Determining the utility of the guillain-barre syndrome classification criteria

Background and Purpose Several variants of Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) and Miller Fisher syndrome (MFS) exist, but their frequencies vary in different populations and do not always meet the inclusion criteria of the existing diagnostic criteria. However, the GBS classification criteria by Wakerley...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tan, Cheng-Yin, Razali, Siti Nur Omaira, Goh, Khean-Jin, Shahrizaila, Nortina
Format: Article
Published: Korean Neurological Assoc 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/26434/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.um.eprints.26434
record_format eprints
spelling my.um.eprints.264342022-03-02T08:30:09Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/26434/ Determining the utility of the guillain-barre syndrome classification criteria Tan, Cheng-Yin Razali, Siti Nur Omaira Goh, Khean-Jin Shahrizaila, Nortina R Medicine (General) Background and Purpose Several variants of Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) and Miller Fisher syndrome (MFS) exist, but their frequencies vary in different populations and do not always meet the inclusion criteria of the existing diagnostic criteria. However, the GBS classification criteria by Wakerley and colleagues recognize and define the clinical characteristics of each variant. We applied these criteria to a GBS and MFS cohort with the aim of determining their utility. Methods Consecutive GBS and MFS patients presenting to our center between 2010 and 2020 were analyzed. The clinical characteristics, electrophysiological data, and antiganglioside antibody profiles of the patients were utilized in determining the clinical classification. Results This study classified 132 patients with GBS and its related disorders according to the new classification criteria as follows: 64 (48.5%) as classic GBS, 2 (1.5%) as pharyngeal-cervical-brachial (PCB) variant, 7 (5.3%) as paraparetic GBS, 29 (22%) as classic MFS, 3 (2.3%) as acute ophthalmoparesis, 2 (1.5%) as acute ataxic neuropathy, 2 (1.5%) as Bickerstaff brainstem encephalitis (BBE), 17 (12.9%) as GBS/MFS overlap, 4 (3%) as GBS/BBE overlap, 1 (0.8%) as MFS/PCB overlap, and 1 (0.8%) as polyneuritis cranialis. The electrodiagnosis was demyelinating in 55% of classic GBS patients but unclassified in 79% of classic MFS patients. Anti-GM1, anti-GD1a, anti-GalNAc-GD1a, and anti-GD1b IgG ganglioside antibodies were more commonly detected in the axonal GBS subtype, whereas the anti-GQ1b and anti-GT1a IgG ganglioside antibodies were more common in classic MFS and its subtypes. Conclusions Most of the patients in the present cohort met the criteria of either classic GBS or MFS, but variants were seen in one-third of patients. These findings support the need to recognize variants of both syndromes in order to achieve a more-complete case ascertainment in GBS. Korean Neurological Assoc 2021-04 Article PeerReviewed Tan, Cheng-Yin and Razali, Siti Nur Omaira and Goh, Khean-Jin and Shahrizaila, Nortina (2021) Determining the utility of the guillain-barre syndrome classification criteria. Journal of Clinical Neurology, 17 (2). pp. 273-282. ISSN 1738-6586, DOI https://doi.org/10.3988/jcn.2021.17.2.273 <https://doi.org/10.3988/jcn.2021.17.2.273>. 10.3988/jcn.2021.17.2.273
institution Universiti Malaya
building UM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaya
content_source UM Research Repository
url_provider http://eprints.um.edu.my/
topic R Medicine (General)
spellingShingle R Medicine (General)
Tan, Cheng-Yin
Razali, Siti Nur Omaira
Goh, Khean-Jin
Shahrizaila, Nortina
Determining the utility of the guillain-barre syndrome classification criteria
description Background and Purpose Several variants of Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) and Miller Fisher syndrome (MFS) exist, but their frequencies vary in different populations and do not always meet the inclusion criteria of the existing diagnostic criteria. However, the GBS classification criteria by Wakerley and colleagues recognize and define the clinical characteristics of each variant. We applied these criteria to a GBS and MFS cohort with the aim of determining their utility. Methods Consecutive GBS and MFS patients presenting to our center between 2010 and 2020 were analyzed. The clinical characteristics, electrophysiological data, and antiganglioside antibody profiles of the patients were utilized in determining the clinical classification. Results This study classified 132 patients with GBS and its related disorders according to the new classification criteria as follows: 64 (48.5%) as classic GBS, 2 (1.5%) as pharyngeal-cervical-brachial (PCB) variant, 7 (5.3%) as paraparetic GBS, 29 (22%) as classic MFS, 3 (2.3%) as acute ophthalmoparesis, 2 (1.5%) as acute ataxic neuropathy, 2 (1.5%) as Bickerstaff brainstem encephalitis (BBE), 17 (12.9%) as GBS/MFS overlap, 4 (3%) as GBS/BBE overlap, 1 (0.8%) as MFS/PCB overlap, and 1 (0.8%) as polyneuritis cranialis. The electrodiagnosis was demyelinating in 55% of classic GBS patients but unclassified in 79% of classic MFS patients. Anti-GM1, anti-GD1a, anti-GalNAc-GD1a, and anti-GD1b IgG ganglioside antibodies were more commonly detected in the axonal GBS subtype, whereas the anti-GQ1b and anti-GT1a IgG ganglioside antibodies were more common in classic MFS and its subtypes. Conclusions Most of the patients in the present cohort met the criteria of either classic GBS or MFS, but variants were seen in one-third of patients. These findings support the need to recognize variants of both syndromes in order to achieve a more-complete case ascertainment in GBS.
format Article
author Tan, Cheng-Yin
Razali, Siti Nur Omaira
Goh, Khean-Jin
Shahrizaila, Nortina
author_facet Tan, Cheng-Yin
Razali, Siti Nur Omaira
Goh, Khean-Jin
Shahrizaila, Nortina
author_sort Tan, Cheng-Yin
title Determining the utility of the guillain-barre syndrome classification criteria
title_short Determining the utility of the guillain-barre syndrome classification criteria
title_full Determining the utility of the guillain-barre syndrome classification criteria
title_fullStr Determining the utility of the guillain-barre syndrome classification criteria
title_full_unstemmed Determining the utility of the guillain-barre syndrome classification criteria
title_sort determining the utility of the guillain-barre syndrome classification criteria
publisher Korean Neurological Assoc
publishDate 2021
url http://eprints.um.edu.my/26434/
_version_ 1735409412293525504
score 13.209306