3D rapid prototyping heart model validation for teaching and training - A pilot project in a teaching institution

Introduction: Rapid prototyping is a process by which threedimensional (3D) computerized surface models are converted into physical models. In this study, a 3D heart bio model was created using the rapid prototyping method and the accuracy of this heart model was assessed by clinicians. Methods: The...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Krishnasamy, Sivakumar, Raja Mokhtar, Raja Amin, Singh, Ramesh, Sivallingam, Sivakumar, Aziz, Yang Faridah Abdul, Mathaneswaran, Vickneswaran
Format: Article
Published: Soc Brasil Cirurgia Cardiovasc 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/28254/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Introduction: Rapid prototyping is a process by which threedimensional (3D) computerized surface models are converted into physical models. In this study, a 3D heart bio model was created using the rapid prototyping method and the accuracy of this heart model was assessed by clinicians. Methods: The two-dimensional images of normal heart from gated computed tomography scan datasets were used to create a 3D model of the heart. The slices were then processed using the software BioModroid and printed with the 3D printer. The evaluation of the model was performed by a questionnaire answered by four cardiothoracic surgeons, 12 cardiologists, five radiologists, and nine surgical registrars. Results: Eighty-six percent of the anatomy structures showed in this model scored 100% accuracy. Structures such as circumflex branch of left coronary artery, great cardiac vein, papillary muscle, and coronary sinus were each rated 77%, 70%, 70%, and 57% accurate. Among 30 clinicians, a total of 93% rated the model accuracy as good and above; 64% of the clinicians evaluated this model as an excellent teaching tool for anatomy class. As a visual aid for surgery or interventional procedures, the model was rated excellent (40%), good (50%), average (23%), and poor (3%); 70% of the clinicians scored the model as above average for training purpose. Overall, this 3D rapid prototyping cardiac model was rated as excellent (33%), good (50%), and average (17%). Conclusion: This 3D rapid prototyping heart model will be a valuable source of anatomical education and cardiac interventional management.