Framing public governance in Malaysia: Rhetorical appeals through accrual accounting
In government, the challenges of governance and anti-corruption are exacerbated by accounting not being fit for purpose. In developing countries, many governments adopt accrual accounting as a panacea. Drawing on Goffman's frame analysis, and rhetorical appeals to logic, credibility and emotion...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis
2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://eprints.um.edu.my/22077/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2017.07.002 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | In government, the challenges of governance and anti-corruption are exacerbated by accounting not being fit for purpose. In developing countries, many governments adopt accrual accounting as a panacea. Drawing on Goffman's frame analysis, and rhetorical appeals to logic, credibility and emotion, this paper examines the adoption of accrual accounting in Malaysia. It was found accrual accounting has potential for keying governance and anti-corruption. However, rhetorical appeals that attempt to legitimate neo-liberalism and engender public support in the name of progress were hindered by perceptions of endemic corruption and relatively weak democratic institutions of ‘good’ governance common to developing countries. |
|---|