Actual and estimated adenoma detection rates: a 2‐year monocentric colonoscopic screening outcome in Shenzhen, China

Background and Aim: While adenoma detection rate (ADR) is an important quality metric for screening colonoscopy, it remains difficult to be accessed due to the lack of integrated endoscopy and pathology databases. Hence, the use of an adenoma-to-polyp detection rate quotient and polyp detection rate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zeng, Li, Chua, Eng Guan, Xiong, Ying, Ding, Shihua, Ai, Hui, Hou, Zhibo, Loke, Mun Fai, Goh, Khean Lee, Tay, Chin Y., Marshall, Barry J., Zhu, Fuqiang, Sun, Dayong
Format: Article
Published: Wiley 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/25704/
https://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12322
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.um.eprints.25704
record_format eprints
spelling my.um.eprints.257042021-01-20T06:57:19Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/25704/ Actual and estimated adenoma detection rates: a 2‐year monocentric colonoscopic screening outcome in Shenzhen, China Zeng, Li Chua, Eng Guan Xiong, Ying Ding, Shihua Ai, Hui Hou, Zhibo Loke, Mun Fai Goh, Khean Lee Tay, Chin Y. Marshall, Barry J. Zhu, Fuqiang Sun, Dayong R Medicine Background and Aim: While adenoma detection rate (ADR) is an important quality metric for screening colonoscopy, it remains difficult to be accessed due to the lack of integrated endoscopy and pathology databases. Hence, the use of an adenoma-to-polyp detection rate quotient and polyp detection rate (PDR) has been proposed to predict ADR. This study aimed to examine the usefulness of estimated ADR across different colonic segments in two age groups for Shenzhen people in China. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 7329 colonoscopy procedures performed by 12 endoscopists between January 2012 and February 2014. The PDR, actual ADR, and estimated ADR of the entire, proximal, and distal colon, and within each colonic segment, in two patient age groups: <50 and ≥50 years, were calculated for each endoscopist. Results: The overall polyp and adenoma prevalence rates were 19.1 and 9.3%, respectively. The average age of adenoma-positive patients was significantly higher than that of adenoma-negative patients (54 ± 12.6 years vs 42.9 ± 13.2 years, respectively). A total of 1739 polyps were removed, among which 826 were adenomas. More adenomatous polyps were found in the proximal colon (60.4%, 341/565) than in the distal colon (40.9%, 472/1154). Overall, both actual and estimated ADR correlated strongly at the entire colon level and within most colonic segments, except for the cecum and rectum. In both age groups, these parameters correlated strongly within the traverse colon and descending colon. Conclusion: Caution should be exercised when predicting ADR within the sigmoid colon and rectum. © 2020 The Authors. JGH Open: An open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. Wiley 2020 Article PeerReviewed Zeng, Li and Chua, Eng Guan and Xiong, Ying and Ding, Shihua and Ai, Hui and Hou, Zhibo and Loke, Mun Fai and Goh, Khean Lee and Tay, Chin Y. and Marshall, Barry J. and Zhu, Fuqiang and Sun, Dayong (2020) Actual and estimated adenoma detection rates: a 2‐year monocentric colonoscopic screening outcome in Shenzhen, China. JGH Open, 4 (4). pp. 707-712. ISSN 2397-9070 https://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12322 doi:10.1002/jgh3.12322
institution Universiti Malaya
building UM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaya
content_source UM Research Repository
url_provider http://eprints.um.edu.my/
topic R Medicine
spellingShingle R Medicine
Zeng, Li
Chua, Eng Guan
Xiong, Ying
Ding, Shihua
Ai, Hui
Hou, Zhibo
Loke, Mun Fai
Goh, Khean Lee
Tay, Chin Y.
Marshall, Barry J.
Zhu, Fuqiang
Sun, Dayong
Actual and estimated adenoma detection rates: a 2‐year monocentric colonoscopic screening outcome in Shenzhen, China
description Background and Aim: While adenoma detection rate (ADR) is an important quality metric for screening colonoscopy, it remains difficult to be accessed due to the lack of integrated endoscopy and pathology databases. Hence, the use of an adenoma-to-polyp detection rate quotient and polyp detection rate (PDR) has been proposed to predict ADR. This study aimed to examine the usefulness of estimated ADR across different colonic segments in two age groups for Shenzhen people in China. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 7329 colonoscopy procedures performed by 12 endoscopists between January 2012 and February 2014. The PDR, actual ADR, and estimated ADR of the entire, proximal, and distal colon, and within each colonic segment, in two patient age groups: <50 and ≥50 years, were calculated for each endoscopist. Results: The overall polyp and adenoma prevalence rates were 19.1 and 9.3%, respectively. The average age of adenoma-positive patients was significantly higher than that of adenoma-negative patients (54 ± 12.6 years vs 42.9 ± 13.2 years, respectively). A total of 1739 polyps were removed, among which 826 were adenomas. More adenomatous polyps were found in the proximal colon (60.4%, 341/565) than in the distal colon (40.9%, 472/1154). Overall, both actual and estimated ADR correlated strongly at the entire colon level and within most colonic segments, except for the cecum and rectum. In both age groups, these parameters correlated strongly within the traverse colon and descending colon. Conclusion: Caution should be exercised when predicting ADR within the sigmoid colon and rectum. © 2020 The Authors. JGH Open: An open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
format Article
author Zeng, Li
Chua, Eng Guan
Xiong, Ying
Ding, Shihua
Ai, Hui
Hou, Zhibo
Loke, Mun Fai
Goh, Khean Lee
Tay, Chin Y.
Marshall, Barry J.
Zhu, Fuqiang
Sun, Dayong
author_facet Zeng, Li
Chua, Eng Guan
Xiong, Ying
Ding, Shihua
Ai, Hui
Hou, Zhibo
Loke, Mun Fai
Goh, Khean Lee
Tay, Chin Y.
Marshall, Barry J.
Zhu, Fuqiang
Sun, Dayong
author_sort Zeng, Li
title Actual and estimated adenoma detection rates: a 2‐year monocentric colonoscopic screening outcome in Shenzhen, China
title_short Actual and estimated adenoma detection rates: a 2‐year monocentric colonoscopic screening outcome in Shenzhen, China
title_full Actual and estimated adenoma detection rates: a 2‐year monocentric colonoscopic screening outcome in Shenzhen, China
title_fullStr Actual and estimated adenoma detection rates: a 2‐year monocentric colonoscopic screening outcome in Shenzhen, China
title_full_unstemmed Actual and estimated adenoma detection rates: a 2‐year monocentric colonoscopic screening outcome in Shenzhen, China
title_sort actual and estimated adenoma detection rates: a 2‐year monocentric colonoscopic screening outcome in shenzhen, china
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2020
url http://eprints.um.edu.my/25704/
https://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12322
_version_ 1690371482440433664
score 13.19449