Tooth-size discrepancy and Bolton's ratios: a literature review

OBJECTIVES: To review the literature on Bolton's tooth-size discrepancies (TSD) with specific attention to the prevalence of TSD, and the possible influence of different classes of malocclusion, gender and racial group. Also examined were the validity of the standard deviations from Bolton'...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Othman, S.A., Harradine, N.W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Maney Publishing 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/2804/1/Tooth_size_discrepancy_and_Bolton%27s_ratios%2C_a_literature_review.pdf
http://eprints.um.edu.my/2804/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.um.eprints.2804
record_format eprints
spelling my.um.eprints.28042017-07-08T07:48:51Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/2804/ Tooth-size discrepancy and Bolton's ratios: a literature review Othman, S.A. Harradine, N.W. RK Dentistry OBJECTIVES: To review the literature on Bolton's tooth-size discrepancies (TSD) with specific attention to the prevalence of TSD, and the possible influence of different classes of malocclusion, gender and racial group. Also examined were the validity of the standard deviations from Bolton's samples as an indicator of significant TSD, methods of measurement of TSD and their reproducibility. Based on the review, suggestions are made as to how future work could be improved. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Studies have reported from 20 to 30 of people with significant tooth-size anterior discrepancies and 5-14 for overall TSD. Bolton's original sample was appropriate for indicating what ratio is most likely to be associated with an excellent occlusion, but was not suited to indicating the size or prevalence of significant TSD. Most studies use samples that are not likely to be representative of orthodontic patients in the UK or, indeed, elsewhere. Although some statistically significant differences have been reported, gender and racial group seem unlikely to have a clinically significant influence on Bolton's tooth-size ratios. Class III malocclusions may have larger average ratios. Computerized methods of measurement are significantly more rapid. Most studies performed or reported their error analysis poorly, obscuring the clinical usefulness of the results. Studies are needed to properly explore the reproducibility of measurement of TSD and to appropriately determine what magnitude of TSD is of clinical significance. Maney Publishing 2006 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.um.edu.my/2804/1/Tooth_size_discrepancy_and_Bolton%27s_ratios%2C_a_literature_review.pdf Othman, S.A. and Harradine, N.W. (2006) Tooth-size discrepancy and Bolton's ratios: a literature review. Journal of Orthodontics, 33 (1). 45-51; discussion 29. ISSN 1465-3125
institution Universiti Malaya
building UM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaya
content_source UM Research Repository
url_provider http://eprints.um.edu.my/
language English
topic RK Dentistry
spellingShingle RK Dentistry
Othman, S.A.
Harradine, N.W.
Tooth-size discrepancy and Bolton's ratios: a literature review
description OBJECTIVES: To review the literature on Bolton's tooth-size discrepancies (TSD) with specific attention to the prevalence of TSD, and the possible influence of different classes of malocclusion, gender and racial group. Also examined were the validity of the standard deviations from Bolton's samples as an indicator of significant TSD, methods of measurement of TSD and their reproducibility. Based on the review, suggestions are made as to how future work could be improved. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Studies have reported from 20 to 30 of people with significant tooth-size anterior discrepancies and 5-14 for overall TSD. Bolton's original sample was appropriate for indicating what ratio is most likely to be associated with an excellent occlusion, but was not suited to indicating the size or prevalence of significant TSD. Most studies use samples that are not likely to be representative of orthodontic patients in the UK or, indeed, elsewhere. Although some statistically significant differences have been reported, gender and racial group seem unlikely to have a clinically significant influence on Bolton's tooth-size ratios. Class III malocclusions may have larger average ratios. Computerized methods of measurement are significantly more rapid. Most studies performed or reported their error analysis poorly, obscuring the clinical usefulness of the results. Studies are needed to properly explore the reproducibility of measurement of TSD and to appropriately determine what magnitude of TSD is of clinical significance.
format Article
author Othman, S.A.
Harradine, N.W.
author_facet Othman, S.A.
Harradine, N.W.
author_sort Othman, S.A.
title Tooth-size discrepancy and Bolton's ratios: a literature review
title_short Tooth-size discrepancy and Bolton's ratios: a literature review
title_full Tooth-size discrepancy and Bolton's ratios: a literature review
title_fullStr Tooth-size discrepancy and Bolton's ratios: a literature review
title_full_unstemmed Tooth-size discrepancy and Bolton's ratios: a literature review
title_sort tooth-size discrepancy and bolton's ratios: a literature review
publisher Maney Publishing
publishDate 2006
url http://eprints.um.edu.my/2804/1/Tooth_size_discrepancy_and_Bolton%27s_ratios%2C_a_literature_review.pdf
http://eprints.um.edu.my/2804/
_version_ 1643686995346587648
score 13.209306