Evolution of sustainability in global green building rating tools

Green building rating tools (GBRTs) are well-known and important instruments for assessing building sustainability. GBRTs constantly upgrade to meet rapid development, one of which is achieving a reasonable balance among the “three pillars” of sustainability, namely, environmental, social and econom...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wen, Baohua, Musa, Siti Nurmaya, Onn, Chiu Chuen, Ramesh, Singh, Liang, Lihua, Wang, Wei
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/24763/
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120912
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.um.eprints.24763
record_format eprints
spelling my.um.eprints.247632020-06-10T00:45:51Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/24763/ Evolution of sustainability in global green building rating tools Wen, Baohua Musa, Siti Nurmaya Onn, Chiu Chuen Ramesh, Singh Liang, Lihua Wang, Wei TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery Green building rating tools (GBRTs) are well-known and important instruments for assessing building sustainability. GBRTs constantly upgrade to meet rapid development, one of which is achieving a reasonable balance among the “three pillars” of sustainability, namely, environmental, social and economic sustainability. This study analyzes the changes and trends in the three sustainability pillars of GBRT and reinforces the previous GBRT longitudinal studies in terms of research sample, time span, equal terms, and research depth. Ten global GBRTs are selected by specific screening principles, and a unified criterion framework is presented to compare these selected GBRTs on equal terms. The changes of GBRTs are then analyzed on three levels, namely, categories, subcategories, and criteria. The results show that in the past three decades, there is a continuous decrease in the weight of the environmental category, an obvious increase in the weight of the social category and a little rise in the wight of the “economic” category. “Pollution,” “physical comfort,” and “flexibility” are identified as “sensitive criteria” of environmental, social, and economic categories, respectively, given their significant changes; they are also critical factors for the evolution of GBRT for the past three decades. © 2020 Elsevier Ltd Elsevier 2020 Article PeerReviewed Wen, Baohua and Musa, Siti Nurmaya and Onn, Chiu Chuen and Ramesh, Singh and Liang, Lihua and Wang, Wei (2020) Evolution of sustainability in global green building rating tools. Journal of Cleaner Production, 259. p. 120912. ISSN 0959-6526 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120912 doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120912
institution Universiti Malaya
building UM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaya
content_source UM Research Repository
url_provider http://eprints.um.edu.my/
topic TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
spellingShingle TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
Wen, Baohua
Musa, Siti Nurmaya
Onn, Chiu Chuen
Ramesh, Singh
Liang, Lihua
Wang, Wei
Evolution of sustainability in global green building rating tools
description Green building rating tools (GBRTs) are well-known and important instruments for assessing building sustainability. GBRTs constantly upgrade to meet rapid development, one of which is achieving a reasonable balance among the “three pillars” of sustainability, namely, environmental, social and economic sustainability. This study analyzes the changes and trends in the three sustainability pillars of GBRT and reinforces the previous GBRT longitudinal studies in terms of research sample, time span, equal terms, and research depth. Ten global GBRTs are selected by specific screening principles, and a unified criterion framework is presented to compare these selected GBRTs on equal terms. The changes of GBRTs are then analyzed on three levels, namely, categories, subcategories, and criteria. The results show that in the past three decades, there is a continuous decrease in the weight of the environmental category, an obvious increase in the weight of the social category and a little rise in the wight of the “economic” category. “Pollution,” “physical comfort,” and “flexibility” are identified as “sensitive criteria” of environmental, social, and economic categories, respectively, given their significant changes; they are also critical factors for the evolution of GBRT for the past three decades. © 2020 Elsevier Ltd
format Article
author Wen, Baohua
Musa, Siti Nurmaya
Onn, Chiu Chuen
Ramesh, Singh
Liang, Lihua
Wang, Wei
author_facet Wen, Baohua
Musa, Siti Nurmaya
Onn, Chiu Chuen
Ramesh, Singh
Liang, Lihua
Wang, Wei
author_sort Wen, Baohua
title Evolution of sustainability in global green building rating tools
title_short Evolution of sustainability in global green building rating tools
title_full Evolution of sustainability in global green building rating tools
title_fullStr Evolution of sustainability in global green building rating tools
title_full_unstemmed Evolution of sustainability in global green building rating tools
title_sort evolution of sustainability in global green building rating tools
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2020
url http://eprints.um.edu.my/24763/
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120912
_version_ 1674066725206753280
score 13.159267