Evaluation of bias-adjusted satellite precipitation estimations for extreme flood events in Langat river basin, Malaysia

Even though satellite precipitation products have received an increasing amount of attention in hydrology and meteorology, their estimations are prone to bias. This study investigates the three approaches of bias correction, i.e., linear scaling (LS), local intensity scaling (LOCI) and power transfo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Soo, Eugene Zhen Xiang, Jaafar, Wan Zurina Wan, Lai, Sai Hin, Othman, Faridah, El-Shafie, Ahmed, Islam, Tanvir, Srivastava, Prashant, Hadi, Hazlina Salehan Othman
Format: Article
Published: IWA Publishing 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/25786/
https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2019.071
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Even though satellite precipitation products have received an increasing amount of attention in hydrology and meteorology, their estimations are prone to bias. This study investigates the three approaches of bias correction, i.e., linear scaling (LS), local intensity scaling (LOCI) and power transformation (PT), on the three advanced satellite precipitation products (SPPs), i.e., CMORPH, TRMM and PERSIANN over the Langat river basin, Malaysia by focusing on five selected extreme floods due to northeast monsoon season. Results found the LS scheme was able to match the mean precipitation of every SPP but does not correct standard deviation (SD) or coefficient of variation (CV) of the estimations regardless of extreme floods selected. For LOCI scheme, only TRMM and CMORPH estimations in certain floods have showed some improvement in their results. This might be due to the rainfall threshold set in correcting process. PT scheme was found to be the best method as it improved most of the statistical performances as well as the rainfall distribution of the floods. Sensitivity of the parameters used in the bias correction is also investigated. PT scheme is found to be least sensitive in correcting the daily SPPs compared to the other two schemes. However, careful consideration should be given for correcting the CMORPH and PERSIANN estimations. © 2020 The Authors.