Enterprise risk management and risk culture in construction public listed companies

Inadequate risk management and lack of risk culture can expose a company to unexpected risk events, which can negatively affect its performance. However, there are inconsistencies in suitable dimensions to measure the enterprise risk management (ERM) construct, as well as insufficient embedding stra...

全面介紹

Saved in:
書目詳細資料
Main Authors: Ching, Wong Ching, Rahim, Faizul Azli Mohd, Low, Siaw Chuing
格式: Article
出版: Penerbit Univ Sains Malaysia 2021
主題:
在線閱讀:http://eprints.um.edu.my/35690/
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85122266572&doi=10.21315%2fjcdc2021.26.2.2&partnerID=40&md5=b1f23c55d9f2da611305f2e73ba07d8a
標簽: 添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
id my.um.eprints.35690
record_format eprints
spelling my.um.eprints.356902022-10-19T02:38:16Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/35690/ Enterprise risk management and risk culture in construction public listed companies Ching, Wong Ching Rahim, Faizul Azli Mohd Low, Siaw Chuing TH Building construction Inadequate risk management and lack of risk culture can expose a company to unexpected risk events, which can negatively affect its performance. However, there are inconsistencies in suitable dimensions to measure the enterprise risk management (ERM) construct, as well as insufficient embedding strategies for risk culture. This study aims to identify the ERM practices and risk culture dimensions among the Malaysian construction public listed companies (PLCs). The roles of top management and chief risk officer/risk manager in influencing ERM and risk culture are also explored. A total of 46 annual reports and 10 interviews of industry practitioners were analysed using content analysis. The analysis of the annual reports found that risk policy and risk appetite/tolerance, monitoring key risk and accountability are the three dimensions of risk culture. In addition, based on the interviews, reward and recognition and internal relationships were identified as the two dimensions of risk. Top management and risk manager were found to be the primary drivers of ERM programme and risk culture in construction PLCs. The results of this study are used to formulate a survey instrument for the subsequent data collection to test the proposed theoretical model. © Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, 2021. This work is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Penerbit Univ Sains Malaysia 2021 Article PeerReviewed Ching, Wong Ching and Rahim, Faizul Azli Mohd and Low, Siaw Chuing (2021) Enterprise risk management and risk culture in construction public listed companies. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 26 (2). pp. 17-36. ISSN 1823-6499, DOI https://doi.org/10.21315/jcdc2021.26.2.2 <https://doi.org/10.21315/jcdc2021.26.2.2>. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85122266572&doi=10.21315%2fjcdc2021.26.2.2&partnerID=40&md5=b1f23c55d9f2da611305f2e73ba07d8a 10.21315/jcdc2021.26.2.2
institution Universiti Malaya
building UM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaya
content_source UM Research Repository
url_provider http://eprints.um.edu.my/
topic TH Building construction
spellingShingle TH Building construction
Ching, Wong Ching
Rahim, Faizul Azli Mohd
Low, Siaw Chuing
Enterprise risk management and risk culture in construction public listed companies
description Inadequate risk management and lack of risk culture can expose a company to unexpected risk events, which can negatively affect its performance. However, there are inconsistencies in suitable dimensions to measure the enterprise risk management (ERM) construct, as well as insufficient embedding strategies for risk culture. This study aims to identify the ERM practices and risk culture dimensions among the Malaysian construction public listed companies (PLCs). The roles of top management and chief risk officer/risk manager in influencing ERM and risk culture are also explored. A total of 46 annual reports and 10 interviews of industry practitioners were analysed using content analysis. The analysis of the annual reports found that risk policy and risk appetite/tolerance, monitoring key risk and accountability are the three dimensions of risk culture. In addition, based on the interviews, reward and recognition and internal relationships were identified as the two dimensions of risk. Top management and risk manager were found to be the primary drivers of ERM programme and risk culture in construction PLCs. The results of this study are used to formulate a survey instrument for the subsequent data collection to test the proposed theoretical model. © Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, 2021. This work is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
format Article
author Ching, Wong Ching
Rahim, Faizul Azli Mohd
Low, Siaw Chuing
author_facet Ching, Wong Ching
Rahim, Faizul Azli Mohd
Low, Siaw Chuing
author_sort Ching, Wong Ching
title Enterprise risk management and risk culture in construction public listed companies
title_short Enterprise risk management and risk culture in construction public listed companies
title_full Enterprise risk management and risk culture in construction public listed companies
title_fullStr Enterprise risk management and risk culture in construction public listed companies
title_full_unstemmed Enterprise risk management and risk culture in construction public listed companies
title_sort enterprise risk management and risk culture in construction public listed companies
publisher Penerbit Univ Sains Malaysia
publishDate 2021
url http://eprints.um.edu.my/35690/
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85122266572&doi=10.21315%2fjcdc2021.26.2.2&partnerID=40&md5=b1f23c55d9f2da611305f2e73ba07d8a
_version_ 1748181091272884224
score 13.149126