Knee cartilage segmentation and thickness computation from ultrasound images

Quantitative thickness computation of knee cartilage in ultrasound images requires segmentation of a monotonous hypoechoic band between the soft tissue-cartilage interface and the cartilage-bone interface. Speckle noise and intensity bias captured in the ultrasound images often complicates the segme...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Faisal, Amir, Ng, Siew Cheok, Goh, Siew Li, Lai, Khin Wee
Format: Article
Published: Springer Verlag 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/22095/
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-017-1710-2
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.um.eprints.22095
record_format eprints
spelling my.um.eprints.220952019-08-27T03:32:24Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/22095/ Knee cartilage segmentation and thickness computation from ultrasound images Faisal, Amir Ng, Siew Cheok Goh, Siew Li Lai, Khin Wee R Medicine Quantitative thickness computation of knee cartilage in ultrasound images requires segmentation of a monotonous hypoechoic band between the soft tissue-cartilage interface and the cartilage-bone interface. Speckle noise and intensity bias captured in the ultrasound images often complicates the segmentation task. This paper presents knee cartilage segmentation using locally statistical level set method (LSLSM) and thickness computation using normal distance. Comparison on several level set methods in the attempt of segmenting the knee cartilage shows that LSLSM yields a more satisfactory result. When LSLSM was applied to 80 datasets, the qualitative segmentation assessment indicates a substantial agreement with Cohen’s κ coefficient of 0.73. The quantitative validation metrics of Dice similarity coefficient and Hausdorff distance have average values of 0.91 ± 0.01 and 6.21 ± 0.59 pixels, respectively. These satisfactory segmentation results are making the true thickness between two interfaces of the cartilage possible to be computed based on the segmented images. The measured cartilage thickness ranged from 1.35 to 2.42 mm with an average value of 1.97 ± 0.11 mm, reflecting the robustness of the segmentation algorithm to various cartilage thickness. These results indicate a potential application of the methods described for assessment of cartilage degeneration where changes in the cartilage thickness can be quantified over time by comparing the true thickness at a certain time interval. Springer Verlag 2018 Article PeerReviewed Faisal, Amir and Ng, Siew Cheok and Goh, Siew Li and Lai, Khin Wee (2018) Knee cartilage segmentation and thickness computation from ultrasound images. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 56 (4). pp. 657-669. ISSN 0140-0118 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-017-1710-2 doi:10.1007/s11517-017-1710-2
institution Universiti Malaya
building UM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaya
content_source UM Research Repository
url_provider http://eprints.um.edu.my/
topic R Medicine
spellingShingle R Medicine
Faisal, Amir
Ng, Siew Cheok
Goh, Siew Li
Lai, Khin Wee
Knee cartilage segmentation and thickness computation from ultrasound images
description Quantitative thickness computation of knee cartilage in ultrasound images requires segmentation of a monotonous hypoechoic band between the soft tissue-cartilage interface and the cartilage-bone interface. Speckle noise and intensity bias captured in the ultrasound images often complicates the segmentation task. This paper presents knee cartilage segmentation using locally statistical level set method (LSLSM) and thickness computation using normal distance. Comparison on several level set methods in the attempt of segmenting the knee cartilage shows that LSLSM yields a more satisfactory result. When LSLSM was applied to 80 datasets, the qualitative segmentation assessment indicates a substantial agreement with Cohen’s κ coefficient of 0.73. The quantitative validation metrics of Dice similarity coefficient and Hausdorff distance have average values of 0.91 ± 0.01 and 6.21 ± 0.59 pixels, respectively. These satisfactory segmentation results are making the true thickness between two interfaces of the cartilage possible to be computed based on the segmented images. The measured cartilage thickness ranged from 1.35 to 2.42 mm with an average value of 1.97 ± 0.11 mm, reflecting the robustness of the segmentation algorithm to various cartilage thickness. These results indicate a potential application of the methods described for assessment of cartilage degeneration where changes in the cartilage thickness can be quantified over time by comparing the true thickness at a certain time interval.
format Article
author Faisal, Amir
Ng, Siew Cheok
Goh, Siew Li
Lai, Khin Wee
author_facet Faisal, Amir
Ng, Siew Cheok
Goh, Siew Li
Lai, Khin Wee
author_sort Faisal, Amir
title Knee cartilage segmentation and thickness computation from ultrasound images
title_short Knee cartilage segmentation and thickness computation from ultrasound images
title_full Knee cartilage segmentation and thickness computation from ultrasound images
title_fullStr Knee cartilage segmentation and thickness computation from ultrasound images
title_full_unstemmed Knee cartilage segmentation and thickness computation from ultrasound images
title_sort knee cartilage segmentation and thickness computation from ultrasound images
publisher Springer Verlag
publishDate 2018
url http://eprints.um.edu.my/22095/
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-017-1710-2
_version_ 1643691750958563328
score 13.211869