Assessment on Embodied Energy of Non-Load Bearing Walls for Office Buildings

Two important factors that have been put in the limelight in the current age are environmental concerns and sustainable future. The building sector has emerged as an important player in this matter due to their contribution into the large share of resources and energy consumption as well as harmful...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Salehian, Sanaz, Ismail, Muhammad Azzam, Mohd Ariffin, Ati Rosemary
Format: Article
Published: MDPI 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/25177/
https://doi.org/10.3390/BUILDINGS10040079
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.um.eprints.25177
record_format eprints
spelling my.um.eprints.251772020-07-23T08:21:48Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/25177/ Assessment on Embodied Energy of Non-Load Bearing Walls for Office Buildings Salehian, Sanaz Ismail, Muhammad Azzam Mohd Ariffin, Ati Rosemary TH Building construction Two important factors that have been put in the limelight in the current age are environmental concerns and sustainable future. The building sector has emerged as an important player in this matter due to their contribution into the large share of resources and energy consumption as well as harmful greenhouse gas emission. This paper discusses the percentage of embodied energy (EE) in two common building wall materials in Malaysia: steel and concrete. Concrete is used in concrete non-load bearing walls and steel is used to manufacture curtain walls. Although there are more materials used in the selected case studies, steel and concrete possess the high amount of embodied energy. Thus, the concrete wall and curtain wall in the lifecycle analysis (LCA) pre-use phase in high-rise office buildings in Malaysia are considered in this research. GaBi software is used to evaluate and calculate embodied energy in the case studies. The functional unit for this LCA study is determined as one cubic meter of concrete non-load bearing wall and curtain wall. In order to determine the components included in the analysis, input-output flowcharts are created for each process. The comparison of these walls shows that curtain wall has more embodied energy than concrete. The highest amount of embodied energy in curtain wall construction for case B is 4873.89 MJ, and for the case A is 4851.09 MJ approximately. The amount of EE in the concrete non-load bearing wall for both case studies are the lowest amount, with 278.85 MJ for case A and 280.66 MJ for case B. Results also show that the manufacturing of materials is the biggest contribution to the amount of EE at more than 50%, whereas transportation is between 1.83% and 3.77% only. © 2020 by the authors. MDPI 2020 Article PeerReviewed Salehian, Sanaz and Ismail, Muhammad Azzam and Mohd Ariffin, Ati Rosemary (2020) Assessment on Embodied Energy of Non-Load Bearing Walls for Office Buildings. Buildings, 10 (4). p. 79. ISSN 2075-5309 https://doi.org/10.3390/BUILDINGS10040079 doi:10.3390/BUILDINGS10040079
institution Universiti Malaya
building UM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaya
content_source UM Research Repository
url_provider http://eprints.um.edu.my/
topic TH Building construction
spellingShingle TH Building construction
Salehian, Sanaz
Ismail, Muhammad Azzam
Mohd Ariffin, Ati Rosemary
Assessment on Embodied Energy of Non-Load Bearing Walls for Office Buildings
description Two important factors that have been put in the limelight in the current age are environmental concerns and sustainable future. The building sector has emerged as an important player in this matter due to their contribution into the large share of resources and energy consumption as well as harmful greenhouse gas emission. This paper discusses the percentage of embodied energy (EE) in two common building wall materials in Malaysia: steel and concrete. Concrete is used in concrete non-load bearing walls and steel is used to manufacture curtain walls. Although there are more materials used in the selected case studies, steel and concrete possess the high amount of embodied energy. Thus, the concrete wall and curtain wall in the lifecycle analysis (LCA) pre-use phase in high-rise office buildings in Malaysia are considered in this research. GaBi software is used to evaluate and calculate embodied energy in the case studies. The functional unit for this LCA study is determined as one cubic meter of concrete non-load bearing wall and curtain wall. In order to determine the components included in the analysis, input-output flowcharts are created for each process. The comparison of these walls shows that curtain wall has more embodied energy than concrete. The highest amount of embodied energy in curtain wall construction for case B is 4873.89 MJ, and for the case A is 4851.09 MJ approximately. The amount of EE in the concrete non-load bearing wall for both case studies are the lowest amount, with 278.85 MJ for case A and 280.66 MJ for case B. Results also show that the manufacturing of materials is the biggest contribution to the amount of EE at more than 50%, whereas transportation is between 1.83% and 3.77% only. © 2020 by the authors.
format Article
author Salehian, Sanaz
Ismail, Muhammad Azzam
Mohd Ariffin, Ati Rosemary
author_facet Salehian, Sanaz
Ismail, Muhammad Azzam
Mohd Ariffin, Ati Rosemary
author_sort Salehian, Sanaz
title Assessment on Embodied Energy of Non-Load Bearing Walls for Office Buildings
title_short Assessment on Embodied Energy of Non-Load Bearing Walls for Office Buildings
title_full Assessment on Embodied Energy of Non-Load Bearing Walls for Office Buildings
title_fullStr Assessment on Embodied Energy of Non-Load Bearing Walls for Office Buildings
title_full_unstemmed Assessment on Embodied Energy of Non-Load Bearing Walls for Office Buildings
title_sort assessment on embodied energy of non-load bearing walls for office buildings
publisher MDPI
publishDate 2020
url http://eprints.um.edu.my/25177/
https://doi.org/10.3390/BUILDINGS10040079
_version_ 1680857006694465536
score 13.214268