Effects of pomegranate on lipid profiles: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials
Objective To present a systematic review of randomised controlled trials examining the effects of pomegranate (Arnica granatum) on lipid profiles. Method: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, SCOPUS and conference proceedings were searched for relevant trials...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Published: |
Churchill Livingstone
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eprints.um.edu.my/36989/ |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.um.eprints.36989 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.um.eprints.369892024-11-08T01:56:34Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/36989/ Effects of pomegranate on lipid profiles: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials Aziz, Zoriah Huin, Weng Kit Badrul Hisham, Muhammad Danish Ng, Jia Xin RM Therapeutics. Pharmacology Pharmacopoeia Objective To present a systematic review of randomised controlled trials examining the effects of pomegranate (Arnica granatum) on lipid profiles. Method: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, SCOPUS and conference proceedings were searched for relevant trials to June 2019. We included randomized controlled trials comparing pomegranate with placebo. The outcomes examined were effects on lipids level. Two authors screened titles for inclusion, extracted data and assessed the quality of the trials using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool. We used a random effects model to pool data and stratified trials to examine sources of statistical heterogeneity. To assess the quality of the evidence, we used the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Results: Seventeen trials recruiting 763 subjects met the inclusion criteria. These trials varied in terms of the dosage form of pomegranate used, subjects recruited and trials duration. Meta-analyses of data did not show pomegranate produced a significant effect on the lipids level examined. The quality of evidence for all outcomes was low due to the imprecision of the pooled effect and the inconsistency within the included trials. The limited data on safety suggest only mild, transient and infrequent adverse events with the short-term use of pomegranate. Conclusion: Current evidence does not show pomegranate has significant effects on serum lipid levels. The quality of evidence is poor to support the increasing use of pomegranate for hyperlipidaemia. Churchill Livingstone 2020-01 Article PeerReviewed Aziz, Zoriah and Huin, Weng Kit and Badrul Hisham, Muhammad Danish and Ng, Jia Xin (2020) Effects of pomegranate on lipid profiles: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 48. ISSN 0965-2299, DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2019.102236 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2019.102236>. 10.1016/j.ctim.2019.102236 |
institution |
Universiti Malaya |
building |
UM Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Malaya |
content_source |
UM Research Repository |
url_provider |
http://eprints.um.edu.my/ |
topic |
RM Therapeutics. Pharmacology Pharmacopoeia |
spellingShingle |
RM Therapeutics. Pharmacology Pharmacopoeia Aziz, Zoriah Huin, Weng Kit Badrul Hisham, Muhammad Danish Ng, Jia Xin Effects of pomegranate on lipid profiles: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials |
description |
Objective To present a systematic review of randomised controlled trials examining the effects of pomegranate (Arnica granatum) on lipid profiles. Method: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, SCOPUS and conference proceedings were searched for relevant trials to June 2019. We included randomized controlled trials comparing pomegranate with placebo. The outcomes examined were effects on lipids level. Two authors screened titles for inclusion, extracted data and assessed the quality of the trials using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool. We used a random effects model to pool data and stratified trials to examine sources of statistical heterogeneity. To assess the quality of the evidence, we used the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Results: Seventeen trials recruiting 763 subjects met the inclusion criteria. These trials varied in terms of the dosage form of pomegranate used, subjects recruited and trials duration. Meta-analyses of data did not show pomegranate produced a significant effect on the lipids level examined. The quality of evidence for all outcomes was low due to the imprecision of the pooled effect and the inconsistency within the included trials. The limited data on safety suggest only mild, transient and infrequent adverse events with the short-term use of pomegranate. Conclusion: Current evidence does not show pomegranate has significant effects on serum lipid levels. The quality of evidence is poor to support the increasing use of pomegranate for hyperlipidaemia. |
format |
Article |
author |
Aziz, Zoriah Huin, Weng Kit Badrul Hisham, Muhammad Danish Ng, Jia Xin |
author_facet |
Aziz, Zoriah Huin, Weng Kit Badrul Hisham, Muhammad Danish Ng, Jia Xin |
author_sort |
Aziz, Zoriah |
title |
Effects of pomegranate on lipid profiles: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials |
title_short |
Effects of pomegranate on lipid profiles: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials |
title_full |
Effects of pomegranate on lipid profiles: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials |
title_fullStr |
Effects of pomegranate on lipid profiles: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effects of pomegranate on lipid profiles: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials |
title_sort |
effects of pomegranate on lipid profiles: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials |
publisher |
Churchill Livingstone |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
http://eprints.um.edu.my/36989/ |
_version_ |
1816130391016210432 |
score |
13.214268 |