste concrete
title_fullStr Life cycle assessment on recycled e-waste concrete
title_full_unstemmed Life cycle assessment on recycled e-waste concrete
title_sort life cycle assessment on recycled e-waste concrete
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2022
url http://eprints.um.edu.my/41177/
_version_ 1778161636688789504
score 13.211869