Effectiveness, safety, initial optimal dose, and optimal maintenance dose range of basal insulin regimens for type 2 diabetes: A systematic review with meta-analysis
AimsTo investigate the effectiveness, safety, optimal starting dose, optimal maintenance dose range, and target fasting plasma glucose of five basal insulins in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. MethodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched from J...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Published: |
Wiley
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eprints.um.edu.my/38300/ |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.um.eprints.38300 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.um.eprints.383002024-06-12T00:09:27Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/38300/ Effectiveness, safety, initial optimal dose, and optimal maintenance dose range of basal insulin regimens for type 2 diabetes: A systematic review with meta-analysis Luo, Yingying Xia, Jun Zhao, Zhan Chang, Yaping Bee, Yong Mong Nguyen, Khue Thy Lim, Soo Yabe, Daisuke McGill, Margaret Kong, Alice Pik Shan Chan, Siew Pheng Deodat, Marisa Deerochanawong, Chaicharn Suastika, Ketut Xu, Chenchen Chen, Liming Chen, Wei Li, Xiaoying Zhao, Weigang Yao, Xiaomei Ji, Linong RZ Other systems of medicine AimsTo investigate the effectiveness, safety, optimal starting dose, optimal maintenance dose range, and target fasting plasma glucose of five basal insulins in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. MethodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched from January 2000 to February 2022. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach was adopted. The registration ID is CRD42022319078 in PROSPERO. ResultsAmong 11 163 citations retrieved, 35 publications met the planned criteria. From meta-analyses and network meta-analyses, we found that when injecting basal insulin regimens at bedtime, the optimal choice in order of most to least effective might be glargine U-300 or degludec U-100, glargine U-100 or detemir, followed by neutral protamine hagedorn (NPH). Injecting glargine U-100 in the morning may be more effective (ie, more patients archiving glycated hemoglobin < 7.0%) and lead to fewer hypoglycemic events than injecting it at bedtime. The optimal starting dose for the initiation of any basal insulins can be 0.10-0.20 U/kg/day. There is no eligible evidence to investigate the optimal maintenance dose for basal insulins. ConclusionsThe five basal insulins are effective for the target population. Glargine U-300, degludec U-100, glargine U-100, and detemir lead to fewer hypoglycemic events than NPH without compromising glycemic control. Wiley 2023-05 Article PeerReviewed Luo, Yingying and Xia, Jun and Zhao, Zhan and Chang, Yaping and Bee, Yong Mong and Nguyen, Khue Thy and Lim, Soo and Yabe, Daisuke and McGill, Margaret and Kong, Alice Pik Shan and Chan, Siew Pheng and Deodat, Marisa and Deerochanawong, Chaicharn and Suastika, Ketut and Xu, Chenchen and Chen, Liming and Chen, Wei and Li, Xiaoying and Zhao, Weigang and Yao, Xiaomei and Ji, Linong (2023) Effectiveness, safety, initial optimal dose, and optimal maintenance dose range of basal insulin regimens for type 2 diabetes: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Journal of Diabetes, 15 (5). pp. 419-435. ISSN 1753-0393, DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-0407.13381 <https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-0407.13381>. 10.1111/1753-0407.13381 |
institution |
Universiti Malaya |
building |
UM Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Malaya |
content_source |
UM Research Repository |
url_provider |
http://eprints.um.edu.my/ |
topic |
RZ Other systems of medicine |
spellingShingle |
RZ Other systems of medicine Luo, Yingying Xia, Jun Zhao, Zhan Chang, Yaping Bee, Yong Mong Nguyen, Khue Thy Lim, Soo Yabe, Daisuke McGill, Margaret Kong, Alice Pik Shan Chan, Siew Pheng Deodat, Marisa Deerochanawong, Chaicharn Suastika, Ketut Xu, Chenchen Chen, Liming Chen, Wei Li, Xiaoying Zhao, Weigang Yao, Xiaomei Ji, Linong Effectiveness, safety, initial optimal dose, and optimal maintenance dose range of basal insulin regimens for type 2 diabetes: A systematic review with meta-analysis |
description |
AimsTo investigate the effectiveness, safety, optimal starting dose, optimal maintenance dose range, and target fasting plasma glucose of five basal insulins in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. MethodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched from January 2000 to February 2022. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach was adopted. The registration ID is CRD42022319078 in PROSPERO. ResultsAmong 11 163 citations retrieved, 35 publications met the planned criteria. From meta-analyses and network meta-analyses, we found that when injecting basal insulin regimens at bedtime, the optimal choice in order of most to least effective might be glargine U-300 or degludec U-100, glargine U-100 or detemir, followed by neutral protamine hagedorn (NPH). Injecting glargine U-100 in the morning may be more effective (ie, more patients archiving glycated hemoglobin < 7.0%) and lead to fewer hypoglycemic events than injecting it at bedtime. The optimal starting dose for the initiation of any basal insulins can be 0.10-0.20 U/kg/day. There is no eligible evidence to investigate the optimal maintenance dose for basal insulins. ConclusionsThe five basal insulins are effective for the target population. Glargine U-300, degludec U-100, glargine U-100, and detemir lead to fewer hypoglycemic events than NPH without compromising glycemic control. |
format |
Article |
author |
Luo, Yingying Xia, Jun Zhao, Zhan Chang, Yaping Bee, Yong Mong Nguyen, Khue Thy Lim, Soo Yabe, Daisuke McGill, Margaret Kong, Alice Pik Shan Chan, Siew Pheng Deodat, Marisa Deerochanawong, Chaicharn Suastika, Ketut Xu, Chenchen Chen, Liming Chen, Wei Li, Xiaoying Zhao, Weigang Yao, Xiaomei Ji, Linong |
author_facet |
Luo, Yingying Xia, Jun Zhao, Zhan Chang, Yaping Bee, Yong Mong Nguyen, Khue Thy Lim, Soo Yabe, Daisuke McGill, Margaret Kong, Alice Pik Shan Chan, Siew Pheng Deodat, Marisa Deerochanawong, Chaicharn Suastika, Ketut Xu, Chenchen Chen, Liming Chen, Wei Li, Xiaoying Zhao, Weigang Yao, Xiaomei Ji, Linong |
author_sort |
Luo, Yingying |
title |
Effectiveness, safety, initial optimal dose, and optimal maintenance dose range of basal insulin regimens for type 2 diabetes: A systematic review with meta-analysis |
title_short |
Effectiveness, safety, initial optimal dose, and optimal maintenance dose range of basal insulin regimens for type 2 diabetes: A systematic review with meta-analysis |
title_full |
Effectiveness, safety, initial optimal dose, and optimal maintenance dose range of basal insulin regimens for type 2 diabetes: A systematic review with meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
Effectiveness, safety, initial optimal dose, and optimal maintenance dose range of basal insulin regimens for type 2 diabetes: A systematic review with meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effectiveness, safety, initial optimal dose, and optimal maintenance dose range of basal insulin regimens for type 2 diabetes: A systematic review with meta-analysis |
title_sort |
effectiveness, safety, initial optimal dose, and optimal maintenance dose range of basal insulin regimens for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review with meta-analysis |
publisher |
Wiley |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
http://eprints.um.edu.my/38300/ |
_version_ |
1805881103936913408 |
score |
13.211869 |