A comparison of ramping position and sniffing position during endotracheal intubation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives: Positioning during endotracheal intubation (ETI) is critical to ensure its success. We aimed to determine if the ramping position improved laryngeal exposure and first attempt success at intubation when compared to the sniffing position. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL data...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tsan, Samuel Ern Hung, Ng, Ka Ting, Lau, Jiaying, Viknaswaran, Navian Lee, Wang, Chew Yin
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/37195/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.um.eprints.37195
record_format eprints
spelling my.um.eprints.371952023-05-20T03:47:19Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/37195/ A comparison of ramping position and sniffing position during endotracheal intubation: A systematic review and meta-analysis Tsan, Samuel Ern Hung Ng, Ka Ting Lau, Jiaying Viknaswaran, Navian Lee Wang, Chew Yin R Medicine (General) Objectives: Positioning during endotracheal intubation (ETI) is critical to ensure its success. We aimed to determine if the ramping position improved laryngeal exposure and first attempt success at intubation when compared to the sniffing position. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched systematically from inception until January 2020. Our primary outcomes included laryngeal exposure as measured by Cormack-Lehane Grade 1 or 2 (CLG 1/2), CLG 3 or 4 (CLG 3/4), and first attempt success at intubation. Secondary outcomes were intubation time, use of airway adjuncts, ancillary maneuvers and complications during ETI. Results: Seven studies met our inclusion criteria, of which 4 were RCTs and 3 were cohort studies. The meta-analysis was conducted by pooling the effect estimates for all 4 included RCTs (n = 632). There were no differences found between ramping and sniffing positions for odds of CLG 1/2, CLG 3/4, first attempt success at intubation, intubation time, use of ancillary airway maneuvers and use of airway adjuncts, with evidence of high heterogeneity across studies. However, the ramping position in surgical patients is associated with increased likelihood of CLG 1/2 (OR =2.05, 95% CI 1.26 to 3.32, p= 0.004) and lower likelihood of CLG 3/4 (OR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.79, p= 0.004), moderate quality of evidence. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis demonstrated that the ramping position may benefit surgical patients undergoing ETI by improving laryngeal exposure. Large-scale well-designed multicentre RCTs should be carried out to further elucidate the benefits of the ramping position in the surgical and intensive care unit patients. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. on behalf of Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Elsevier 2020 Article PeerReviewed Tsan, Samuel Ern Hung and Ng, Ka Ting and Lau, Jiaying and Viknaswaran, Navian Lee and Wang, Chew Yin (2020) A comparison of ramping position and sniffing position during endotracheal intubation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology, 70 (6). pp. 667-677. ISSN 0034-7094, DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjan.2020.08.009 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjan.2020.08.009>. (In Press) 10.1016/j.bjan.2020.08.009
institution Universiti Malaya
building UM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaya
content_source UM Research Repository
url_provider http://eprints.um.edu.my/
topic R Medicine (General)
spellingShingle R Medicine (General)
Tsan, Samuel Ern Hung
Ng, Ka Ting
Lau, Jiaying
Viknaswaran, Navian Lee
Wang, Chew Yin
A comparison of ramping position and sniffing position during endotracheal intubation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
description Objectives: Positioning during endotracheal intubation (ETI) is critical to ensure its success. We aimed to determine if the ramping position improved laryngeal exposure and first attempt success at intubation when compared to the sniffing position. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched systematically from inception until January 2020. Our primary outcomes included laryngeal exposure as measured by Cormack-Lehane Grade 1 or 2 (CLG 1/2), CLG 3 or 4 (CLG 3/4), and first attempt success at intubation. Secondary outcomes were intubation time, use of airway adjuncts, ancillary maneuvers and complications during ETI. Results: Seven studies met our inclusion criteria, of which 4 were RCTs and 3 were cohort studies. The meta-analysis was conducted by pooling the effect estimates for all 4 included RCTs (n = 632). There were no differences found between ramping and sniffing positions for odds of CLG 1/2, CLG 3/4, first attempt success at intubation, intubation time, use of ancillary airway maneuvers and use of airway adjuncts, with evidence of high heterogeneity across studies. However, the ramping position in surgical patients is associated with increased likelihood of CLG 1/2 (OR =2.05, 95% CI 1.26 to 3.32, p= 0.004) and lower likelihood of CLG 3/4 (OR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.79, p= 0.004), moderate quality of evidence. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis demonstrated that the ramping position may benefit surgical patients undergoing ETI by improving laryngeal exposure. Large-scale well-designed multicentre RCTs should be carried out to further elucidate the benefits of the ramping position in the surgical and intensive care unit patients. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. on behalf of Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia.
format Article
author Tsan, Samuel Ern Hung
Ng, Ka Ting
Lau, Jiaying
Viknaswaran, Navian Lee
Wang, Chew Yin
author_facet Tsan, Samuel Ern Hung
Ng, Ka Ting
Lau, Jiaying
Viknaswaran, Navian Lee
Wang, Chew Yin
author_sort Tsan, Samuel Ern Hung
title A comparison of ramping position and sniffing position during endotracheal intubation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short A comparison of ramping position and sniffing position during endotracheal intubation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full A comparison of ramping position and sniffing position during endotracheal intubation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr A comparison of ramping position and sniffing position during endotracheal intubation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of ramping position and sniffing position during endotracheal intubation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort comparison of ramping position and sniffing position during endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2020
url http://eprints.um.edu.my/37195/
_version_ 1768007313793220608
score 13.189132