Impact of Coronary Stent Architecture on Clinical Outcomes: Do Minor Changes in Stent Architecture Really Matter?

Introduction: The objective of this study was to compare the accumulated clinical outcomes of two Malaysian all-comers populations, each treated with different polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stents (PF-SES) of similar stent design. Methods: The Malaysian subpopulation of two all-comers observational...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nuruddin, A.A.B., Wan Ahmad, Wan Azman, Waliszewski, M., Heang, T.M., Bang, L.H., Yusof, A.K.M., Abidin, I.Z., Zuhdi, A.S., Krackhardt, F.
Format: Article
Published: Springer Nature 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/35659/
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85108386389&doi=10.1007%2fs40119-020-00204-4&partnerID=40&md5=b5f09a2c056ab3889aae1c8df8a5f523
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.um.eprints.35659
record_format eprints
spelling my.um.eprints.356592023-10-19T08:19:27Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/35659/ Impact of Coronary Stent Architecture on Clinical Outcomes: Do Minor Changes in Stent Architecture Really Matter? Nuruddin, A.A.B. Wan Ahmad, Wan Azman Waliszewski, M. Heang, T.M. Bang, L.H. Yusof, A.K.M. Abidin, I.Z. Zuhdi, A.S. Krackhardt, F. R Medicine Medical technology Introduction: The objective of this study was to compare the accumulated clinical outcomes of two Malaysian all-comers populations, each treated with different polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stents (PF-SES) of similar stent design. Methods: The Malaysian subpopulation of two all-comers observational studies based on the same protocol (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT02629575 and NCT02905214) were combined and compared to a Malaysian-only cohort which was treated with a later-generation PF-SES. The PF-SES’s used differed only in their bare-metal backbone architecture, with otherwise identical sirolimus coating. The primary endpoint was the accumulated target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate at 12 months. The rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), stent thrombosis (ST) and myocardial infarction (MI) were part of the secondary endpoints. Results: A total of 643 patients were treated with either the first-generation PF-SES (413 patients) or second-generation PF-SES (230 patients). Patient demographics were similar in terms of age (p = 0.744), male gender (0.987), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.293), hypertension (p = 0.905) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS, 44.8 vs. 46.1, p = 0.752) between groups. There were no differences between treatment groups in terms of lesion length (20.8 ± 7.3 mm vs. 22.9 ± 7.9, p = 0.111) or vessel diameter (2.87 ± 0.39 vs. 2.93 ± 0.40, p = 0.052) despite numerically smaller diameters in the first-generation PF-SES group. The second-generation PF-SES tended to have more complex lesions as characterized by calcification (10.3 vs. 16.2, p = 0.022), severe tortuosity (3.5 vs. 6.9, p = 0.041) and B2/C lesions (49.2 vs. 62.8, p < 0.001). The accumulated TLR rates did not differ significantly between the first- and second-generation PF-SES (0.8 vs. 0.9, p = 0.891). The accumulated MACE rates were not significantly different (p = 0.561), at 1.5 (6/413) and 2.2 (5/230), respectively. Conclusions: Modifications in coronary stent architecture which enhance the radial strength and radiopacity without gross changes in strut thickness and design do not seem to impact clinical outcomes. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT02629575 and NCT02905214. © 2020, The Author(s). Springer Nature 2021 Article PeerReviewed Nuruddin, A.A.B. and Wan Ahmad, Wan Azman and Waliszewski, M. and Heang, T.M. and Bang, L.H. and Yusof, A.K.M. and Abidin, I.Z. and Zuhdi, A.S. and Krackhardt, F. (2021) Impact of Coronary Stent Architecture on Clinical Outcomes: Do Minor Changes in Stent Architecture Really Matter? Cardiology and Therapy, 10 (1). pp. 175-187. ISSN 2193-8261, DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s40119-020-00204-4 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s40119-020-00204-4>. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85108386389&doi=10.1007%2fs40119-020-00204-4&partnerID=40&md5=b5f09a2c056ab3889aae1c8df8a5f523 10.1007/s40119-020-00204-4
institution Universiti Malaya
building UM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaya
content_source UM Research Repository
url_provider http://eprints.um.edu.my/
topic R Medicine
Medical technology
spellingShingle R Medicine
Medical technology
Nuruddin, A.A.B.
Wan Ahmad, Wan Azman
Waliszewski, M.
Heang, T.M.
Bang, L.H.
Yusof, A.K.M.
Abidin, I.Z.
Zuhdi, A.S.
Krackhardt, F.
Impact of Coronary Stent Architecture on Clinical Outcomes: Do Minor Changes in Stent Architecture Really Matter?
description Introduction: The objective of this study was to compare the accumulated clinical outcomes of two Malaysian all-comers populations, each treated with different polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stents (PF-SES) of similar stent design. Methods: The Malaysian subpopulation of two all-comers observational studies based on the same protocol (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT02629575 and NCT02905214) were combined and compared to a Malaysian-only cohort which was treated with a later-generation PF-SES. The PF-SES’s used differed only in their bare-metal backbone architecture, with otherwise identical sirolimus coating. The primary endpoint was the accumulated target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate at 12 months. The rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), stent thrombosis (ST) and myocardial infarction (MI) were part of the secondary endpoints. Results: A total of 643 patients were treated with either the first-generation PF-SES (413 patients) or second-generation PF-SES (230 patients). Patient demographics were similar in terms of age (p = 0.744), male gender (0.987), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.293), hypertension (p = 0.905) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS, 44.8 vs. 46.1, p = 0.752) between groups. There were no differences between treatment groups in terms of lesion length (20.8 ± 7.3 mm vs. 22.9 ± 7.9, p = 0.111) or vessel diameter (2.87 ± 0.39 vs. 2.93 ± 0.40, p = 0.052) despite numerically smaller diameters in the first-generation PF-SES group. The second-generation PF-SES tended to have more complex lesions as characterized by calcification (10.3 vs. 16.2, p = 0.022), severe tortuosity (3.5 vs. 6.9, p = 0.041) and B2/C lesions (49.2 vs. 62.8, p < 0.001). The accumulated TLR rates did not differ significantly between the first- and second-generation PF-SES (0.8 vs. 0.9, p = 0.891). The accumulated MACE rates were not significantly different (p = 0.561), at 1.5 (6/413) and 2.2 (5/230), respectively. Conclusions: Modifications in coronary stent architecture which enhance the radial strength and radiopacity without gross changes in strut thickness and design do not seem to impact clinical outcomes. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT02629575 and NCT02905214. © 2020, The Author(s).
format Article
author Nuruddin, A.A.B.
Wan Ahmad, Wan Azman
Waliszewski, M.
Heang, T.M.
Bang, L.H.
Yusof, A.K.M.
Abidin, I.Z.
Zuhdi, A.S.
Krackhardt, F.
author_facet Nuruddin, A.A.B.
Wan Ahmad, Wan Azman
Waliszewski, M.
Heang, T.M.
Bang, L.H.
Yusof, A.K.M.
Abidin, I.Z.
Zuhdi, A.S.
Krackhardt, F.
author_sort Nuruddin, A.A.B.
title Impact of Coronary Stent Architecture on Clinical Outcomes: Do Minor Changes in Stent Architecture Really Matter?
title_short Impact of Coronary Stent Architecture on Clinical Outcomes: Do Minor Changes in Stent Architecture Really Matter?
title_full Impact of Coronary Stent Architecture on Clinical Outcomes: Do Minor Changes in Stent Architecture Really Matter?
title_fullStr Impact of Coronary Stent Architecture on Clinical Outcomes: Do Minor Changes in Stent Architecture Really Matter?
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Coronary Stent Architecture on Clinical Outcomes: Do Minor Changes in Stent Architecture Really Matter?
title_sort impact of coronary stent architecture on clinical outcomes: do minor changes in stent architecture really matter?
publisher Springer Nature
publishDate 2021
url http://eprints.um.edu.my/35659/
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85108386389&doi=10.1007%2fs40119-020-00204-4&partnerID=40&md5=b5f09a2c056ab3889aae1c8df8a5f523
_version_ 1781704490763681792
score 13.214268