Impact of Sustainability Balanced Scorecard Types on Environmental Investment Decision-Making

Investment decision-making based on aspects of sustainability is gaining importance among organizations around the globe. In this context, there is a need for quality investment decisions, which require sufficient knowledge among organizational managers about managing sustainability information to a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jassem, Suaad, Che Azmi, A.A., Zakaria, Zarina
Format: Article
Published: MDPI 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/21748/
https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020541
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.um.eprints.21748
record_format eprints
spelling my.um.eprints.217482019-08-02T02:32:46Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/21748/ Impact of Sustainability Balanced Scorecard Types on Environmental Investment Decision-Making Jassem, Suaad Che Azmi, A.A. Zakaria, Zarina HD Industries. Land use. Labor HF Commerce HG Finance Investment decision-making based on aspects of sustainability is gaining importance among organizations around the globe. In this context, there is a need for quality investment decisions, which require sufficient knowledge among organizational managers about managing sustainability information to achieve environmental objectives that meet stakeholder expectations. This has led to the emergence of organizational performance measuring tools such as the Sustainability Balanced Scorecard, which integrates the environmental perspective into the traditional Balanced Scorecard. Using experimental research method, the objective of this study is to investigate the indirect effect of Eco-efficiency knowledge and Sustainability Balanced Scorecard knowledge as mediators influencing the relationship between Sustainability Balanced Scorecard types and their impact on environmental investment decision-making. Findings of the current research are based on 60 respondents who were randomly assigned to one of the following two types of Sustainability Balanced Scorecard architecture: (1) environmental data embedded within the traditional Balanced Scorecard perspectives; and (2) standalone environmental data as an additional fifth perspective along with the traditional Balanced Scorecard architecture. The traditional Balanced Scorecard without any information on environmental perspective is included in the experiment as the control condition. The findings indicate that the combined effect of ecoefficiency knowledge and Sustainability Balanced Scorecard knowledge has a significant positive influence on the relationship between the Balanced Scorecard type versus Sustainability Balanced Scorecard type and environmental investment decision-making. MDPI 2018 Article PeerReviewed Jassem, Suaad and Che Azmi, A.A. and Zakaria, Zarina (2018) Impact of Sustainability Balanced Scorecard Types on Environmental Investment Decision-Making. Sustainability, 10 (2). p. 541. ISSN 2071-1050 https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020541 doi:10.3390/su10020541
institution Universiti Malaya
building UM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaya
content_source UM Research Repository
url_provider http://eprints.um.edu.my/
topic HD Industries. Land use. Labor
HF Commerce
HG Finance
spellingShingle HD Industries. Land use. Labor
HF Commerce
HG Finance
Jassem, Suaad
Che Azmi, A.A.
Zakaria, Zarina
Impact of Sustainability Balanced Scorecard Types on Environmental Investment Decision-Making
description Investment decision-making based on aspects of sustainability is gaining importance among organizations around the globe. In this context, there is a need for quality investment decisions, which require sufficient knowledge among organizational managers about managing sustainability information to achieve environmental objectives that meet stakeholder expectations. This has led to the emergence of organizational performance measuring tools such as the Sustainability Balanced Scorecard, which integrates the environmental perspective into the traditional Balanced Scorecard. Using experimental research method, the objective of this study is to investigate the indirect effect of Eco-efficiency knowledge and Sustainability Balanced Scorecard knowledge as mediators influencing the relationship between Sustainability Balanced Scorecard types and their impact on environmental investment decision-making. Findings of the current research are based on 60 respondents who were randomly assigned to one of the following two types of Sustainability Balanced Scorecard architecture: (1) environmental data embedded within the traditional Balanced Scorecard perspectives; and (2) standalone environmental data as an additional fifth perspective along with the traditional Balanced Scorecard architecture. The traditional Balanced Scorecard without any information on environmental perspective is included in the experiment as the control condition. The findings indicate that the combined effect of ecoefficiency knowledge and Sustainability Balanced Scorecard knowledge has a significant positive influence on the relationship between the Balanced Scorecard type versus Sustainability Balanced Scorecard type and environmental investment decision-making.
format Article
author Jassem, Suaad
Che Azmi, A.A.
Zakaria, Zarina
author_facet Jassem, Suaad
Che Azmi, A.A.
Zakaria, Zarina
author_sort Jassem, Suaad
title Impact of Sustainability Balanced Scorecard Types on Environmental Investment Decision-Making
title_short Impact of Sustainability Balanced Scorecard Types on Environmental Investment Decision-Making
title_full Impact of Sustainability Balanced Scorecard Types on Environmental Investment Decision-Making
title_fullStr Impact of Sustainability Balanced Scorecard Types on Environmental Investment Decision-Making
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Sustainability Balanced Scorecard Types on Environmental Investment Decision-Making
title_sort impact of sustainability balanced scorecard types on environmental investment decision-making
publisher MDPI
publishDate 2018
url http://eprints.um.edu.my/21748/
https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020541
_version_ 1643691649487863808
score 13.209306